Passed 20 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 23 without it.
Without skill83%
With skill87%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The build command sets AFL_LLVM_CMPLOG=1.
1 fixed19 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+4 pp
Tokens
+209%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-29%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/12/2026v120 of 23 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
A test case the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Prompt
We are compiling a C/C++ binary with AFL++ for coverage-guided fuzzing. Developers usually pass standard build flags, but we want to enable comparison logging for hard integer and string comparison solving. Which environment variable flag should be passed during compiler invocation?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The build command sets AFL_LLVM_CMPLOG=1.
Missed
Passed
case-03 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/12/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
KRACK (CVE-2017-13077..082) and FragAttacks (CVE-2020-24586..588 + 26139-26147) — key reinstallation, fragmentation, and aggregation attacks against WPA2 supplicants. Covers Vanhoef's test scripts, viability against modern patched stacks (mostly mitigated post-2021), residual unpatched embedded devices and IoT vendors, and the practical limitations of these attacks in modern engagements. Use when assessing legacy supplicants, embedded clients, or vendors with poor patch cadence.