Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →SolubleMPNN uses the ProteinMPNN Modal wrapper with soluble model:
.claude/skills/solublempnn/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| Requirement | Minimum | Recommended | |-------------|---------|-------------| | Python | 3.8+ | 3.10 | | CUDA | 11.0+ | 11.7+ | | GPU VRAM | 8GB | 16GB (T4) | | RAM | 8GB | 16GB |
> First time? See Installation Guide to set up Modal and biomodals.
SolubleMPNN uses the ProteinMPNN Modal wrapper with soluble model:
bashcd biomodals modal run modal_proteinmpnn.py \ --pdb-path backbone.pdb \ --num-seq-per-target 16 \ --sampling-temp 0.1 \ --model-name v_48_020
GPU: T4 (16GB) | Timeout: 600s default
bashgit clone https://github.com/dauparas/ProteinMPNN.git cd ProteinMPNN # Use soluble model weights python protein_mpnn_run.py \ --pdb_path backbone.pdb \ --out_folder output/ \ --num_seq_per_target 16 \ --sampling_temp "0.1" \ --model_name "v_48_020" # Soluble model
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description | |-----------|---------|-------|-------------| | --pdb_path | required | path | Input structure | | --num_seq_per_target | 1 | 1-1000 | Sequences per structure | | --sampling_temp | "0.1" | "0.0001-1.0" | Temperature (string!) | | --model_name | v_48_020 | string | Soluble model variant |
| Model | Description | Use Case | |-------|-------------|----------| | v_48_002 | Standard | General design | | v_48_020 | Soluble-trained | E. coli expression | | v_48_030 | High solubility | Difficult targets |
output/
├── seqs/backbone.fa
└── backbone_pdb/backbone_0001.pdb$ python protein_mpnn_run.py --pdb_path backbone.pdb --model_name v_48_020 --num_seq_per_target 8
Loading soluble model weights (v_48_020)...
Designing sequences for backbone.pdb
Generated 8 sequences in 2.1 seconds
output/seqs/backbone.fa:
>backbone_0001, score=1.31, global_score=1.24, seq_recovery=0.78
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>backbone_0002, score=1.28, global_score=1.21, seq_recovery=0.81
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSQFSRQLD...What good output looks like:
Should I use SolubleMPNN?
│
├─ What expression system?
│ ├─ E. coli → SolubleMPNN ✓
│ ├─ Mammalian → ProteinMPNN (PTMs matter more)
│ └─ Yeast → Either
│
├─ History of expression problems?
│ ├─ Yes, aggregation → SolubleMPNN ✓
│ ├─ Yes, low yield → SolubleMPNN ✓
│ └─ No → ProteinMPNN is fine
│
├─ What's in the binding site?
│ ├─ Small molecule / ligand → Use LigandMPNN
│ └─ Nothing / protein only → SolubleMPNN ✓
│
└─ Need highest solubility?
├─ Yes → Use v_48_030 model
└─ Standard → Use v_48_020 model| Campaign Size | Time (T4) | Cost (Modal) | Notes | |---------------|-----------|--------------|-------| | 100 backbones × 8 seq | 15-20 min | ~$2 | Standard | | 500 backbones × 8 seq | 1-1.5h | ~$8 | Large campaign |
Expected improvement: +15-30% solubility score vs standard ProteinMPNN.
bashgrep -c "^>" output/seqs/*.fa # Should match backbone_count × num_seq_per_target
Still insoluble: Try v_48_030 (higher solubility bias) Low diversity: Increase temperature to 0.2 Poor folding: Use standard ProteinMPNN and optimize later
| Error | Cause | Fix | |-------|-------|-----| | RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory | Long protein or large batch | Reduce batch_size | | FileNotFoundError: v_48_020 | Missing model weights | Download soluble weights |
Next: Structure prediction for validation → protein-qc for filtering.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +59 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.