Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when repeated large fills suggest directional participation or informed flow.
.claude/skills/superior-trade-large-fill-pressure/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 11% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -5% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -3% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -10% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 2% | 0% |
Use this when the user asks about whales, big fills, unusual size, or "who is moving this market."
POST /v3/markets/search.Good fit for directional-signal detection, weak fit for proving source-side confidence. Filled TradeTick replay can show whether big prints were associated with sustained movement, but it cannot reveal maker intent, hidden liquidity, or queue position.
Treat this as an archetype template that helps generate custom Nautilus strategy code; do not imply it is a proven edge.
Count large fill clusters over a rolling window. Enter when both size and direction align with the configured cluster threshold. Exit after a fixed window, reversal signal, or price giveback.
json{ "size_window_ticks": 80, "large_fill_multiple": 3.0, "cluster_ticks": 12, "min_cluster_count": 3, "order_size": 10, "exit_after_ticks": 40 }
| Knob | Effect | |---|---| | large_fill_multiple | Higher = only react to more unusual fills. | | cluster_ticks | Lower = require tighter timing between fills. | | min_cluster_count | Higher = fewer, higher-confidence entries. | | exit_after_ticks | Lower = shorter reaction window. |
"This is a filled-trade pressure archetype. It uses exact slugs and TradeTick backtests to shape a custom Nautilus strategy, not to promise profit."
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | 17,178 | 16,983 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,898 | 3,229 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 21,275 | 32,802 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,326 | 4,129 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 16,965 | 17,673 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,863 | 3,177 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 24,497 | 20,513 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,711 | 4,568 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 14,998 | 10,610 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,753 | 2,468 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 19,795 | 14,660 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,695 | 2,749 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 128,030 | 17,843 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,079 | 3,572 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 13,599 | 10,117 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,874 | 2,112 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 15,442 | 15,520 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,351 | 2,704 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,396 | 6,356 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,000 | 1,603 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 21,780 | 15,955 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,973 | 3,331 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 14,170 | 13,442 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,110 | 2,504 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 15,682 | 6,516 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,423 | 1,449 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 16,484 | 16,264 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,428 | 2,972 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 21,879 | 14,299 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,880 | 2,574 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 14,995 | 2,411 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,123 | 991 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 22,696 | 23,426 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,526 | 4,939 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 13,813 | 8,070 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,968 | 1,742 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 15,301 | 14,316 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,325 | 2,588 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 9,450 | 4,171 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,329 | 1,193 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 25,990 | 28,359 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,275 | 5,744 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 22,054 | 24,699 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,046 | 4,169 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.