thomasmoreai/arckit-at-dsgvo

> ⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DSB-Beauftragter / DPO / Rechtsabteilung before reliance. Citations to Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) / EU regulations may lag the current text — verify against the source. Some citations are marked [NEEDS VERIFICATION] and should be confirmed by an Austrian data protection practitioner before external use.

You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after $arckit-eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU GDPR baseline.

User Input

text
$ARGUMENTS

Instructions

> Note: Before generating, scan projects/ for existing project directories. For each project, list all ARC-*.md artifacts, check external/ for reference documents, and check 000-global/ for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.

Step 0: Read existing artifacts from the project context

MANDATORY (warn if missing):

• DATA (Data Model) — Extract: all entities with personal data, special category data (besondere Kategorien), data subjects, data flows, retention periods, third-party processors
• If missing: warn that an AT DSG assessment requires a data model to identify personal data categories
• RGPD (EU RGPD Assessment) — Extract: legal basis mapping, DPIA screening results, DPO determination, international transfer analysis
• If missing: warn that $arckit-at-dsgvo should be run after $arckit-eu-rgpd for best results. Proceed with available data.

RECOMMENDED (read if available, note if missing):

• REQ (Requirements) — Extract: data requirements (DR-xxx), compliance requirements, authentication requirements (Bürgerkarte / Handy-Signatur / ID Austria integration)
• STKE (Stakeholder Analysis) — Extract: data subject categories (especially minors, patients, employees covered by ArbVG co-determination)

OPTIONAL (read if available, skip silently):

• SECD (Secure by Design) — Extract: security measures relevant to Art. 32 GDPR assessment
• RISK (Risk Register) — Extract: existing privacy-related risks for cross-reference

Step 0b: Read external documents and policies

• Read any external documents in external/ — extract previous DSB correspondence, Verarbeitungsverzeichnis (Art. 30 ROPA), existing Auftragsverarbeitungsverträge (DPAs), Betriebsvereinbarungen for employee data
• Read any global policies in 000-global/policies/ — extract Datenschutzerklärung, data retention schedule, DSB-Meldungen policy
• If a prior DSB assessment or Datenschutzerklärung is found, use it to pre-populate compliance status and identify gaps.

Step 1: Identify or Create Project

Identify the target project from the hook context. If the project doesn't exist:

1. Use Glob to list projects/*/ directories and find the highest NNN-* number
2. Calculate the next number (zero-padded to 3 digits)
3. Slugify the project name
4. Use the Write tool to create projects/{NNN}-{slug}/README.md
5. Set PROJECT_ID and PROJECT_PATH

Step 2: Read Source Artifacts

Read all documents from Step 0. Identify:

• Presence of health data (Gesundheitsdaten) → triggers §§12–13 DSG + ELGA interop section
• Image/video processing (Bildverarbeitung, CCTV) → triggers §§12–13 DSG special regime
• Employee data processing → triggers ArbVG §96a Betriebsvereinbarung requirement
• Scientific research → triggers §§7–8 DSG (Forschungszwecke) with §2d DSG opinion possibility
• Minors as data subjects → triggers §4(4) DSG (AT age of digital consent: 14 years)
• Third-party processors in non-EEA → triggers TIA with DSB transfer focus

Step 3: Template Reading

Read the template (with user override support):

• First, check if .arckit/templates-custom/at-dsgvo-template.md exists in the project root
• If found: Read the user's customized template
• If not found: Read .arckit/templates/at-dsgvo-template.md

Step 4: Generate AT Data Protection Assessment

CRITICAL: Use the Write tool to create the assessment document.

1. Detect version: Check for existing ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ATDSG-v*.md files:

• No existing file → VERSION="1.0"
• Existing file → minor increment if refreshed, major if scope changed significantly

1. Auto-populate Document Control:

• Document ID: ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ATDSG-v{VERSION}
• Status: DRAFT
• Created Date: {current_date}
• Next Review Date: {current_date + 12 months}
• Classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE (privacy assessments contain sensitive risk information)
• Add note: "This document supplements ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v.md with Austrian/DSB-specific requirements"

1. Section 1: AT DSG Regulatory Framework

• Applicable texts table: DSGVO (EU 2016/679), DSG (BGBl. I 165/1999 idgF), sector laws (ELGA-G for health, StPO §§134–143b for law enforcement, GTelG 2012, ArbVG §96a)
• DSB as supervisory authority — contact: dsb.gv.at
• Austrian age of digital consent: 14 years (§4(4) DSG, lower than GDPR default 16) — flag if minors in scope
• Parallel BVwG (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) review pathway for DSB decisions [NEEDS VERIFICATION: confirm current venue rules]

1. Section 2: §§12–13 DSG — Image and Video Processing (conditional — only if CCTV/imagery detected)

• §12 DSG specific lawfulness grounds for image processing (additional to Art. 6 GDPR)
• §13 DSG labelling obligation (Kennzeichnungspflicht) — visible notice with responsible controller
• Retention limit: 72 hours default unless justified documented exception
• Prohibition of covert imaging except narrow statutory cases
• DSB Musterleitfaden Bildverarbeitung applicability [NEEDS VERIFICATION: confirm current guidance version]
• If no image processing: include section header with "N/A — no image or video processing identified"

1. Section 3: Health Data and ELGA (conditional — only if health data detected)

• Elektronische Gesundheitsakte (ELGA-G) interoperability requirements
• GTelG 2012 telematics interop for data exchange between health providers
• Art. 9(2) GDPR legal basis selection — in AT typically §§7–8 DSG + ELGA-G
• DPIA mandatory flag: special category data + large scale → run $arckit-dpia
• Opt-out vs opt-in for ELGA participation — controller's integration obligations
• If no health data: include section header with "N/A — no health data identified"

1. Section 4: Employee Data (Arbeitnehmerdatenschutz) (conditional — only if employee data in scope)

• ArbVG §96a Betriebsvereinbarung requirement for any system that enables employee monitoring [NEEDS VERIFICATION: confirm exact §96a(1) sub-point and threshold]
• Works council (Betriebsrat) co-determination rights
• Data Protection Impact Assessment interface with co-determination
• Distinction: systems touching "personal dignity" need Betriebsvereinbarung regardless of privacy level
• If out of scope: include section header with "N/A — no employee data or no employee monitoring potential"

1. Section 5: Scientific Research (§§7–8 DSG) (conditional — only if research use case)

• Research exemptions under §§7–8 DSG and Art. 89 GDPR
• Option to request DSB opinion under §2d DSG [NEEDS VERIFICATION: confirm current §2d text and practice]
• Pseudonymisation obligations
• Retention under research framework
• If not applicable: include section header with "N/A — no scientific research processing identified"

1. Section 6: Data Subject Rights (Austrian enforcement)

• Standard rights table (Art. 15–22 GDPR) with DSB response deadlines
• AT practice: DSB emphasises written response quality and timeliness
• Remedy path: complaint to DSB → appeal BVwG → VwGH/VfGH
• Right to copy of data — DSB interpretation tends to favour broad scope [NEEDS VERIFICATION]

1. Section 7: DSB Reporting and Registration

• Art. 30 GDPR ROPA (Verarbeitungsverzeichnis) — DSB has a documented expectation of depth
• DPO (Datenschutzbeauftragter) mandatory triggers:
• Public authority / public body → always mandatory
• Large-scale systematic monitoring
• Large-scale special category data processing
• DPO contact reporting to DSB via dsb.gv.at portal
• No general AT-specific registration obligation beyond EU GDPR (DSG abolished the former Datenverarbeitungsregister in 2018)

1. Section 8: Breach Notification to DSB

• 72-hour notification via dsb.gv.at online form
• Individual notification for high-risk breaches
• Breach register maintenance requirement
• AT enforcement practice on breach late-notification penalties [NEEDS VERIFICATION: recent DSB penalty cases]

1. Section 9: International Transfers (AT context)

• Post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment requirement — align with EDPB Recommendations 01/2020
• EU-US Data Privacy Framework status and AT implications
• DSB position on SCC supplementary measures [NEEDS VERIFICATION]

1. Section 10: DSB Enforcement Priorities and Gap Analysis

• Map against DSB recent enforcement focus (cookie consent, tracking, CCTV retention, employee monitoring, HR data) [NEEDS VERIFICATION: cite recent DSB annual report]
• Notable AT reference decisions for calibration [NEEDS VERIFICATION]
• Consolidate gaps from all sections
• Priority based on DSB enforcement priority and legal obligation level

Before writing the file, read .arckit/references/quality-checklist.md and verify all Common Checks pass.

Write the document to:

text
projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ATDSG-v{VERSION}.md

Step 5: Summary Output

text
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ AT DSG / DSGVO Assessment Generated
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

📄 Document: projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ATDSG-v{VERSION}.md
📋 Document ID: {document_id}
📅 Assessment Date: {date}
🔒 Classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Austrian-Specific Compliance Areas
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

| Area                            | Status       | Gaps |
|---------------------------------|--------------|------|
| §§12–13 Image/Video Processing  | {N/A or status} | {N} |
| Health Data / ELGA              | {N/A or status} | {N} |
| Employee Data / §96a ArbVG      | {N/A or status} | {N} |
| Research Exemptions §§7–8 DSG   | {N/A or status} | {N} |
| Age of Consent (14 years)       | {N/A or status} | {N} |
| DPO Registration with DSB       | {status}     | {N}  |
| DSB Enforcement Risks           | {level}      | {N}  |

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚡ Critical Actions
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

{List 🔴 High priority gaps}

Next steps:
1. {If DPIA required: Run $arckit-dpia}
2. {If employee monitoring: draft Betriebsvereinbarung §96a ArbVG}
3. {If no eu-rgpd baseline: Run $arckit-eu-rgpd first}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Important Notes

• Run after eu-rgpd: This command adds the Austrian layer on top of the EU GDPR baseline. For best results, run $arckit-eu-rgpd first, then this command.
• Austrian age of digital consent is 14, not 16: Austria chose the lower limit allowed by GDPR (§4(4) DSG). Do not apply the GDPR default of 16.
• §§12–13 DSG on image processing is unique: AT retained a standalone image-processing regime when harmonising with GDPR, with specific labelling and retention rules. This is not covered by the EU GDPR baseline and must be assessed separately if any CCTV/imagery is in scope.
• ArbVG §96a Betriebsvereinbarung is separate from GDPR: Employee monitoring capability requires a works-council agreement even where GDPR lawfulness is established. Flag if employee monitoring is possible.
• Verify citations: Austrian data protection practice evolves through DSB decisions and BVwG case law. Items marked [NEEDS VERIFICATION] must be confirmed against current DSB guidance before external use.
• Use Write Tool: AT DSG assessments cover multiple Austrian-specific regulations and are typically 2,000–4,000 words. Always use the Write tool.

Success Criteria

• ✅ Assessment document created at projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ATDSG-v{VERSION}.md
• ✅ Applicable DSG sections identified (§§7–8, §§12–13, §4(4), §2d as applicable)
• ✅ §§12–13 DSG image-processing regime assessed if CCTV/imagery in scope
• ✅ ELGA-G / GTelG 2012 interop assessed if health data in scope
• ✅ §96a ArbVG Betriebsvereinbarung requirement flagged if employee monitoring in scope
• ✅ §§7–8 DSG research exemptions addressed if research use case in scope
• ✅ Age of digital consent at 14 years applied (not GDPR default 16)
• ✅ DPO registration with DSB assessed
• ✅ 72-hour breach notification to DSB process assessed
• ✅ Post-Schrems II TIA requirement applied
• ✅ DSB enforcement priority self-assessment completed
• ✅ Gap analysis with prioritised action plan generated
• ✅ Document classified OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Example Usage

text
$arckit-at-dsgvo Austrian DSG layer for 001 — federal ministry HR system with CCTV at entrances, employee data, and potential monitoring of IT usage

$arckit-at-dsgvo Assess AT DSG obligations for a Vienna regional hospital group integrating with ELGA, processing Gesundheitsdaten, planning mobile patient portal

$arckit-at-dsgvo AT data protection for a research consortium processing pseudonymised health data for a longitudinal cohort study under §§7–8 DSG

Suggested Next Steps

After completing this command, consider running:

• $arckit-dpia -- Run a full Data Protection Impact Assessment if AT DSB screening flags high risk (when 2+ AT DPIA criteria triggered or DSB published Blacklist applies)
• $arckit-eu-rgpd -- Run the pan-EU GDPR baseline first if not already completed (when No prior eu-rgpd assessment exists for this project)
• $arckit-at-nisg -- Assess NISG obligations where personal data is processed by Essential/Important entities (when Entity potentially qualifies as Essential or Important under NISG)