Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →[COMMUNITY] Generate a Data Sharing Agreement under the UAE Government Services Data Sharing Policy. Captures collect-once mapping, federation/API plan, and PDPL lawful basis per share.
.claude/skills/thomasmoreai-arckit-uae-data-sharing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 27% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 8% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 45% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 72% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 119% | 0% |
> ⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / RSSI / federal compliance counsel before reliance. Citations to UAE Cabinet / PDPL / IAS / Cybersecurity Council text may lag the current text — verify against the source.
text$ARGUMENTS
You are an enterprise architect generating a Data Sharing Agreement under the UAE Government Services Data Sharing Policy ("collect once, use securely").
projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-*.md (federal principles, if present).arckit/templates/_partials/RENDERING.md.arckit/templates-custom/uae-data-sharing-template.md (user override).arckit/templates-custom/uae-data-sharing-template.md.arckit/templates/uae-data-sharing-template.mdscripts/bash/create-project.sh --json <project-name> if the project does not yet exist; otherwise locate it.scripts/bash/generate-document-id.sh DSHR --filename for the artefact filename.<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER --> marker per RENDERING.md..arckit/references/citation-instructions.md. The 23 April 2026 UAE Cabinet meeting announcement (Government Services Data Sharing Policy) MUST appear in the Document Register with its primary URL and the verification date.projects/<project-id>/<filename>.UAE Government Services Data Sharing Policy ("collect once, use securely") — Cabinet decision, 23 April 2026 (Cabinet Affairs). Primary URL: <https://mediaoffice.ae/en/news/2026/april/23-04/mohammed-bin-rashid-chairs-uae-cabinet-meeting>
$arckit-uae-pdpl has not yet been run, recommend it as a follow-up before sign-off.After completing this command, consider running:
$arckit-platform-design -- Federation and API mechanisms feed the integration specification.$arckit-uae-pdpl -- Per-share PDPL lawful basis must be reflected in the PDPL compliance assessment.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 23,484 | 4,601 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,417 | 1,270 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 25,498 | 37,824 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,628 | 6,395 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 25,839 | 11,504 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,969 | 1,809 | -64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→fail | 21,082 | 5,428 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,117 | 1,270 | -69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 9,230 | 8,174 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,457 | 1,463 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 15,266 | 129,167 | +746% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,482 | 1,570 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 9,445 | 5,499 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,855 | 1,381 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 16,171 | 34,655 | +114% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,912 | 6,392 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,929 | 2,237 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,008 | 1,285 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 8,243 | 6,993 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,245 | 1,612 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 8,736 | 4,186 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,624 | 1,752 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→fail | 11,494 | 7,075 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,122 | 1,410 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 5,313 | 2,572 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 968 | 1,399 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 7,111 | 4,212 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 998 | 1,715 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 9,176 | 10,619 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,520 | 1,289 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 12,015 | 17,074 | +42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,953 | 4,279 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 13,367 | 13,031 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,392 | 3,394 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 9,331 | 1,610 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,713 | 1,217 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 6,614 | 8,135 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,149 | 2,332 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 14,365 | 20,863 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,487 | 3,990 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 12,132 | 6,195 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,859 | 1,461 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 31,427 | 37,603 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,761 | 7,152 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 12 counted toward the lift figure. The other 10 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -5 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 12 comparable cases. 8 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.