▸case-14 A European private financial firm offering mobile banking services and online consumer credit wants to verify if banking services and digital passenger transport services are covered under the European Accessibility Act scope. | pass→pass | 12,190 | 10,585 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,159 | 2,388 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 I have attached our recent web accessibility audit for our cloud management portal. We are bidding on a US federal agency contract and need a VPAT report mapped against Section 508 standards. Please evaluate the audit findings and output a structured compliance document showing the conformance status for each requirement alongside any federal-specific documentation obligations. | pass→pass | 28,115 | 27,123 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,205 | 5,404 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A team lead wants to structure their team's compliance mapping workflow for a multi-region product launch across US and EU markets. Should the team draft the VPAT template first, or should they determine the regional jurisdictions and market product type first? | pass→pass | 9,473 | 9,580 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,923 | 2,292 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Our state government portal needs a legal compliance evaluation under ADA Title II for web apps following the 2024 DOJ final rule. Some team members argue we should map against WCAG 2.0 AA to match federal standards, while others insist on WCAG 2.2 AA. Which WCAG version and conformance level represents the formal regulatory standard under this 2024 rule? | pass→pass | 8,132 | 7,413 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,685 | 1,919 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 We are preparing a compliance mapping matrix for an enterprise software suite sold to European public sector procurement officers under EN 301 549. We already covered WCAG 2.1 AA in Clause 9 (Web). Should we flag any additional non-WCAG clause ranges in EN 301 549 that apply to ICT products like hardware, non-web software, or documentation? | fail→fail | 14,086 | 12,483 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,900 | 2,763 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 Our UK/EU cross-border e-commerce web platform needs an upcoming regulatory roadmap. Leadership wants to know when the European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforcement begins for private sector e-commerce operations and what product categories are in scope. | pass→pass | 16,488 | 11,289 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,011 | 2,603 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 An Ontario-based private sector business with 60 employees is filing its accessibility documentation under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). How frequently must the organization submit its accessibility compliance report to the Ontario government? | pass→pass | 4,003 | 5,859 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 846 | 1,380 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 When executing a compliance mapping workflow for EN 301 549 standard, at what stage relative to generating the VPAT or compliance status matrix should non-WCAG clauses (such as hardware or documentation requirements) be flagged? | pass→pass | 12,246 | 6,043 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,262 | 1,557 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 A web design agency in Toronto is building a portal for an Ontario private company covered by AODA. The team wants to confirm whether they must meet WCAG 2.1 AA or WCAG 2.0 AA to fulfill current legal requirements. | pass→pass | 8,243 | 6,338 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,695 | 1,594 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 A contractor building a web-based training tool for the US Department of Veterans Affairs believes that achieving WCAG 2.0 Level AA compliance satisfies 100% of Section 508 legal requirements. What additional non-web functional or operational requirements under Section 508 must also be addressed? | pass→pass | 11,555 | 11,919 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,280 | 2,918 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 An engineer creating a VPAT document wants to use simplified status labels like 'Pass', 'Partial Pass', 'Fail', and 'N/A' to make it easier for executive readers. If we strictly follow standard VPAT terminology, what standard term must replace 'Pass' when a product fully satisfies a criterion, and how should a criterion be labeled if a minor issue prevents full satisfaction? | pass→pass | 4,309 | 4,596 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 859 | 1,129 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 In our web app audit, 75% of the interactive forms lack accessible form labels and fail WCAG 1.3.1. A project manager suggests marking this criterion as 'Partially Supports' in the VPAT because 25% of the forms work fine. Is 'Partially Supports' appropriate when the majority of functionality fails? | pass→pass | 9,015 | 8,637 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,751 | 2,024 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 In our VPAT evaluation for a purely web-based SaaS dashboard, the criteria regarding synchronized captions for pre-recorded video (WCAG 1.2.2) were evaluated, but the product contains zero video or audio content. Should this criterion be evaluated as 'Supports' or marked with a different standard conformance level? | pass→pass | 17,896 | 5,301 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,618 | 1,465 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A US nationwide online retailer wants to map its e-commerce website audit against legal requirements under ADA Title III. What web accessibility standard and level is recognized for private sector commercial websites in current regulatory and enforcement contexts? | pass→pass | 7,280 | 8,714 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,448 | 2,001 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 A vendor supplying physical self-service kiosk hardware to European municipal transit authorities needs to map physical keypad and screen display accessibility audit findings against EN 301 549. Which clause of EN 301 549 covers ICT hardware requirements, separate from web content? | pass→fail | 5,376 | 9,309 | +73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,041 | 2,060 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 A software company is distributing downloadable PDF user manuals with its software package to EU government buyers. Under EN 301 549, should non-web electronic documents be evaluated under Clause 9 or a dedicated non-web document clause? | pass→pass | 7,175 | 6,581 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,527 | 1,719 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 A software vendor for the US Department of Defense is completing a Section 508 conformance report. The audit team asks whether WCAG 2.0 Single-A is sufficient or if Level AA is mandatory under Section 508. | pass→pass | 7,226 | 5,773 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,541 | 1,497 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 A private US-based direct-to-consumer fashion retail brand sells online to consumers in Germany and France. Does the European Accessibility Act apply to private sector e-commerce businesses operating in EU member states, or is it strictly limited to EU public sector bodies? | pass→pass | 9,173 | 7,115 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,841 | 1,801 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 A Canadian tech startup based in Ottawa, Ontario has 25 employees. Does AODA compliance reporting and WCAG mapping apply to Ontario private sector businesses of this size? | pass→pass | 11,717 | 12,373 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,202 | 2,792 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Here is an audit finding for our React web portal: 'Button missing accessible name (WCAG 4.1.2) on element `<button id="submit-btn"><i class="fa fa-paper-plane"></i></button>`'. Please write the corrected React JSX code to fix this accessibility defect in the DOM. | pass→pass | 5,080 | 6,144 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,139 | 1,669 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Write a Node.js script using `@axe-core/puppeteer` that launches Chrome, navigates to `https://example.com/login`, runs an automated accessibility scan, and saves the raw JSON results to `audit-results.json`. | pass→pass | 6,841 | 7,093 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,607 | 1,731 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Our retail company was served with a complaint in federal district court alleging ADA Title III web accessibility violations. Draft a formal legal motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) alleging lack of standing and mootness. | pass→pass | 18,657 | 18,181 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,712 | 3,928 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |