Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Interpret genetic variants (SNPs) from GWAS studies by aggregating evidence from multiple databases (GWAS Catalog, Open Targets Genetics, ClinVar). Retrieves variant annotations, GWAS trait associations, fine-mapping evidence, locus-to-gene predictions, and clinical significance. Use when asked to interpret a SNP by rsID, find disease associations for a variant, assess clinical significance, or answer questions like "What diseases is rs429358 associated with?" or "Interpret rs7903146".
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-gwas-snp-interpretation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Interpret genetic variants (SNPs) from GWAS studies by aggregating evidence from multiple sources to provide comprehensive clinical and biological context.
Use Cases:
The skill provides a comprehensive interpretation of SNPs by:
User Input: rs7903146
↓
[1] SNP Lookup
→ Get location, consequence, MAF
→ gwas_get_snp_by_id
↓
[2] Association Search
→ Find all trait/disease associations
→ gwas_get_associations_for_snp
↓
[3] Fine-Mapping (Optional)
→ Get credible set membership
→ OpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets
↓
[4] Gene Predictions
→ Extract L2G scores for causal genes
→ (embedded in credible sets)
↓
[5] Clinical Summary
→ Aggregate evidence
→ Identify key traits and genes
↓
Output: Comprehensive Interpretation Reportrs_id (str): dbSNP rs identifierinclude_credible_sets (bool, default=True): Query fine-mapping datap_threshold (float, default=5e-8): Genome-wide significance thresholdmax_associations (int, default=100): Maximum associations to retrieveReturns SNPInterpretationReport containing:
python{ 'rs_id': 'rs7903146', 'chromosome': '10', 'position': 112998590, 'ref_allele': 'C', 'alt_allele': 'T', 'consequence': 'intron_variant', 'mapped_genes': ['TCF7L2'], 'maf': 0.293 }
python[ { 'trait': 'Type 2 diabetes', 'p_value': 1.2e-128, 'beta': '0.28 unit increase', 'study_id': 'GCST010555', 'pubmed_id': '33536258', 'effect_allele': 'T' }, ... ]
python[ { 'study_id': 'GCST90476118', 'trait': 'Renal failure', 'finemapping_method': 'SuSiE-inf', 'p_value': 3.5e-42, 'predicted_genes': [ {'gene': 'TCF7L2', 'score': 0.863} ], 'region': '10:112950000-113050000' }, ... ]
Genome-wide significant associations with 100 traits/diseases:
- Type 2 diabetes
- Diabetic retinopathy
- HbA1c levels
...
Identified in 20 fine-mapped loci.
Predicted causal genes: TCF7L2See QUICK_START.md for platform-specific examples.
gwas_get_snp_by_id: Get SNP annotationgwas_get_associations_for_snp: Get all trait associationsOpenTargets_get_variant_info: Get variant details with population frequenciesOpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets: Get fine-mapping credible sets with L2Ginclude_credible_sets=True for clinical decisions| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.