Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Production-ready phylogenetics and sequence analysis skill for alignment processing, tree analysis, and evolutionary metrics. Computes treeness, RCV, treeness/RCV, parsimony informative sites, evolutionary rate, DVMC, tree length, alignment gap statistics, GC content, and bootstrap support using PhyKIT, Biopython, and DendroPy. Performs NJ/UPGMA/parsimony tree construction, Robinson-Foulds distance, Mann-Whitney U tests, and batch analysis across gene families. Integrates with ToolUniverse for s
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-phylogenetics/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Comprehensive phylogenetics and sequence analysis using PhyKIT, Biopython, and DendroPy. Designed for bioinformatics questions about multiple sequence alignments, phylogenetic trees, parsimony, molecular evolution, and comparative genomics.
IMPORTANT: This skill handles complex phylogenetic workflows. Most implementation details have been moved to references/ for progressive disclosure. This document focuses on high-level decision-making and workflow orchestration.
Apply when users:
BixBench Coverage: 33 questions across 8 projects (bix-4, bix-11, bix-12, bix-25, bix-35, bix-38, bix-45, bix-60)
NOT for (use other skills instead):
python# Core (MUST be installed) import numpy as np import pandas as pd from scipy import stats from Bio import AlignIO, Phylo, SeqIO from Bio.Phylo.TreeConstruction import DistanceCalculator, DistanceTreeConstructor # PhyKIT (primary computation engine) from phykit.services.tree.treeness import Treeness from phykit.services.tree.total_tree_length import TotalTreeLength from phykit.services.tree.evolutionary_rate import EvolutionaryRate from phykit.services.tree.dvmc import DVMC from phykit.services.tree.treeness_over_rcv import TreenessOverRCV from phykit.services.alignment.parsimony_informative_sites import ParsimonyInformative from phykit.services.alignment.rcv import RelativeCompositionVariability # DendroPy (for advanced tree operations) import dendropy # ToolUniverse (for sequence retrieval) from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
Installation:
bashpip install phykit dendropy biopython pandas numpy scipy
START: User question about phylogenetic data
│
├─ Q1: What type of analysis is needed?
│ │
│ ├─ ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS (FASTA/PHYLIP files)
│ │ ├─ Parsimony informative sites → phykit_parsimony_informative()
│ │ ├─ RCV score → phykit_rcv()
│ │ ├─ Gap percentage → alignment_gap_percentage()
│ │ ├─ GC content → alignment_statistics()
│ │ └─ See: references/sequence_alignment.md
│ │
│ ├─ TREE ANALYSIS (Newick files)
│ │ ├─ Treeness → phykit_treeness()
│ │ ├─ Tree length → phykit_tree_length()
│ │ ├─ Evolutionary rate → phykit_evolutionary_rate()
│ │ ├─ DVMC → phykit_dvmc()
│ │ ├─ Bootstrap support → extract_bootstrap_support()
│ │ └─ See: references/tree_building.md
│ │
│ ├─ COMBINED ANALYSIS (alignment + tree)
│ │ └─ Treeness/RCV → phykit_treeness_over_rcv()
│ │
│ ├─ TREE CONSTRUCTION (build from alignment)
│ │ ├─ Neighbor-Joining → build_nj_tree()
│ │ ├─ UPGMA → build_upgma_tree()
│ │ ├─ Parsimony → build_parsimony_tree()
│ │ └─ See: references/tree_building.md
│ │
│ ├─ GROUP COMPARISON (fungi vs animals, etc.)
│ │ ├─ Batch compute metrics per group
│ │ ├─ Mann-Whitney U test
│ │ ├─ Summary statistics (median, mean, percentiles)
│ │ └─ See: references/parsimony_analysis.md
│ │
│ └─ TREE COMPARISON
│ ├─ Robinson-Foulds distance → robinson_foulds_distance()
│ └─ Bootstrap consensus → bootstrap_analysis()
│
├─ Q2: What data format is available?
│ ├─ FASTA (.fa, .fasta, .faa, .fna)
│ ├─ PHYLIP (.phy, .phylip) - Use phylip-relaxed for long names
│ ├─ Nexus (.nex, .nexus)
│ ├─ Newick (.nwk, .newick, .tre, .tree)
│ └─ Auto-detect with load_alignment() or load_tree()
│
└─ Q3: Is this a batch analysis?
├─ Single gene → Run metric function once
├─ Multiple genes → Use batch_compute_metric()
└─ Group comparison → Use discover_gene_files() + compare_groups()| Metric | Function | Input | Description | |--------|----------|-------|-------------| | Treeness | phykit_treeness(tree_file) | Newick | Internal branch length / Total branch length | | RCV | phykit_rcv(aln_file) | FASTA/PHYLIP | Relative Composition Variability | | Treeness/RCV | phykit_treeness_over_rcv(tree, aln) | Both | Treeness divided by RCV | | Tree Length | phykit_tree_length(tree_file) | Newick | Sum of all branch lengths | | Evolutionary Rate | phykit_evolutionary_rate(tree_file) | Newick | Total branch length / num terminals | | DVMC | phykit_dvmc(tree_file) | Newick | Degree of Violation of Molecular Clock | | Parsimony Sites | phykit_parsimony_informative(aln_file) | FASTA/PHYLIP | Sites with ≥2 chars appearing ≥2 times | | Gap Percentage | alignment_gap_percentage(aln_file) | FASTA/PHYLIP | Percentage of gap characters |
See scripts/tree_statistics.py for implementation.
Question: "What is the median DVMC for fungi vs animals?"
Workflow:
python# 1. Discover files fungi_genes = discover_gene_files("data/fungi") animal_genes = discover_gene_files("data/animals") # 2. Compute metric fungi_dvmc = batch_dvmc(fungi_genes) animal_dvmc = batch_dvmc(animal_genes) # 3. Compare fungi_values = list(fungi_dvmc.values()) animal_values = list(animal_dvmc.values()) print(f"Fungi median DVMC: {np.median(fungi_values):.4f}") print(f"Animal median DVMC: {np.median(animal_values):.4f}")
See: references/parsimony_analysis.md for full implementation
Question: "What is the Mann-Whitney U statistic comparing treeness between groups?"
Workflow:
pythonfrom scipy import stats # Compute treeness for both groups group1_treeness = batch_treeness(group1_genes) group2_treeness = batch_treeness(group2_genes) # Mann-Whitney U test (two-sided) u_stat, p_value = stats.mannwhitneyu( list(group1_treeness.values()), list(group2_treeness.values()), alternative='two-sided' ) print(f"U statistic: {u_stat:.0f}") print(f"P-value: {p_value:.4e}")
Question: "What is the treeness/RCV for alignments with <5% gaps?"
Workflow:
python# 1. Filter by gap percentage valid_genes = [] for entry in gene_files: if 'aln_file' in entry: gap_pct = alignment_gap_percentage(entry['aln_file']) if gap_pct < 5.0: valid_genes.append(entry) # 2. Compute metric on filtered set results = batch_treeness_over_rcv(valid_genes) # 3. Report values = [r[0] for r in results.values()] # treeness/rcv ratio print(f"Median treeness/RCV: {np.median(values):.4f}")
Question: "What is the evolutionary rate for gene X?"
Workflow:
python# Find gene file gene_files = discover_gene_files("data/") gene_entry = [g for g in gene_files if g['gene_id'] == 'X'][0] # Compute metric evo_rate = phykit_evolutionary_rate(gene_entry['tree_file']) print(f"Evolutionary rate for gene X: {evo_rate:.4f}")
When building alignments (use external tools, not this skill):
| Method | Speed | Accuracy | Use Case | |--------|-------|----------|----------| | ClustalW | Slow | Medium | Small datasets (<100 sequences), educational | | MUSCLE | Fast | High | Medium datasets (100-1000 sequences) | | MAFFT | Very Fast | Very High | Recommended - Large datasets (>1000 sequences) |
For this skill: Work with pre-aligned sequences. Use load_alignment() to read any format.
When to use which tree method:
| Method | Speed | Accuracy | Use Case | |--------|-------|----------|----------| | Neighbor-Joining | Fast | Medium | Quick trees, large datasets, exploratory | | UPGMA | Fast | Low | Assumes molecular clock, special cases only | | Maximum Parsimony | Medium | Medium | Small datasets, discrete characters | | Maximum Likelihood | Slow | High | Use external tools (IQ-TREE, RAxML) for production |
Implementation in this skill:
python# Fast distance-based trees tree = build_nj_tree("alignment.fa") # Neighbor-Joining tree = build_upgma_tree("alignment.fa") # UPGMA # Parsimony (for small alignments) tree = build_parsimony_tree("alignment.fa")
For production ML trees: Use IQ-TREE or RAxML externally, then analyze with this skill.
See references/tree_building.md for detailed implementations.
python# Auto-discover paired alignment + tree files gene_files = discover_gene_files("data/") # Result: list of dicts with 'gene_id', 'aln_file', 'tree_file' # [ # {'gene_id': 'gene1', 'aln_file': 'gene1.fa', 'tree_file': 'gene1.nwk'}, # {'gene_id': 'gene2', 'aln_file': 'gene2.fa', 'tree_file': 'gene2.nwk'}, # ... # ]
python# Tree metrics treeness_results = batch_treeness(gene_files) tree_length_results = batch_tree_length(gene_files) dvmc_results = batch_dvmc(gene_files) evo_rate_results = batch_evolutionary_rate(gene_files) # Alignment metrics rcv_results = batch_rcv(gene_files) pi_results = batch_parsimony_informative(gene_files) gap_results = batch_gap_percentage(gene_files) # Combined metrics treeness_rcv_results = batch_treeness_over_rcv(gene_files) # All return dict: {gene_id: value}
python# Summary statistics stats = summary_stats(list(treeness_results.values())) # Returns: {'mean': ..., 'median': ..., 'std': ..., 'min': ..., 'max': ...} # Group comparison comparison = compare_groups( list(fungi_treeness.values()), list(animal_treeness.values()), group1_name="Fungi", group2_name="Animals" ) # Returns: {'u_statistic': ..., 'p_value': ..., 'Fungi': {...}, 'Animals': {...}}
See references/parsimony_analysis.md for full workflow.
| Question Pattern | Extraction Method | |-----------------|-------------------| | "What is the median X?" | np.median(values) | | "What is the maximum X?" | np.max(values) | | "What is the difference between median X for A vs B?" | abs(np.median(a) - np.median(b)) | | "What percentage of X have Y above Z?" | sum(v > Z for v in values) / len(values) * 100 | | "What is the Mann-Whitney U statistic?" | stats.mannwhitneyu(a, b)[0] | | "What is the p-value?" | stats.mannwhitneyu(a, b)[1] | | "What is the X value for gene Y?" | results[gene_id] | | "What is the fold-change in median X?" | np.median(a) / np.median(b) | | "multiplied by 1000" | round(value * 1000) |
| Project | Questions | Metrics | |---------|-----------|---------| | bix-4 | 7 | DVMC analysis (fungi vs animals) | | bix-11 | 6 | Treeness analysis (median, percentages, Mann-Whitney U) | | bix-12 | 5 | Parsimony informative sites (counts, percentages, ratios) | | bix-25 | 2 | Treeness/RCV with gap filtering | | bix-35 | 4 | Evolutionary rate (specific genes, comparisons) | | bix-38 | 5 | Tree length (fold-change, variance, paired ratios) | | bix-45 | 4 | RCV (Mann-Whitney U, medians, paired differences) | | bix-60 | 1 | Average treeness across multiple trees |
pythonfrom tooluniverse import ToolUniverse tu = ToolUniverse() tu.load_tools() # Get sequences from NCBI result = tu.tools.NCBI_get_sequence(accession="NP_000546") # Get gene tree from Ensembl tree_result = tu.tools.EnsemblCompara_get_gene_tree(gene="ENSG00000141510") # Get species tree from OpenTree tree_result = tu.tools.OpenTree_get_induced_subtree(ott_ids="770315,770319")
tooluniverse-phylogenetics/
├── SKILL.md # This file (workflow orchestration)
├── QUICK_START.md # Quick reference
├── test_phylogenetics.py # Comprehensive test suite
├── references/
│ ├── sequence_alignment.md # Alignment analysis details
│ ├── tree_building.md # Tree construction methods
│ ├── parsimony_analysis.md # Statistical comparison workflows
│ └── troubleshooting.md # Common issues and solutions
└── scripts/
├── format_alignment.py # Alignment format conversion
└── tree_statistics.py # Core metric implementationsBefore returning your answer, verify:
alternative='two-sided' (default in scipy)references/sequence_alignment.mdreferences/tree_building.mdreferences/parsimony_analysis.mdreferences/troubleshooting.mdscripts/tree_statistics.pyFor issues with:
Same as ToolUniverse framework license.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.