Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Production-ready single-cell and expression matrix analysis using scanpy, anndata, and scipy. Performs scRNA-seq QC, normalization, PCA, UMAP, Leiden/Louvain clustering, differential expression (Wilcoxon, t-test, DESeq2), cell type annotation, per-cell-type statistical analysis, gene-expression correlation, batch correction (Harmony), trajectory inference, and cell-cell communication analysis. NEW: Analyzes ligand-receptor interactions between cell types using OmniPath (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB),
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-single-cell/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and expression matrix processing using scanpy, anndata, scipy, and ToolUniverse. Designed for both full scRNA-seq workflows (raw counts to annotated cell types) and targeted expression-level analyses (per-cell-type DE, correlation, ANOVA, clustering).
IMPORTANT: This skill handles complex multi-workflow analysis. Most implementation details have been moved to references/ for progressive disclosure. This document focuses on high-level decision-making and workflow orchestration.
Apply when users:
BixBench Coverage: 18+ questions across 5 projects (bix-22, bix-27, bix-31, bix-33, bix-36)
NOT for (use other skills instead):
tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2tooluniverse-gene-enrichmenttooluniverse-variant-analysistooluniverse-statistical-modelingpython# Core (MUST be installed) import scanpy as sc import anndata as ad import pandas as pd import numpy as np from scipy import stats from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, fcluster, dendrogram from scipy.spatial.distance import pdist from sklearn.decomposition import PCA from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests # Enrichment (for GO/KEGG/Reactome follow-up) import gseapy as gp # Optional import harmonypy # batch correction
Installation:
bashpip install scanpy anndata leidenalg umap-learn harmonypy gseapy pandas numpy scipy scikit-learn statsmodels
START: User question about scRNA-seq data
│
├─ Q1: What type of analysis is needed?
│ │
│ ├─ FULL PIPELINE (raw counts → annotated clusters)
│ │ └─ Workflow: QC → Normalize → HVG → PCA → Cluster → Annotate → DE
│ │ See: references/scanpy_workflow.md
│ │
│ ├─ DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION (per-cell-type comparison)
│ │ └─ Workflow: Load → Normalize → Per-CT DE → Report
│ │ Pattern: Most common BixBench pattern (bix-33)
│ │ See: Section "Per-Cell-Type Differential Expression" below
│ │
│ ├─ CORRELATION ANALYSIS (gene property vs expression)
│ │ └─ Workflow: Load → Filter genes → Compute correlation
│ │ Pattern: Gene length vs expression (bix-22)
│ │ See: Section "Statistical Analysis on Expression Data" below
│ │
│ ├─ CLUSTERING & PCA (expression matrix analysis)
│ │ └─ Workflow: Load → Transform → PCA/Cluster → Report
│ │ See: references/clustering_guide.md
│ │
│ ├─ CELL COMMUNICATION (ligand-receptor interactions)
│ │ └─ Workflow: Load → Get L-R pairs → Score → Identify signaling
│ │ See: references/cell_communication.md (DETAILED)
│ │
│ └─ TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS (pseudotime)
│ └─ Workflow: Load → Normalize → Trajectory → Pseudotime
│ See: references/trajectory_analysis.md
│
├─ Q2: What data format is available?
│ ├─ h5ad file → sc.read_h5ad() → Check contents (counts, metadata, clusters)
│ ├─ 10X files → sc.read_10x_mtx() or sc.read_10x_h5()
│ ├─ CSV/TSV → pd.read_csv() → Convert to AnnData (check orientation!)
│ └─ Other → See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Data Loading"
│
└─ Q3: Are there pre-computed results to use?
├─ Has cell type annotations → Skip clustering, go to analysis
├─ Has PCA/UMAP → Skip dimensionality reduction
├─ Has DE results → Skip DE, analyze results
└─ Raw counts only → Full pipeline neededQuestion: "Which immune cell type has the most DEGs after treatment?"
Workflow:
pythonimport scanpy as sc # Load and normalize adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) sc.pp.log1p(adata) # Per-cell-type DE cell_types = adata.obs['cell_type'].unique() de_results = {} for ct in cell_types: adata_ct = adata[adata.obs['cell_type'] == ct].copy() # Check sufficient cells n_treat = (adata_ct.obs['condition'] == 'treatment').sum() n_ctrl = (adata_ct.obs['condition'] == 'control').sum() if n_treat < 3 or n_ctrl < 3: continue # Run DE sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata_ct, groupby='condition', groups=['treatment'], reference='control', method='wilcoxon') df = sc.get.rank_genes_groups_df(adata_ct, group='treatment') # Count significant sig = df[df['pvals_adj'] < 0.05] de_results[ct] = {'n_sig': len(sig), 'results': df} print(f"{ct}: {len(sig)} DEGs") # Answer: Which has most? top_ct = max(de_results, key=lambda x: de_results[x]['n_sig']) print(f"Answer: {top_ct} ({de_results[top_ct]['n_sig']} DEGs)")
BixBench: bix-33
See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Differential Expression"
Question: "What is the Pearson correlation between gene length and expression in CD4 T cells?"
Workflow:
pythonimport scanpy as sc import pandas as pd import numpy as np from scipy import stats from scipy.sparse import issparse # Load data adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # Load gene annotations gene_info = pd.read_csv("gene_info.tsv", sep='\t', index_col=0) common = adata.var_names.intersection(gene_info.index) adata.var['gene_length'] = gene_info.loc[common, 'gene_length'].reindex(adata.var_names) adata.var['gene_type'] = gene_info.loc[common, 'gene_type'].reindex(adata.var_names) # Filter to protein-coding genes mask = adata.var['gene_type'] == 'protein_coding' adata_pc = adata[:, mask].copy() # Per-cell-type correlation cell_types = ['CD4 T cells', 'CD8 T cells', 'CD14 Monocytes'] # etc. for ct in cell_types: adata_ct = adata_pc[adata_pc.obs['cell_type'] == ct] # Mean expression per gene X = adata_ct.X.toarray() if issparse(adata_ct.X) else adata_ct.X mean_expr = np.mean(X, axis=0) gene_lengths = adata_ct.var['gene_length'].values # Remove NaN valid = ~np.isnan(gene_lengths) & ~np.isnan(mean_expr) # Pearson correlation r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths[valid], mean_expr[valid]) print(f"{ct}: r = {r:.6f}, p = {p:.2e}, n = {valid.sum()} genes")
BixBench: bix-22
See: SKILL_OLD.md "Phase 6: Statistical Analysis on Expression Data"
Question: "What percentage of variance is explained by PC1 after log10 transform?"
Workflow:
pythonimport pandas as pd import numpy as np from sklearn.decomposition import PCA # Load expression matrix df = pd.read_csv("expression.csv", index_col=0) # Orient: samples as rows, genes as columns if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: df = df.T # Genes were rows, transpose # Log10 transform with pseudocount X = np.log10(df.values + 1) # Run PCA n_components = min(X.shape[0], X.shape[1]) pca = PCA(n_components=n_components) pca.fit(X) # Variance explained print(f"PC1: {pca.explained_variance_ratio_[0]*100:.2f}% variance") print(f"PC1+PC2: {sum(pca.explained_variance_ratio_[:2])*100:.2f}%") print(f"Top 10 PCs: {sum(pca.explained_variance_ratio_[:10])*100:.2f}%")
BixBench: bix-27
See: references/clustering_guide.md "PCA Analysis"
Question: "What is the t-statistic comparing LFCs between CD4/CD8 and other cell types?"
Workflow:
pythonfrom scipy import stats # After running per-cell-type DE (Pattern 1): # Extract LFCs for different cell type groups # Group 1: CD4/CD8 cells cd4_lfc = de_results['CD4 T cells']['results']['log2FoldChange'].values cd8_lfc = de_results['CD8 T cells']['results']['log2FoldChange'].values cd4_cd8_lfc = np.concatenate([cd4_lfc, cd8_lfc]) # Group 2: Other cells other_lfc = [] for ct in ['CD14 Monocytes', 'NK cells', 'B cells']: other_lfc.append(de_results[ct]['results']['log2FoldChange'].values) other_lfc = np.concatenate(other_lfc) # Welch's t-test (unequal variances) t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(cd4_cd8_lfc, other_lfc, equal_var=False) print(f"t-statistic: {t_stat:.4f}") print(f"p-value: {p_val:.4e}")
BixBench: bix-31
See: SKILL_OLD.md "Phase 6.3: T-Tests Between Groups"
Question: "What is the F-statistic for miRNA expression across immune cell types?"
Workflow:
pythonimport pandas as pd from scipy import stats # Load miRNA expression df = pd.read_csv("mirna_expr.csv", index_col=0) meta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0) # Exclude PBMCs meta_filtered = meta[meta['cell_type'] != 'PBMC'] df_filtered = df[meta_filtered.index] # Group by cell type cell_types = meta_filtered['cell_type'].unique() groups = {} for ct in cell_types: samples = meta_filtered[meta_filtered['cell_type'] == ct].index groups[ct] = df_filtered[samples].values.flatten() # One-way ANOVA f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(*groups.values()) print(f"F-statistic: {f_stat:.4f}") print(f"p-value: {p_val:.4e}")
BixBench: bix-36
See: SKILL_OLD.md "Phase 6.4: ANOVA Across Groups"
Question: "Which ligand-receptor interactions are strongest between tumor and T cells?"
Workflow:
pythonfrom tooluniverse import ToolUniverse tu = ToolUniverse() tu.load_tools() # Step 1: Get ligand-receptor pairs from OmniPath result = tu.run_tool( "OmniPath_get_ligand_receptor_interactions", databases="CellPhoneDB,CellChatDB" ) lr_pairs = pd.DataFrame(result['data']['interactions']) # Step 2: Filter to expressed pairs # (genes present in dataset, mean expression > 0.05) expressed_lr = lr_pairs[ lr_pairs['source_genesymbol'].isin(adata.var_names) & lr_pairs['target_genesymbol'].isin(adata.var_names) ] # Step 3: Score communication between cell types # (mean ligand expr in sender * mean receptor expr in receiver) communication_scores = score_cell_communication( adata, expressed_lr, cell_type_col='cell_type' ) # Step 4: Filter to tumor-T cell interactions tumor_tcell = communication_scores[ ((communication_scores['sender'] == 'Tumor') & (communication_scores['receiver'].str.contains('T cell'))) | ((communication_scores['receiver'] == 'Tumor') & (communication_scores['sender'].str.contains('T cell'))) ] # Step 5: Top interactions top_interactions = tumor_tcell.nlargest(20, 'score') print(top_interactions[['sender', 'receiver', 'ligand', 'receptor', 'score']])
See: references/cell_communication.md (COMPLETE workflow with all helper functions)
For users familiar with Seurat (R):
| Operation | Seurat (R) | Scanpy (Python) | |-----------|------------|-----------------| | Load data | Read10X() | sc.read_10x_mtx() | | Normalize | NormalizeData() | sc.pp.normalize_total() + sc.pp.log1p() | | Find HVGs | FindVariableFeatures() | sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() | | Scale | ScaleData() | sc.pp.scale() | | PCA | RunPCA() | sc.tl.pca() | | Neighbors | FindNeighbors() | sc.pp.neighbors() | | Cluster | FindClusters() | sc.tl.leiden() or sc.tl.louvain() | | UMAP | RunUMAP() | sc.tl.umap() | | Find markers | FindMarkers() | sc.tl.rank_genes_groups() | | DE test | FindMarkers(test.use="wilcox") | method='wilcoxon' | | Batch correction | RunHarmony() | harmonypy.run_harmony() |
See: references/seurat_workflow.md for complete Seurat → Scanpy translation
See: references/cell_communication.md for complete OmniPath integration examples
AnnData expects: cells/samples as rows (obs), genes as columns (var)
pythonimport scanpy as sc import pandas as pd import anndata as ad # Load h5ad (already oriented) adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # Load CSV/TSV (check orientation!) df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0) # Heuristic: If genes > samples by 5x, transpose if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: print("Transposing: genes were rows") df = df.T adata = ad.AnnData(df)
pythonmeta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0) # Align indices common = adata.obs_names.intersection(meta.index) adata = adata[common].copy() for col in meta.columns: adata.obs[col] = meta.loc[common, col]
See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Phase 1: Data Loading"
python# QC metrics adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith(('MT-', 'mt-')) sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True) # Filter cells sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200) # Min genes per cell adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy() # Max mito % # Filter genes sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3) # Min cells per gene print(f"After QC: {adata.n_obs} cells x {adata.n_vars} genes")
See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Phase 2: Quality Control"
Q: What type of DE analysis?
Single-Cell DE (many cells per condition):
├─ Use: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups()
├─ Methods: wilcoxon (default), t-test, logreg
├─ Best for: Per-cell-type DE, marker gene finding
└─ See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Differential Expression"
Pseudo-Bulk DE (aggregate counts by sample):
├─ Use: DESeq2 via PyDESeq2
├─ Best for: Sample-level comparisons, replicates
└─ See: SKILL_OLD.md "Phase 5.3: DESeq2-based DE"
Statistical Tests Only:
├─ Use: scipy.stats (ttest_ind, f_oneway, pearsonr)
├─ Best for: Correlation, ANOVA, t-tests on summaries
└─ See: "Statistical Analysis on Expression Data" belowFor BixBench questions requiring specific statistical tests:
pythonfrom scipy import stats # Gene property vs expression r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths, mean_expression) r_s, p_s = stats.spearmanr(gene_lengths, mean_expression)
python# Welch's t-test (unequal variance) t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False) # Student's t-test (equal variance) t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=True)
python# One-way ANOVA across multiple groups f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3, ...)
pythonfrom statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests # Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='fdr_bh') # Bonferroni reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='bonferroni')
See: SKILL_OLD.md "Phase 6: Statistical Analysis on Expression Data" for complete examples
python# Find marker genes for each cluster sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon') # Get results for cluster 0 markers = sc.get.rank_genes_groups_df(adata, group='0') top_markers = markers.head(10) # Annotate clusters using markers marker_dict = { 'T cells': ['CD3D', 'CD3E', 'CD8A'], 'B cells': ['CD19', 'MS4A1', 'CD79A'], 'Monocytes': ['CD14', 'LYZ', 'S100A9'], } # Score and assign cell types
See: references/marker_identification.md for complete workflow
pythonimport harmonypy # After PCA sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50) # Run Harmony on PCA ho = harmonypy.run_harmony( adata.obsm['X_pca'][:, :30], adata.obs, 'batch', # batch column random_state=0 ) # Store corrected PCs adata.obsm['X_pca_harmony'] = ho.Z_corr.T # Re-cluster on corrected PCs sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep='X_pca_harmony') sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5) sc.tl.umap(adata)
See: references/scanpy_workflow.md "Batch Correction"
Always extract the specific answer to the user's question:
python# Example: "Which cell type has the most DEGs?" report = f""" # Analysis Results ## Per-Cell-Type Differential Expression | Cell Type | Significant DEGs (padj < 0.05) | |-----------|-------------------------------| {chr(10).join([f"| {ct} | {res['n_sig']} |" for ct, res in de_results.items()])} ## Answer **{top_ct}** has the highest number of significantly differentially expressed genes with **{de_results[top_ct]['n_sig']} DEGs** (Wilcoxon test, BH-corrected p < 0.05). """
| Issue | Solution | |-------|----------| | ModuleNotFoundError: leidenalg | pip install leidenalg | | Sparse matrix errors | Use .toarray(): X = adata.X.toarray() if issparse(adata.X) else adata.X | | Wrong matrix orientation | Check: more genes than samples? Transpose if needed | | NaN in correlation | Filter: valid = ~np.isnan(x) & ~np.isnan(y) | | Too few cells for DE | Need >= 3 cells per condition per cell type | | Gene names don't match | Use MyGene for ID conversion | | Memory error (large datasets) | Use sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() to reduce features |
See: references/troubleshooting.md for detailed solutions
Core Workflows:
Advanced Topics:
Utility Scripts:
pythonimport scanpy as sc # 1. Load data adata = sc.read_10x_h5("filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5") # 2. QC adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-') sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True) adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy() sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200) sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3) # 3. Normalize sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) sc.pp.log1p(adata) adata.raw = adata.copy() # 4. HVG + PCA sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000) sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50) # 5. Cluster sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_pcs=30) sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5) sc.tl.umap(adata) # 6. Find markers sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon') markers = sc.get.rank_genes_groups_df(adata, group='0') # 7. Annotate (manual or automatic) # 8. Per-cell-type DE (if conditions present) # 9. Cell communication analysis (if needed)
See: references/scanpy_workflow.md for detailed explanations of each step
This skill provides:
BixBench Coverage: 18+ questions across 5 projects (bix-22, bix-27, bix-31, bix-33, bix-36)
For detailed workflows, see references/ directory.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +17 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.