Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Update an existing implementation plan file with new or update requirements to provide new features, refactoring existing code or upgrading packages, design, architecture or infrastructure.
.claude/skills/update-implementation-plan/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
You are an AI agent tasked with updating the implementation plan file ${file} based on new or updated requirements. Your output must be machine-readable, deterministic, and structured for autonomous execution by other AI systems or humans.
This prompt is designed for AI-to-AI communication and automated processing. All instructions must be interpreted literally and executed systematically without human interpretation or clarification.
Plans must consist of discrete, atomic phases containing executable tasks. Each phase must be independently processable by AI agents or humans without cross-phase dependencies unless explicitly declared.
/plan/ directory[purpose]-[component]-[version].mdupgrade|refactor|feature|data|infrastructure|process|architecture|designupgrade-system-command-4.md, feature-auth-module-1.mdAll implementation plans must strictly adhere to the following template. Each section is required and must be populated with specific, actionable content. AI agents must validate template compliance before execution.
The status of the implementation plan must be clearly defined in the front matter and must reflect the current state of the plan. The status can be one of the following (status_color in brackets): Completed (bright green badge), In progress (yellow badge), Planned (blue badge), Deprecated (red badge), or On Hold (orange badge). It should also be displayed as a badge in the introduction section.
md--- goal: [Concise Title Describing the Package Implementation Plan's Goal] version: [Optional: e.g., 1.0, Date] date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD] last_updated: [Optional: YYYY-MM-DD] owner: [Optional: Team/Individual responsible for this spec] status: 'Completed'|'In progress'|'Planned'|'Deprecated'|'On Hold' tags: [Optional: List of relevant tags or categories, e.g., `feature`, `upgrade`, `chore`, `architecture`, `migration`, `bug` etc] --- # Introduction  [A short concise introduction to the plan and the goal it is intended to achieve.] ## 1. Requirements & Constraints [Explicitly list all requirements & constraints that affect the plan and constrain how it is implemented. Use bullet points or tables for clarity.] - **REQ-001**: Requirement 1 - **SEC-001**: Security Requirement 1 - **[3 LETTERS]-001**: Other Requirement 1 - **CON-001**: Constraint 1 - **GUD-001**: Guideline 1 - **PAT-001**: Pattern to follow 1 ## 2. Implementation Steps ### Implementation Phase 1 - GOAL-001: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.] | Task | Description | Completed | Date | |------|-------------|-----------|------| | TASK-001 | Description of task 1 | ✅ | 2025-04-25 | | TASK-002 | Description of task 2 | | | | TASK-003 | Description of task 3 | | | ### Implementation Phase 2 - GOAL-002: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.] | Task | Description | Completed | Date | |------|-------------|-----------|------| | TASK-004 | Description of task 4 | | | | TASK-005 | Description of task 5 | | | | TASK-006 | Description of task 6 | | | ## 3. Alternatives [A bullet point list of any alternative approaches that were considered and why they were not chosen. This helps to provide context and rationale for the chosen approach.] - **ALT-001**: Alternative approach 1 - **ALT-002**: Alternative approach 2 ## 4. Dependencies [List any dependencies that need to be addressed, such as libraries, frameworks, or other components that the plan relies on.] - **DEP-001**: Dependency 1 - **DEP-002**: Dependency 2 ## 5. Files [List the files that will be affected by the feature or refactoring task.] - **FILE-001**: Description of file 1 - **FILE-002**: Description of file 2 ## 6. Testing [List the tests that need to be implemented to verify the feature or refactoring task.] - **TEST-001**: Description of test 1 - **TEST-002**: Description of test 2 ## 7. Risks & Assumptions [List any risks or assumptions related to the implementation of the plan.] - **RISK-001**: Risk 1 - **ASSUMPTION-001**: Assumption 1 ## 8. Related Specifications / Further Reading [Link to related spec 1] [Link to relevant external documentation]
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +68 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.