Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Lightweight execution engine - multi-mode input, task grouping, batch execution, chain to workflow-lite-test-review
.claude/skills/workflow-lite-execute/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Execution engine for workflow-lite-plan handoff and standalone task execution.
<input> Task description string, or path to file (required)| Flag | Description | |------|-------------| | --in-memory | Mode 1: Use executionContext from workflow-lite-plan handoff (via Skill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) |
Trigger: --in-memory flag or executionContext global variable available
Input Source: executionContext global variable set by workflow-lite-plan
Behavior: Skip execution method/code review selection (already chosen in LP-Phase 4), directly proceed with full context (exploration, clarifications, plan artifacts all available)
> Note: LP-Phase 4 is the single confirmation gate. Mode 1 invocation means user already approved — no further prompts.
Trigger: User calls with task description string (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
Behavior: Store prompt as originalUserInput → create simple execution plan → run selectExecutionOptions() → proceed
Trigger: User calls with file path (ends with .md/.json/.txt)
javascriptfileContent = Read(filePath) try { jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent) // plan.json detection: two-layer format with task_ids[] if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) { planObject = jsonData originalUserInput = jsonData.summary isPlanJson = true const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '') planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids) } else { originalUserInput = fileContent isPlanJson = false } } catch { originalUserInput = fileContent isPlanJson = false }
isPlanJson === true: Use planObject directly → run selectExecutionOptions()isPlanJson === false: Treat as prompt (same as Mode 2)javascriptfunction selectExecutionOptions() { // autoYes: set by -y flag (standalone only; Mode 1 never reaches here) const autoYes = workflowPreferences?.autoYes ?? false if (autoYes) { return { execution_method: "Auto", code_review_tool: "Skip", convergence_review_tool: "Skip" } } return AskUserQuestion({ questions: [ { question: "Select execution method:", header: "Execution", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" }, { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" }, { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" } ] }, { question: "Code review after execution? (runs here in lite-execute)", header: "Code Review", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI: git diff quality review" }, { label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: prompt-based code quality review (--mode analysis)" }, { label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" }, { label: "Skip", description: "No code review" } ] }, { question: "Convergence review in workflow-lite-test-review phase?", header: "Convergence Review", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Agent", description: "Agent: verify convergence criteria" }, { label: "Gemini", description: "Gemini CLI: convergence verification" }, { label: "Codex", description: "Codex CLI: convergence verification" }, { label: "Skip", description: "Skip convergence review, run tests only" } ] } ] }) }
javascriptpreviousExecutionResults = [] // Mode 1: echo strategy for transparency if (executionContext) { console.log(` Execution Strategy (from lite-plan): Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod} Code Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool} Convergence Review: ${executionContext.convergenceReviewTool} Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length} Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity} ${executionContext.executorAssignments ? ` Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''} `) } // Helper: load .task/*.json files (two-layer format) function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) { return taskIds.map(id => JSON.parse(Read(`${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`))) } function getTasks(planObject) { return planObject._loadedTasks || [] }
javascript// Dependency extraction: explicit depends_on only (no file/keyword inference) function extractDependencies(tasks) { const taskIdToIndex = {} tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i }) return tasks.map((task, i) => { const deps = (task.depends_on || []) .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId]) .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i) return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps } }) } // Executor resolution: executorAssignments[taskId] > executionMethod > Auto fallback function getTaskExecutor(task) { const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {} if (assignments[task.id]) return assignments[task.id].executor // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent' const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto' if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent' if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex' return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex' // Auto fallback } function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) { const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] } tasks.forEach(task => { groups[getTaskExecutor(task)].push(task) }) return groups } // Batch creation: independent → per-executor parallel, dependent → sequential phases function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) { const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks) const processed = new Set() const calls = [] // Phase 1: Independent tasks → per-executor parallel batches const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0) if (independentTasks.length > 0) { const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(independentTasks) let parallelIndex = 1 for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) { if (tasks.length === 0) continue tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex)) calls.push({ method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel", groupId: `P${parallelIndex++}`, taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks }) } } // Phase 2+: Dependent tasks → respect dependency order let sequentialIndex = 1 let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex)) while (remaining.length > 0) { let ready = remaining.filter(t => t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))) if (ready.length === 0) { console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining'); ready = [...remaining] } if (ready.length > 1) { const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(ready) for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) { if (tasks.length === 0) continue tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex)) calls.push({ method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel", groupId: `P${calls.length + 1}`, taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks }) } } else { ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex)) calls.push({ method: executionMethod, executor: getTaskExecutor(ready[0]), executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${sequentialIndex++}`, taskSummary: ready[0].title, tasks: ready }) } remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex)) } return calls } executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` })) TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map((c, i) => ({ content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : `→ [${i+1}/${executionCalls.filter(x=>x.executionType==="sequential").length}]`} ${c.id} [${c.executor}] ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}`, status: "pending", activeForm: `Waiting: ${c.tasks.length} task(s) via ${c.executor}` })) })
> CHECKPOINT: Verify Phase 2 execution protocol (Step 3-5) is in active memory. If only a summary remains, re-read phases/02-lite-execute.md now.
Batch Routing (by batch.executor field):
javascriptfunction executeBatch(batch) { const executor = batch.executor || getTaskExecutor(batch.tasks[0]) const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone' const fixedId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}` if (executor === 'agent') { return Agent({ subagent_type: "code-developer", run_in_background: false, description: batch.taskSummary, prompt: buildExecutionPrompt(batch) }) } else { // CLI execution (codex/gemini): background with fixed ID const tool = executor // 'codex' | 'gemini' const mode = executor === 'gemini' ? 'analysis' : 'write' const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null const cmd = previousCliId ? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId} --resume ${previousCliId}` : `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId}` return Bash(cmd, { run_in_background: true }) // STOP - wait for task hook callback } }
Parallel execution rules:
Execution Flow: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
javascriptconst parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel") const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential") // Phase 1: All parallel batches (single message, multiple tool calls) if (parallel.length > 0) { TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending", activeForm: c.executionType === "parallel" ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : `Blocked by parallel phase` })) }) parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c))) previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults) TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending", activeForm: parallel.includes(c) ? `Done [${c.executor}]` : `Ready` })) }) } // Phase 2: Sequential batches one by one for (const call of sequential) { TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c === call ? "in_progress" : (c.status === "completed" ? "completed" : "pending"), activeForm: c === call ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : undefined })) }) result = await executeBatch(call) previousExecutionResults.push(result) TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: sequential.indexOf(c) <= sequential.indexOf(call) ? "completed" : "pending" })) }) }
Resume on Failure:
javascriptif (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') { // fixedId = `${sessionId}-${groupId}` (predictable, no auto-generated timestamps) console.log(`Execution incomplete. Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume ${fixedId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedId}-retry`) batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedId }
Progress tracked at batch level. Icons: ⚡ parallel (concurrent), → sequential (one-by-one).
Each task is a self-contained checklist. Same template for Agent and CLI.
javascriptfunction buildExecutionPrompt(batch) { const formatTask = (t) => ` ## ${t.title} **Scope**: \`${t.scope}\` | **Action**: ${t.action} ### Files ${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')} ${t.rationale ? `### Why this approach (Medium/High) ${t.rationale.chosen_approach} ${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `Key factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''} ${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `Tradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}` : ''} ### How to do it ${t.description} ${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')} ${t.code_skeleton ? `### Code skeleton (High) ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''} ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''} ${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}` : ''} ### Reference - Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'} - Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'} ${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''} ${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `### Risk mitigations (High) ${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}` : ''} ### Done when ${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')} ${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}` const sections = [] if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`) sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`) const context = [] if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`) if (clarificationContext) context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`) if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram) context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`) if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`) context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n(Loaded via ccw spec load --category planning)`) if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`) sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`) return sections.join('\n\n') }
Skip if: codeReviewTool === 'Skip'
Resolve review tool: From executionContext.codeReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.code_review_tool (Mode 2/3).
javascriptconst codeReviewTool = executionContext?.codeReviewTool || userSelection?.code_review_tool || 'Skip' const resolvedTool = (() => { if (!codeReviewTool || codeReviewTool === 'Skip') return 'skip' if (/gemini/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'gemini' if (/codex/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'codex' return 'agent' })() if (resolvedTool === 'skip') { console.log('[Code Review] Skipped') } else { // proceed with review }
Agent Code Review (resolvedTool === 'agent'):
javascriptAgent({ subagent_type: "code-reviewer", run_in_background: false, description: `Code review: ${planObject.summary}`, prompt: `## Code Review — Post-Execution Quality Check **Goal**: ${originalUserInput} **Plan Summary**: ${planObject.summary} ### Changed Files Run \`git diff --name-only HEAD~${getTasks(planObject).length}..HEAD\` to identify changes. ### Review Focus 1. **Code quality**: Readability, naming, structure, dead code 2. **Correctness**: Logic errors, off-by-one, null handling, edge cases 3. **Patterns**: Consistency with existing codebase conventions 4. **Security**: Injection, XSS, auth bypass, secrets exposure 5. **Performance**: Unnecessary loops, N+1 queries, missing indexes ### Instructions 1. Run git diff to see actual changes 2. Read changed files for full context 3. For each issue found: severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) + file:line + description + fix suggestion 4. Return structured review: issues[], summary, overall verdict (PASS/WARN/FAIL)` })
CLI Code Review — Codex (resolvedTool === 'codex'):
javascriptconst reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review` Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary} TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues MODE: analysis CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool codex --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true }) // STOP - wait for hook callback
CLI Code Review — Gemini (resolvedTool === 'gemini'):
javascriptconst reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review` Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary} TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues MODE: analysis CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true }) // STOP - wait for hook callback
Write review artifact (if session folder exists):
javascriptif (executionContext?.session?.folder) { Write(`${executionContext.session.folder}/code-review.md`, codeReviewOutput) }
Resolve convergence review tool: From executionContext.convergenceReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.convergence_review_tool (Mode 2/3).
javascriptfunction resolveConvergenceTool(ctx, selection) { const raw = ctx?.convergenceReviewTool || selection?.convergence_review_tool || 'skip' if (!raw || raw === 'Skip') return 'skip' if (/gemini/i.test(raw)) return 'gemini' if (/codex/i.test(raw)) return 'codex' return 'agent' }
Build testReviewContext and handoff:
javascripttestReviewContext = { planObject: planObject, taskFiles: executionContext?.taskFiles || getTasks(planObject).map(t => ({ id: t.id, path: `${executionContext?.session?.folder}/.task/${t.id}.json` })), convergenceReviewTool: resolveConvergenceTool(executionContext, userSelection), executionResults: previousExecutionResults, originalUserInput: originalUserInput, session: executionContext?.session || { id: 'standalone', folder: executionContext?.session?.folder || '.', artifacts: { plan: null, task_dir: null } } } // Chain to workflow-lite-test-review (Mode 1: In-Memory) Skill("workflow-lite-test-review") // testReviewContext passed as global variable
After workflow-lite-test-review returns: Ask user whether to expand into issues (enhance/refactor/doc). Selected items call /issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}".
| Error | Resolution | |-------|------------| | Missing executionContext | "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." | | File not found | "File not found: {path}. Check file path." | | Empty file | "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." | | Invalid plan JSON | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." | | Malformed JSON | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) | | Execution failure | Use fixed ID ${sessionId}-${groupId} for resume | | Execution timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout | | Codex unavailable | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution | | Fixed ID not found | Check ccw cli history, verify date directories |
javascript{ planObject: { summary: string, approach: string, task_ids: string[], task_count: number, _loadedTasks: [...], // populated at runtime from .task/*.json estimated_time: string, recommended_execution: string, complexity: string }, taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null, explorationsContext: {...} | null, explorationAngles: string[], explorationManifest: {...} | null, clarificationContext: {...} | null, executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto", codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Codex Review" | "Agent Review", convergenceReviewTool: "Skip" | "Agent" | "Gemini" | "Codex", originalUserInput: string, executorAssignments: { // per-task override, priority over executionMethod [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string } }, session: { id: string, // {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp} folder: string, // .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id} artifacts: { explorations: [{angle, path}], explorations_manifest: string, plan: string // always present } } }
javascript{ executionId: string, // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]" status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed", tasksSummary: string, completionSummary: string, keyOutputs: string, notes: string, fixedCliId: string | null // for resume: ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId} } // Appended to previousExecutionResults[] for context continuity
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.