Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/comparison-design
Design fair comparison experiments against baselines and competing methods
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 23 without it.
and 17 more in the full report
13 fixed8 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
If we compare 1 SOTA baseline and 1 simple baseline against our method on 1 dataset using 3 random seeds, how many total runs are required under the Minimal scope gate?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Specifies a minimum requirement of 6 total experimental runs. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Question: How much better is our method than the baseline?
| Comparison Scope | Baselines | Datasets | Seeds | Min Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal | 1 SOTA + 1 simple | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Standard | 2-3 baselines | 2-3 | 5 | 30-45 |
| Comprehensive | 4+ baselines | 3-5 | 5-10 | 100+ |
| Publication-ready | All relevant | 5+ | 10+ | 200+ |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| reproducibility-protocol | Ensure experiment reproducibility through systematic environment and seed control |
test cases passed, vs 7 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.