Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/dependency-mapping
SOP: map dependency relationships among sub-questions
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 22 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
8 fixed11 passed either way0 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We have three sub-questions for an HR policy update: SQ1: What are the state statutory remote work meal break requirements? SQ2: What is our company's draft remote work policy? SQ3: Does the draft policy in SQ2 align with statutory requirements from SQ1? SQ2 is drafted independently of SQ1, but SQ1 provides helpful background context. Map dependencies with explanations in parenthetical format.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The output includes a parenthetical note detailing why the weak dependency is non-blocking. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Map dependency relationships among sub-questions — determine which sub-questions must be answered first.
Dependencies:
SQ1 → SQ2 (strong: SQ2 needs SQ1's result as input)
SQ1 → SQ3 (weak: SQ3 benefits from SQ1 but can proceed independently)
SQ2 → SQ4 (strong)
Circular dependencies: NONE / [list]
Critical path: SQ1 → SQ2 → SQ4 (length: 3)
Parallel groups: [SQ1, SQ3] can run simultaneously
test cases passed, vs 14 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.