Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/framework-guided-formulation
Strategy: Select an RQ framework (PICO/SPIDER/SPICE/ECLIPSE) and apply it systematically
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 22 without it.
and 24 more in the full report
14 fixed3 passed either way3 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 14 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are designing a phenomenological study on how family caregivers experience burnout while supporting terminally ill dementia patients at home. Just write us a one-line question directly without filling out structural components.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Uses the SPIDER framework to organize the research parameters. | Missed | Passed |
| Explicitly populates Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research type. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Select the most suitable RQ framework and apply it systematically — when the research type is clear, use a standard framework to structure the question.
Core logic: Different research types have different standards for a "good question." A framework is a checklist, distilled by predecessors, of "what components a good question should contain." Pick the right framework → fill in each component → naturally arrive at a structured question.
| Research type | Recommended framework | Core components |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative/intervention research | PICO/PICOTS | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (+Time, Setting) |
| Qualitative research | SPIDER | Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type |
| Evaluation research | SPICE | Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation |
| Mixed methods | ECLIPSE | Expectation, Client group, Location, Impact, Professionals, Service |
| Tier | Framework candidates | Framework application | FINER check | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | ≥2 frameworks compared | Selected framework, all components filled | All 5 items pass | ≥1 RQ |
| M | ≥3 frameworks compared | Selected framework, all components + alternative framework comparison | 5 items + success criteria | ≥2 RQ |
| L | ≥4 frameworks compared | Multiple frameworks applied in parallel + optimal selection | 5 items + criteria + sensitivity | ≥3 RQ |
test cases passed, vs 5 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.