Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/framework-matching
SOP: Match the most suitable RQ framework based on research type
Passed 20 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 3 of 23 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
20 fixed0 passed either way0 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 20 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A study compares 6-week eccentric strength training versus standard stretching for pain reduction in chronic Achilles tendinopathy patients. Return JSON with recommended, rationale, and candidates.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Output JSON contains top-level key "recommended". | Passed | Passed |
| The recommended field value is "PICO". | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Match the most suitable RQ framework based on research type.
| Framework | Applicable research type | Core components | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICO/PICOTS | Quantitative/intervention | P-I-C-O(-T-S) | Clear structure, widely recognized | Not suitable for qualitative research |
| SPIDER | Qualitative | S-PI-D-E-R | Designed specifically for qualitative | Not suitable for intervention research |
| SPICE | Evaluation | S-P-I-C-E | Evaluation-oriented | Narrower scope |
| ECLIPSE | Mixed methods | E-C-L-I-P-S-E | Comprehensive, suitable for complex research | Many components, may be excessive |
{
recommended: "PICO",
rationale: "...",
candidates: [
{ framework: "PICO", fit_score: 9, reason: "..." },
{ framework: "SPIDER", fit_score: 4, reason: "..." }
]
}
test cases passed, vs 3 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.