▸case-01 Here is a policy memo claiming that remote work mandates improve long-term employee retention. Could you run a structured assumption check on this claim? Please surface all key assumptions made in the text, categorize them as explicit or implicit and foundational or operational, rate the evidence strength behind each, and analyze how critical each assumption is to the main argument. | fail→fail | 22,505 | 32,366 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,409 | 4,565 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 We are evaluating a new product hypothesis regarding AI-driven user onboarding. Please execute a key assumptions check on this document. I'd like a complete list of assumptions—specifying whether they are explicit or implicit and foundational or operational—along with evidence strength ratings for each and a determination of their criticality to the overall product thesis. | fail→fail | 23,568 | 38,266 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,852 | 6,064 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Our executive team drafted a strategic proposal claiming that launching our fintech app in Brazil will yield 100,000 active users within six months. Market analysts suspect several unstated beliefs are driving this projection. Perform an analytical evaluation of this proposal's underlying premises, categorizing each premise by type and operational tier, evaluating the backing strength for each, and determining how essential each premise is to the final target. | fail→fail | 36,715 | 29,893 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,214 | 4,413 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 We have a clinical trial proposal for a novel monoclonal antibody targeting autoimmune inflammation. Please run a structured analytic evaluation of the underlying premises in this protocol. Ensure you map out both stated and unstated premises, differentiate foundational premises from operational ones, rate evidence support using a 4-tier scale (strong/moderate/weak/unsupported), and gauge how critical each premise is to the trial's success. | fail→fail | 61,110 | 40,698 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,446 | 5,996 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Attached is our enterprise architecture plan to transition all corporate infrastructure to a zero-trust network model by Q4. We need a rigorous structured analytic review of the premises behind this plan. Identify all assumptions, tag them as explicit or implicit, classify their analytical scope as foundational or operational, rate evidence strength, and rate criticality to the overall architecture. | fail→fail | 28,463 | 42,025 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,573 | 6,766 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 Review this draft motion for summary judgment in a patent infringement suit involving battery management software. Please decompose the argument's premises into foundational and operational layers, mark whether each is explicit or implicit, grade the supporting evidence, and detail how critical each belief is to winning the motion. | fail→fail | 49,581 | 53,319 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 7,157 | 8,094 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 Our growth team proposes shifting our SaaS platform from per-seat billing to usage-based API pricing. Before presenting to the board, we want a structured premise audit. Analyze the document to list explicit and implicit assumptions, differentiate foundational assumptions from operational ones, rate evidence strength for each, and rate their criticality to the revenue model. | fail→fail | 30,151 | 79,410 | +163% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,944 | 6,124 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 Here is a policy proposal advocating for a national carbon offset trading system. Run a structured analysis to surface all assumptions in this document, classifying them as explicit or implicit, foundational or operational, and assessing evidence strength alongside criticality to the proposed regulation. | fail→fail | 30,423 | 37,386 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,217 | 5,591 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 We are reviewing a manufacturing whitepaper recommending moving semiconductor assembly from East Asia to Mexico. Conduct a structured evaluation of the assumptions in this document, categorizing them by visibility and structural tier, rating evidence strength, and measuring criticality to the supply chain strategy. | fail→fail | 38,378 | 44,191 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,701 | 7,589 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 An early-stage startup submitted a pitch deck asserting that their generative AI video editor will reach $10M ARR in year two. Conduct a structured analytic check on the pitch deck's premises. Highlight explicit versus implicit beliefs, foundational versus operational assumptions, rate the strength of supporting evidence, and state each assumption's criticality to the startup's valuation. | fail→fail | 28,180 | 31,777 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,895 | 4,387 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A city council proposal recommends issuing $500M in municipal bonds to expand light rail lines. Perform a structured assumption analysis on this proposal. Map explicit and implicit assumptions, distinguish foundational from operational assumptions, rate evidence strength, and judge criticality to bond repayment. | fail→fail | 29,073 | 25,692 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,979 | 4,545 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 This technical whitepaper outlines a plan for achieving 100% renewable grid reliance by 2035 using battery storage and green hydrogen. Execute a structured assumption check on the whitepaper. Categorize assumptions as explicit/implicit and foundational/operational, assess evidence strength, and rank criticality to grid reliability. | fail→fail | 40,649 | 43,840 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,213 | 6,667 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 A legacy retail bank plans to migrate all core banking databases to a public cloud environment over 18 months. Perform a structured analytic check on the migration document. Identify explicit and implicit assumptions, classify them as foundational or operational, rate evidence strength, and assess criticality to bank operations. | fail→fail | 24,469 | 43,720 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,279 | 6,692 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 An internal report claims that a new machine learning model reduces credit default rates without increasing demographic bias. Run a structured analysis to unearth all assumptions in the report, categorizing explicit vs implicit and foundational vs operational, rating evidence strength, and evaluating criticality to regulatory compliance. | fail→fail | 43,290 | 39,457 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,231 | 6,950 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A university task force proposes raising sticker tuition by 15% while expanding merit scholarship funds to boost net tuition revenue. Perform a structured check of the premises in this strategy. List explicit and implicit assumptions, distinguish foundational from operational assumptions, assign evidence strength ratings, and evaluate criticality to university solvency. | fail→fail | 28,804 | 26,151 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,917 | 4,729 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 An M&A memo projects $400M in annual operational synergies following the merger of two mid-sized biotechs. Conduct a structured analytical check on the proposal's assumptions, categorizing them by explicit/implicit state and foundational/operational level, rating evidence strength, and establishing criticality to transaction value. | fail→fail | 60,127 | 31,288 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,179 | 5,578 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 A commercial freight company released a safety case report arguing that driverless long-haul trucking on interstate highways is safer than human-operated trucks. Perform a structured assumption check on this document, categorizing explicit and implicit assumptions, foundational and operational assumptions, rating evidence strength, and detailing criticality to safety claims. | fail→fail | 26,888 | 35,314 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,054 | 5,702 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 A hospital network memo recommends mandatory 1:4 nurse-to-patient ratios across all medical-surgical units to lower readmission rates. Execute a structured analytic assumption check on the memo, classifying assumptions as explicit or implicit, foundational or operational, rating evidence strength, and measuring criticality to patient outcomes. | fail→fail | 19,924 | 40,080 | +101% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,306 | 6,872 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 A national department store chain proposes converting 30 suburban stores into local fulfillment hubs for same-day delivery. Perform a structured analytical premise evaluation. Classify assumptions by explicit/implicit nature and foundational/operational level, evaluate evidence strength, and determine criticality to retail profit margins. | fail→fail | 25,179 | 39,971 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,253 | 6,621 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Please review this op-ed regarding urban congestion pricing and conduct a formal logical fallacy audit. Identify specific logical fallacies committed in the argument (such as straw man, ad hominem, or slippery slope), explain where each fallacy occurs, and summarize how they weaken the author's rhetoric. | pass→pass | 6,205 | 6,962 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,024 | 1,514 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 We have an economic report stating that state sales tax revenue grew 12% in 2023. Cross-reference the cited figures in this report against official state treasury databases and public census statistics to verify whether the quoted historical growth numbers and revenue tallies are factually accurate. | pass→fail | 11,009 | 20,197 | +83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,649 | 3,812 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Our product team is launching a new peer-to-peer payment app next month. Run a standard Red Team pre-mortem exercise: imagine we are one year in the future and the launch has failed catastrophically. Write three realistic failure scenarios detailing operational, competitive, and regulatory events that caused the collapse. | pass→pass | 31,540 | 26,749 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,524 | 4,046 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |