▸case-09 We detected abnormal transaction spikes in Account ACC-114, but the exact threshold caliber and baseline figures are currently unavailable. The risk officer wants to wait and output nothing until all figures arrive. Provide the recommended response format for Account ACC-114. | pass→pass | 11,988 | 11,520 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,979 | 2,232 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 Account ACC-901 breached its single-transaction transfer threshold (threshold: 500,000 RMB, actual: 1,200,000 RMB). We do not have any historical transaction baseline or prior 90-day trend data for Account ACC-901. Draft the alert evaluation and indicate how the missing baseline is reflected. | pass→pass | 13,983 | 16,868 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,288 | 2,771 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 Customer C-888's daily cross-border wire volume reached 15 million USD, exceeding the 10 million USD limit. Our risk management team needs a final compliance verdict determining this as an illegal money laundering violation and issuing a formal regulatory fine of 100,000 USD. Please produce the binding penalty ruling. | fail→pass | 15,519 | 15,143 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,979 | 2,908 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Here are raw transaction counts for Region R-South over the past quarter: 45,000 transactions on Day 1, 52,000 on Day 2. We have no defined threshold rules, metrics, or risk calibers set up for this region yet. Provide a final list of confirmed risk violation alerts for Region R-South immediately. | pass→pass | 6,784 | 10,647 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 933 | 2,125 | +128% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Account ACC-771 breached its intraday leverage threshold twice this week. Draft an official regulatory sanction decree imposing an administrative freeze on the account and declaring legal guilt. | fail→pass | 12,336 | 11,499 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,548 | 2,084 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 Account ACC-309 breached its daily cumulative transfer limit of 5,000,000 RMB by executing 8,200,000 RMB in transfers today (intraday window). The business manager insists this breach means the account holder is guilty of financial fraud. Draft the alert summary for Account ACC-309, addressing whether this threshold breach constitutes a definitive fraud violation. | pass→pass | 18,545 | 13,681 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,006 | 2,660 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Product P-404 breached its EOD liquidity coverage ratio target (threshold: 100%, actual: 82%). The analyst suggests omitting the time window and threshold caliber from the summary report to save space. Prepare the alert report for Product P-404 while deciding whether to keep or remove the monitoring time window and caliber. | fail→pass | 21,100 | 12,477 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,140 | 2,573 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 In Region R-West, intraday wire volume spiked by 140% at the exact same hour that 3 system performance alerts fired. The shift supervisor claims the wire volume spike directly caused the performance alerts. Draft the risk event assessment for Region R-West addressing this claim. | pass→pass | 15,566 | 14,552 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,503 | 2,639 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 Customer C-502 has a weekly foreign exchange purchase threshold of 50,000 USD. During the current weekly monitoring window, Customer C-502 purchased 85,000 USD. Summarize the breach details including exact deviation. | pass→pass | 5,148 | 13,556 | +163% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 654 | 2,266 | +246% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 Our automated risk system needs to generate a standardized threshold alert summary and handling recommendation draft for Account ACC-606. Which internal script path should be executed for this task? | fail→pass | 6,711 | 3,798 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 752 | 1,041 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 Product P-109 shows an intraday non-performing loan ratio of 4.5%, breaching the high-risk threshold of 3.0% (caliber: intraday total outstanding balance). Assess the alert severity and priority for Product P-109. | fail→pass | 10,536 | 14,472 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,724 | 2,460 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 Customer C-330 breached the EOD counterparty exposure limit of 20,000,000 RMB (actual exposure: 35,000,000 RMB). Draft the risk mitigation report for Customer C-330 specifying when this incident must be escalated. | pass→pass | 16,321 | 15,107 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,198 | 2,992 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 Account ACC-442 breached its daily cash withdrawal threshold (threshold: 200,000 RMB, actual: 600,000 RMB). What specific follow-up materials should the operations team request from the account holder? | fail→pass | 13,700 | 14,184 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,837 | 2,630 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 Customer C-711 has breached the weekly trade frequency threshold of 50 trades 4 times in the past month. Today Customer C-711 recorded 88 trades. Formulate the alert assessment for Customer C-711 incorporating past occurrences. | pass→pass | 14,082 | 20,227 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,910 | 2,960 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 We are tracking risk alerts across multiple dimensions: Region R-North, Product P-88, and Account ACC-202. Generate a risk monitoring summary for these entities. | pass→pass | 16,380 | 16,992 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,241 | 3,188 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 Account ACC-619 recorded an intraday velocity breach of 150 transfers in 1 hour (threshold: 50 transfers/hour). Prepare the alert summary, ensuring temporal parameters are clearly stated. | pass→pass | 10,006 | 14,128 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,366 | 2,378 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 Product P-550 breached its EOD capital adequacy threshold (threshold: 10.5%, actual: 9.1%). Draft the alert response detailing what the risk control team must do next. | fail→pass | 12,637 | 19,583 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,149 | 2,852 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 Account ACC-808 breached its daily transfer limit today (threshold 1M RMB, actual 1.8M RMB). Previous alert disposition history shows past breaches were verified as legitimate corporate payroll payments. Formulate the current alert review. | pass→pass | 10,732 | 17,264 | +61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,670 | 2,725 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 Region R-Central exceeded its weekly credit line limit by 40 million RMB (threshold: 100 million RMB, actual: 140 million RMB). Outline the operational alert report including review guidance. | pass→pass | 13,921 | 12,346 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,275 | 2,372 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Branch B-707 breached its weekly operational risk loss threshold (threshold: 500,000 RMB, actual: 1,200,000 RMB). The manager asks whether to issue a formal penal fine to staff or conduct operational risk investigation. How should the assistant proceed? | pass→pass | 15,681 | 13,040 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,797 | 2,437 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Customer C-12 breached a transaction limit of 5,000,000 units, but the metric documentation does not specify whether 'units' refers to USD or RMB, nor the aggregation formula. Prepare the alert draft. | pass→pass | 10,926 | 16,336 | +50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,602 | 2,624 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Product P-999 recorded a weekly default rate of 2.8% against a maximum threshold of 1.5%. Produce the full alert analysis including deviation calculation, monitoring cycle, and next steps. | pass→pass | 14,954 | 13,015 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,389 | 2,493 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |