Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →anthropics/demand-intake
Pre-drafting context gathering for a demand letter — parties, facts, basis, leverage, BATNA, and privilege filters — written to a structured intake.md the demand-draft skill reads.
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 23 without it.
and 15 more in the full report
15 fixed4 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 15 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When saving an intake markdown file for slug `payment-acme-2025-03`, what exact confirmation sentence must be displayed to the user?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The confirmation sentence reads: 'Intake saved. Run `/litigation-legal:demand-draft payment-acme-2025-03` when ready.' | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md → demand-letter practice, landscape, risk calibration.--full).~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/demand-letters/[slug]/intake.md./litigation-legal:demand-draft [slug] when ready."The drafting is downstream. The value is in the pre-writing — forcing the questions a careless letter skips. Leverage, BATNA, downside tolerance, privilege filters, the actual audience. A demand letter sent without thinking about those is worse than no letter.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md → Demand-letter practice (insurance-tender timing, materiality threshold for matter creation, any seed-doc templates), landscape (counterparty type, repeat-adversary patterns), risk calibration (to pre-estimate materiality), house style. Tone, compliance period, marking, signer are NOT practice-level defaults — they are set per matter in the ## Posture for this matter step below.--full → run the complete intake regardless of materiality heuristics (for counsel who wants thorough every time)Posture for this matter. Demand-letter tone and terms are case-by-case, not a practice default. Ask:
- Tone: measured / assertive / aggressive? (depends on the relationship, the amount, and whether litigation is likely)
- Response window: what's reasonable given the claim? (14 days is common for payment demands; 30 days for cure; 7 days for cease-and-desist — but the contract or protocol may set it)
- Marking: does this need a "without prejudice" or "without prejudice save as to costs" marking? (settlement communications do; assertions of claim often don't; jurisdiction matters — ask if unsure)
- Signer: you, the client, the GC, instructed solicitor/counsel? Don't assume. Read the prior demand correspondence in the matter file if there is any — it establishes the register.
Record the answers in the intake under a ## Posture section before ## Parties. These answers govern the rest of the intake and the downstream draft — do not fall back to a practice-level default if the user left any of them blank; ask again.
test cases passed, vs 4 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.