Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens) for modeling sgRNA efficacy and gene essentiality. Use when analyzing multiple CRISPR screens simultaneously or when accounting for variable sgRNA efficiency across experiments.
.claude/skills/bio-crispr-screens-jacks-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: MAGeCK 0.5+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scipy 1.12+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Analyze multiple CRISPR screens jointly with JACKS" → Model sgRNA efficacy and gene essentiality simultaneously across multiple screens, accounting for variable guide efficiency.
jacks.infer_JACKS() for joint analysis across experimentsJACKS jointly models sgRNA efficacy and gene essentiality across multiple experiments. It infers both gene-level fitness effects and sgRNA-specific efficiency.
bashpip install jacks # or git clone https://github.com/felicityallen/JACKS.git cd JACKS && pip install -e .
# counts.txt (tab-separated)
sgRNA Gene Sample1 Sample2 Sample3 Control1 Control2
sgRNA1 GENE_A 100 120 90 80 85
sgRNA2 GENE_A 200 180 210 150 160
sgRNA3 GENE_B 50 45 55 60 58
...# replicatemap.txt
Sample1 Experiment1 Day14
Sample2 Experiment1 Day14
Sample3 Experiment2 Day14
Control1 Experiment1 Day0
Control2 Experiment2 Day0# guidemap.txt
sgRNA1 GENE_A
sgRNA2 GENE_A
sgRNA3 GENE_B
sgRNA4 GENE_B
...bash# Run JACKS python -m jacks.run_JACKS \ counts.txt \ replicatemap.txt \ guidemap.txt \ output_prefix \ --ctrl_sample_pattern "Day0" \ --ctrl_sample_pattern_column "Condition"
Goal: Run JACKS joint analysis to simultaneously model sgRNA efficacy and gene essentiality across experiments.
Approach: Load count data, guide-gene mapping, and replicate map; separate control and treatment samples; then run MCMC inference to estimate gene fitness effects and per-sgRNA efficiency.
pythonfrom jacks import infer import pandas as pd # Load data counts = pd.read_csv('counts.txt', sep='\t', index_col=0) guide_gene_map = pd.read_csv('guidemap.txt', sep='\t', header=None, names=['sgRNA', 'Gene']) replicate_map = pd.read_csv('replicatemap.txt', sep='\t', header=None, names=['Sample', 'Experiment', 'Condition']) # Separate control and treatment samples ctrl_samples = replicate_map[replicate_map['Condition'] == 'Day0']['Sample'].tolist() treatment_samples = replicate_map[replicate_map['Condition'] == 'Day14']['Sample'].tolist() # Run JACKS inference # n_iterations=10000: MCMC iterations. Increase for final analysis. # burn_in=1000: Burn-in period. Should be ~10% of iterations. jacks_results = infer.run_inference( counts, guide_gene_map, treatment_samples, ctrl_samples, n_iterations=10000, burn_in=1000 )
| File | Description | |------|-------------| | _gene_JACKS_results.txt | Gene-level essentiality scores | | _grna_JACKS_results.txt | sgRNA-level efficacy estimates | | _jacks_full_data.pickle | Full model for downstream analysis |
Goal: Classify genes as essential or enriched from JACKS output scores.
Approach: Load the gene results table, filter by JACKS score direction and FDR significance, and rank to identify top essential (negative effect) and enriched (positive effect) genes.
pythonimport pandas as pd import numpy as np # Load gene results genes = pd.read_csv('output_gene_JACKS_results.txt', sep='\t') # JACKS score: negative = essential (dropout), positive = enriched # Columns: gene, X1 (effect), X2 (std), fdr_log10 # Essential genes (significant negative effect) # fdr_threshold=-1: log10(FDR) < -1 means FDR < 0.1 essential = genes[(genes['X1'] < 0) & (genes['fdr_log10'] < -1)] essential = essential.sort_values('X1') print(f'Essential genes: {len(essential)}') print(essential.head(20)) # Enriched genes enriched = genes[(genes['X1'] > 0) & (genes['fdr_log10'] < -1)] enriched = enriched.sort_values('X1', ascending=False) print(f'Enriched genes: {len(enriched)}')
Goal: Assess sgRNA performance to identify low-efficacy guides for library optimization.
Approach: Load per-sgRNA efficacy estimates from JACKS output, flag guides below an efficacy threshold, and aggregate by gene to evaluate library-level guide quality.
pythonimport pandas as pd # Load sgRNA results guides = pd.read_csv('output_grna_JACKS_results.txt', sep='\t') # Efficacy scores range from 0 (ineffective) to 1 (highly effective) # X1 column contains efficacy estimates # Identify poor sgRNAs # efficacy<0.3: sgRNAs with low efficacy. Consider removal in future libraries. poor_guides = guides[guides['X1'] < 0.3] print(f'Low efficacy guides: {len(poor_guides)}') # Group by gene to assess library quality gene_efficacy = guides.groupby('Gene')['X1'].agg(['mean', 'std', 'count']) gene_efficacy = gene_efficacy.sort_values('mean') print(gene_efficacy.head(20))
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt import numpy as np genes = pd.read_csv('output_gene_JACKS_results.txt', sep='\t') fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 8)) # Color by significance colors = ['red' if fdr < -1 else 'gray' for fdr in genes['fdr_log10']] ax.scatter(genes['X1'], -genes['fdr_log10'], c=colors, alpha=0.5, s=10) ax.axhline(1, linestyle='--', color='black', alpha=0.5) # FDR = 0.1 ax.axvline(0, linestyle='-', color='gray', alpha=0.3) ax.set_xlabel('JACKS Score (negative = essential)') ax.set_ylabel('-log10(FDR)') ax.set_title('JACKS Gene Essentiality') # Label top hits top = genes[genes['fdr_log10'] < -2].nsmallest(10, 'X1') for _, row in top.iterrows(): ax.annotate(row['gene'], (row['X1'], -row['fdr_log10'])) plt.savefig('jacks_volcano.png', dpi=150)
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt guides = pd.read_csv('output_grna_JACKS_results.txt', sep='\t') plt.figure(figsize=(8, 5)) plt.hist(guides['X1'], bins=50, edgecolor='black') plt.axvline(0.5, color='red', linestyle='--', label='Efficacy = 0.5') plt.xlabel('sgRNA Efficacy') plt.ylabel('Count') plt.title('sgRNA Efficacy Distribution') plt.legend() plt.savefig('sgrna_efficacy.png', dpi=150)
JACKS strength is joint analysis across experiments.
python# Define multiple experiments in replicate map # replicatemap.txt: # Sample Experiment Condition # Screen1_T1 Screen1 Treatment # Screen1_T2 Screen1 Treatment # Screen1_C1 Screen1 Control # Screen2_T1 Screen2 Treatment # Screen2_T2 Screen2 Treatment # Screen2_C1 Screen2 Control # JACKS will learn shared sgRNA efficacy across screens # while estimating screen-specific gene effects
| Feature | JACKS | MAGeCK | |---------|-------|--------| | sgRNA efficacy modeling | Yes | No | | Multi-experiment joint analysis | Yes | Limited | | Statistical framework | Bayesian | MLE/RRA | | Speed | Slower | Faster | | Best for | Multiple screens | Single screen |
pythonfrom jacks import infer # Run with custom parameters results = infer.run_inference( counts, guide_gene_map, treatment_samples, ctrl_samples, n_iterations=50000, # 50000: Publication quality. 10000 for exploration. burn_in=5000, # 5000: 10% of iterations. apply_w_hp=True, # Hierarchical prior on efficacy fixed_w=False, # Learn sgRNA efficacy (set True to fix at 1) w_alpha=0.5, # Prior shape for efficacy w_beta=0.5 # Prior rate for efficacy )
pythonimport pandas as pd jacks = pd.read_csv('jacks_gene_results.txt', sep='\t') mageck = pd.read_csv('mageck.gene_summary.txt', sep='\t') # Merge results merged = pd.merge(jacks, mageck, left_on='gene', right_on='id') # Compare rankings from scipy.stats import spearmanr corr, pval = spearmanr(merged['X1'], merged['neg|score']) print(f'Spearman correlation: {corr:.3f} (p={pval:.2e})')
python# Extract high-efficacy guides for future libraries guides = pd.read_csv('output_grna_JACKS_results.txt', sep='\t') # efficacy>0.7: High efficacy sgRNAs for optimized libraries. good_guides = guides[guides['X1'] > 0.7][['sgRNA', 'Gene', 'X1']] good_guides.to_csv('high_efficacy_guides.csv', index=False)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.