Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, AOM format and length, abstract, anonymization for review, references, ethics/originality, and required files. Theory-only journal; there is no data-availability or replication step.
SkillScore88Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 8/15/2026
What it changes
Passed 22 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 25 without it.
Without skill76%
With skill88%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Uses the exact header token 【Scope】
Uses the exact header token 【Format】
Uses the exact header token 【Ethics】
and 4 more in the full report
4 fixed18 passed either way2 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+12 pp
Tokens
+36%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-33%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/15/2026v122 of 25 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 4
Prompt
I formatted my AMR theoretical manuscript using Arial 11pt font, single spacing to save space, and included running headers with page numbers on every page. Is this compliant with AMR formatting guidelines before ScholarOne submission?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Identifies that body text must be Times New Roman 12-point
Passed
Passed
States that the document must be double-spaced
Passed
Passed
Notes that page numbers must be removed
Missed
Passed
case-07 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/15/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md98 lines3 files
Pre-Submission Preflight (amr-submission)
AMR is theory-only. There is no dataset, code, or replication package to deposit. The
preflight centers on the theory paper's format, anonymization, and AOM ethics — not on
empirical materials.
When to trigger
"I'm about to submit to AMR"
Final check before clicking submit in ScholarOne
Unsure which files the portal expects for a conceptual paper
Pre-submission checklist
Scope & fit
The paper builds new theory (constructs / process model / reconceptualization), not an empirical study
It enters and "challenges and extends" a specific theoretical conversation
There is no data, no measures, no statistical test anywhere in the manuscript
Fit confirmed against the current AMR aims & scope (verify on the official page)
Format (verify exact current requirements on the AOM author page)
Manuscript is a Word file using Times New Roman 12-point body text, double spacing, 1-inch margins, and no page numbers or running heads
Title page separate from the manuscript body (for anonymous review)
Abstract present and no more than 200 words
Within the journal's overall length expectation (verify; AMR articles are full-length)
Figures meet AOM resolution/format specs; each is a conceptual model/typology, not a data plot
Propositions numbered consistently and matched to the figure
Anonymization for double-anonymous review
No author-identifying content in the manuscript body
Self-citations phrased neutrally ("prior work (Author, 2020)"), not "in our earlier paper"
Acknowledgments removed from the body (added after acceptance)
Funding/grant identifiers kept out of the body
Document file properties scrubbed of author name/affiliation
File names contain no author or institution name
References & citations
AOM author–date in-text citations; full reference list per the AOM Style Guide
Every in-text citation appears in the reference list and vice versa
The recent, live conversation in the target stream is cited, not only seminal works