Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/arsoc-revision
Use when responding to Editorial Committee and referee feedback on an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) review — coverage gaps, balance/accuracy complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the delivery preflight (arsoc-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (arsoc-organizing-framework).
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 17 of 22 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
4 fixed17 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In our review manuscript response, Referee 1 claims we mischaracterized their theoretical framework regarding institutional isomorphism. Should we defend our interpretation using general summaries or quote their original framing directly in our response?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Corrects the mischaracterization precisely using the author's own preferred framing. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
ARSoc revision asks cluster differently from primary-research asks. Triage every point into one bucket:
| Feedback type | Typical phrasing | Response move |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage gap | "you omit the X literature / author Y / the qualitative work" | almost always concede and integrate — place the missing work in the right framework cell; re-run saturation (arsoc-literature-synthesis) and update the coverage account |
| Balance / fairness | "this slights school Z / over-cites the author / dismisses method M" | steelman the slighted side; re-audit self-citation and method balance (arsoc-comprehensiveness-and-balance) |
| Appraisal accuracy | "you mischaracterize study W" | correct precisely; reviewed authors often referee — fix exactly |
| Framework / structure | "this is an annotated bibliography" | strengthen or make explicit the spine (arsoc-organizing-framework); do not just reorder paragraphs |
| Accessibility | "a sociologist outside the subfield can't follow Section 4" | add intuition, define jargon (arsoc-writing-style) |
| Scope | "too broad / too narrow / overruns length" | negotiate with the editor (arsoc-editor-strategy); rescope deliberately, within the envelope |
| Transparency | "how did you decide what to include?" | document/expand the coverage account (arsoc-transparency-and-reproducibility) |
Annual Review of Sociology revisions should make the sociology of the review visible: which subfields, methods, theoretical traditions, and evidentiary communities are being asked to recognize the synthesis as fair. Keep a ledger that distinguishes "we added citations" from "we repaired the review's sociological coverage contract."
| Revision pressure | Evidence to add or rebalance | Where it should show up |
|---|---|---|
| Subfield omission | missing conversation, classic line, or contemporary debate | coverage account plus framework cell |
| Method-siloing | qualitative, quantitative, comparative-historical, computational, or mixed-method evidence | method-balance table and synthesis text |
| Theory lineage dispute | genealogy of concepts, schools, and critiques | theory map, not only parenthetical citations |
| Positionality / power concern | whose standpoint, institution, or case is centered | appraisal paragraphs and limitations |
| Cross-subfield accessibility | translation of terms across adjacent sociological audiences | section openings and bridge sentences |
| Inclusion-rule opacity | search terms, boundary decisions, and excluded literatures | transparent coverage account |
Use this ledger before drafting the letter; it keeps the reply from sounding like a generic Annual
test cases passed, vs 17 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.