Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/cps-submission
Use when preparing the final Comparative Political Studies (CPS) submission package for SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — anonymization, word count, abstract, ORCID, title page, and data availability statement. Runs the submission preflight; it does not draft the manuscript.
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 22 without it.
and 14 more in the full report
11 fixed8 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are submitting our paper to Comparative Political Studies and looking for the submission portal. Should we log into Editorial Manager or OJS to upload our manuscript files?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Identifies SAGE Track (ScholarOne) as the official submission portal for Comparative Political Studies. | Passed | Passed |
| Notes that existing SAGE Track accounts can be reused for submission. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The last gate before SAGE Track. CPS desk-screens on fit and basics, so a clean, correctly anonymized, within-limit package avoids an avoidable bounce. Run this checklist against the live SAGE author instructions before you click submit — volatile specifics change.
| Component | Requirement (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准) |
|---|---|
| Portal | SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — reuse an existing account if you have reviewed/authored within the past year |
| Anonymized manuscript | Identifying info removed from the main file (sent to reviewers) |
| Title page (separate) | Authors, affiliations, contact, acknowledgments — kept off the review file |
| Word count | Article max 11,000 words; references, tables, figures excluded |
| Abstract | Unstructured, ~150 words between title and body |
| References | APA-style author-date (SAGE house); in-text and list agree |
| ORCID | Required for the submitting author; co-authors encouraged to link before acceptance |
| Data availability statement | Required — available where / why not shared |
| Replication materials | Quantitative papers: staged for the CPS Dataverse (gates final acceptance) |
| Pre-analysis plan | Optional, anonymized, as supplementary material |
| Supplementary / online appendix | Robustness grids and secondary material |
Before the formatting checklist, ask whether the review file still reads like a CPS paper after anonymization:
test cases passed, vs 8 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.