Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Unified team skill for plan-and-execute pipeline. Pure router — coordinator always. Beat model is coordinator-only in monitor.md. Triggers on "team planex".
.claude/skills/catlog22-team-planex/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 147% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 57% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 121% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 0% | 0% |
Unified team skill: plan-and-execute pipeline for issue-based development. Built on team-worker agent architecture — coordinator orchestrates, workers are team-worker agents loading role-specific instructions from roles/<role>/role.md.
Skill(skill="team-planex", args="task description")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+---------------+---------------+
v v
[planner] [executor]
(team-worker agent, (team-worker agent,
loads roles/planner/role.md) loads roles/executor/role.md)| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop | |------|------|--------|------------| | coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — | | planner | roles/planner/role.md | PLAN- | true | | executor | [roles/executor/role.md](roles/executor/role.md) | EXEC- | true |
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
--role <name> -> Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4--role -> roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry routerCoordinator is a PURE ORCHESTRATOR. It coordinates, it does NOT do.
Before calling ANY tool, apply this check:
| Tool Call | Verdict | Reason | |-----------|---------|--------| | spawn_agent, wait_agent, close_agent, send_message, followup_task | ALLOWED | Orchestration | | list_agents | ALLOWED | Agent health check | | request_user_input | ALLOWED | User interaction | | mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg | ALLOWED | Message bus | | Read/Write on .workflow/.team/ files | ALLOWED | Session state | | Read on roles/, commands/, specs/ | ALLOWED | Loading own instructions | | Read/Grep/Glob on project source code | BLOCKED | Delegate to worker | | Edit on any file outside .workflow/ | BLOCKED | Delegate to worker | | Bash("ccw cli ...") | BLOCKED | Only workers call CLI | | Bash running build/test/lint commands | BLOCKED | Delegate to worker |
If a tool call is BLOCKED: STOP. Create a task, spawn a worker.
No exceptions for "simple" tasks. Even a single-file read-and-report MUST go through spawn_agent.
PEX.workflow/.team/PEX-<date>-<slug>/ccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
spawn_agent({
agent_type: "team_worker",
task_name: "<task-id>",
fork_turns: "none",
message: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>
execution_method: <codex|gemini>
Read role_spec file (<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
## Task Context
task_id: <task-id>
title: <task-title>
description: <task-description>
pipeline_phase: <pipeline-phase>
## Upstream Context
<prev_context>`
})After spawning, use wait_agent({ timeout_ms: 1800000 }) to collect results. If result.timed_out, send STATUS_CHECK via followup_task (wait 3 min), then FINALIZE with interrupt (wait 3 min), then mark timed_out and close agents. Use close_agent({ target }) each worker.
| Role | model | reasoning_effort | Rationale | |------|-------|-------------------|-----------| | Planner (PLAN-) | (default) | high | Solution planning requires deep code analysis | | Executor (EXEC-) | (default) | high | Code implementation needs precision |
Override model/reasoning_effort in spawn_agent when cost optimization is needed:
spawn_agent({
agent_type: "team_worker",
task_name: "<task-id>",
fork_turns: "none",
model: "<model-override>",
reasoning_effort: "<effort-level>",
message: "..."
})| Command | Action | |---------|--------| | check / status | View execution status graph | | resume / continue | Advance to next step | | add <issue-ids or --text '...' or --plan path> | Append new tasks to planner queue |
.workflow/.team/PEX-<slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>/
├── .msg/
│ ├── messages.jsonl # Message bus log
│ └── meta.json # Session state
├── task-analysis.json # Coordinator analyze output
├── artifacts/
│ └── solutions/ # Planner solution output per issue
│ ├── <issueId-1>.json
│ └── <issueId-N>.json
└── wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge
├── learnings.md
├── decisions.md
├── conventions.md
└── issues.md| Intent | API | Example | |--------|-----|---------| | Send plan updates to running executor | send_message | Queue planner solution details to EXEC- workers | | Not used in this skill | followup_task | No resident agents -- planner and executor are one-shot | | Check running agents | list_agents | Verify planner/executor health during resume |
Plan-and-execute is a Two-Phase pattern: planner creates solution plans (PLAN-), then coordinator spawns executors (EXEC-) for each planned issue. The planner may dynamically create EXEC- task entries in tasks.json.
// Phase 1: Planner runs, creates EXEC-* tasks in tasks.json
spawn_agent({ agent_type: "team_worker", task_name: "PLAN-001", ... })
wait_agent({ timeout_ms: 1800000 }) // 30 min — apply timeout cascade if timed_out
// Phase 2: Executors run per-issue, may run in sequence or parallel
// Inner loop: planner/executor handle multiple tasks internallyUse list_agents({}) in handleResume and handleComplete:
// Reconcile session state with actual running agents
const running = list_agents({})
// Compare with tasks.json active_agents
// Reset orphaned tasks (in_progress but agent gone) to pendingWorkers are spawned with task_name: "<task-id>" enabling direct addressing:
send_message({ target: "EXEC-001", message: "..." }) -- queue plan solution to running executorclose_agent({ target: "PLAN-001" }) -- cleanup by name after completion| Scenario | Resolution | |----------|------------| | Unknown command | Error with available command list | | Role not found | Error with role registry | | Role spec file not found | Error with expected path (roles/<name>/role.md) | | team-worker agent unavailable | Error: requires .claude/agents/team-worker.md | | Planner issue planning failure | Retry once, then skip to next issue | | Executor impl failure | Report to coordinator, continue with next EXEC- task | | Pipeline stall | Coordinator monitors, escalate to user | | Worker no response | Report waiting task, suggest user resume |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | 12,869 | 6,415 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,462 | 2,426 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 7,265 | 9,940 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,220 | 2,823 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 27,514 | 7,325 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,017 | 2,367 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 17,059 | 8,970 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,262 | 2,430 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 13,157 | 6,089 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,456 | 2,343 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 4,290 | 6,287 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 235 | 2,537 | +980% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 3,828 | 4,842 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 577 | 2,264 | +292% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 8,069 | 9,673 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,300 | 3,213 | +147% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 25,887 | 6,865 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,122 | 3,325 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 4,896 | 7,132 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,107 | 2,540 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 12,390 | 5,541 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,076 | 2,992 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 7,256 | 2,770 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,166 | 2,573 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 4,906 | 6,716 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 786 | 2,568 | +227% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 12,501 | 1,467 | -88% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,228 | 2,234 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 13,749 | 2,488 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,396 | 2,263 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 9,413 | 2,253 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 2,402 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 18,320 | 14,244 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,082 | 3,916 | +88% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 9,502 | 2,076 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,409 | 2,394 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 5,801 | 1,730 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,008 | 2,317 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 14,208 | 6,595 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,215 | 2,497 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 8,820 | 7,814 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,427 | 3,562 | +150% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→fail | 8,318 | 6,857 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,710 | 2,521 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 11 counted toward the lift figure. The other 11 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 11 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/3/2026 | +24% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.