Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Unified team skill for issue resolution. Uses team-worker agent architecture with role directories for domain logic. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Triggers on "team issue".
.claude/skills/team-issue/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Orchestrate issue resolution pipeline: explore context -> plan solution -> review (optional) -> marshal queue -> implement. Supports Quick, Full, and Batch pipelines with review-fix cycle.
Skill(skill="team-issue", args="<issue-ids> [--mode=<mode>]")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- clarify -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+-------+
v v v v v
[explor] [plann] [review] [integ] [imple]| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop | |------|------|--------|------------| | coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — | | explorer | roles/explorer/role.md | EXPLORE- | false | | planner | [roles/planner/role.md](roles/planner/role.md) | SOLVE- | false | | reviewer | roles/reviewer/role.md | AUDIT- | false | | integrator | [roles/integrator/role.md](roles/integrator/role.md) | MARSHAL- | false | | implementer | roles/implementer/role.md | BUILD- | false |
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
--role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4--role → @roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry routerTISL.workflow/.team/TISL-<slug>-<date>/issueccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "issue",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: false
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})Parallel spawn (Batch mode, N explorer or M implementer instances):
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
name: "<role>-<N>",
team_name: "issue",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue
requirement: <task-description>
agent_name: <role>-<N>
inner_loop: false
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery, owner=<role>-<N>) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})| Command | Action | |---------|--------| | check / status | View execution status graph, no advancement | | resume / continue | Check worker states, advance next step |
.workflow/.team/TISL-<slug>-<date>/
├── session.json # Session metadata + pipeline + fix_cycles
├── task-analysis.json # Coordinator analyze output
├── .msg/
│ ├── messages.jsonl # Message bus log
│ └── meta.json # Session state + cross-role state
├── wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge
│ ├── learnings.md
│ ├── decisions.md
│ ├── conventions.md
│ └── issues.md
├── explorations/ # Explorer output
│ └── context-<issueId>.json
├── solutions/ # Planner output
│ └── solution-<issueId>.json
├── audits/ # Reviewer output
│ └── audit-report.json
├── queue/ # Integrator output (also .workflow/issues/queue/)
└── builds/ # Implementer output| Scenario | Resolution | |----------|------------| | Unknown command | Error with available command list | | Role not found | Error with role registry | | CLI tool fails | Worker fallback to direct implementation | | Fast-advance conflict | Coordinator reconciles on next callback | | Completion action fails | Default to Keep Active | | Review rejection exceeds 2 rounds | Force convergence to integrator | | No issues found for given IDs | Coordinator reports error to user | | Deferred BUILD count unknown | Defer to MARSHAL callback |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +59 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.