Use to track enrichment provider success, cost, latency, and quality trends.
NewMaintained
Automatic
◆Sales & GTM pack
Last verified 8/23/2026
What it changes
Passed 8 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 21 without it.
Without skill63%
With skill38%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
includes credit burn rate as an evaluation metric
includes data confidence score as an evaluation metric
uses a Jira task template for provider improvement tasks
and 1 more in the full report
3 fixed10 passed either way5 still failing4 broke
Pass-rate lift
-25 pp
Tokens
-3%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-9%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/23/2026v113 of 22 cases passed with skill · 21 comparable
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 3
Prompt
We are setting up a monthly performance review for our B2B contact enrichment providers (ZoomInfo, Cognism, Apollo). The team wants to track only raw API response latency and cost per call. What specific operational metrics should be included in our evaluation framework to assess overall data quality and consumption efficiency?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
includes fill percentage as an evaluation metric
Passed
Passed
includes credit burn rate as an evaluation metric
Missed
Passed
includes data confidence score as an evaluation metric
Missed
Passed
case-01 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/23/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md25 linessingle file
Provider Scorecard Skill
When to Use
Monthly/weekly ops reviews of enrichment vendors.
Before renewing contracts or adjusting credit allocations.
After outages or performance regressions to inform routing changes.