Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Verify that a penetration test has explicit, written, signed authorization before any scanning begins. Reads a Rules-of- Engagement (ROE) attestation file, validates required fields (authorizer, in-scope targets, time window, emergency contact, signature), checks the signer against an allowlist, and emits a CRITICAL finding if anything is missing. Designed as the first skill the orchestrator routes to. Use when: starting a new engagement, after a scope change, or before any cluster 1-4 scan skil
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 39% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 142% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 36% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -4% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 94% | 0% |
Penetration testing is computer access. Without explicit authorization from the owner of the system under test, that access is a crime — Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the US, Computer Misuse Act in the UK, equivalent laws everywhere else. The line between an authorized pentester and an unauthorized attacker is one signature on one document.
The penetration-tester pack's other skills (TLS analysis, CORS audit, dependency CVE scan, etc.) all assume that line has been crossed correctly. This skill is the first gate the orchestrator routes to. It refuses to declare an engagement authorized until a Rules of Engagement (ROE) attestation file exists, is signed, and contains the fields any real-world legal review will look for.
This is not paranoia or paperwork theater. Engagements DO go sideways: scope creeps mid-test, a tester probes an out-of-scope adjacent system, an SOC team escalates a "real" attack to legal, and the question "show us the ROE" comes up. If the ROE is in order, the answer is "here it is." If not, the conversation gets expensive fast.
| Finding | Severity | Threshold | Affected control | |---|---|---|---| | ROE file missing | CRITICAL | No attestation file at the expected path | (legal) | | Required field missing | CRITICAL | authorizer, in_scope_targets, time_window, emergency_contact, or signature absent | (legal) | | Signature missing | CRITICAL | No signature_block in ROE | (legal) | | Signer not in allowlist | CRITICAL | signer email/key id not in .allowed-authorizers | (legal) | | Time window expired | HIGH | current time outside time_window.start / time_window.end | (legal) | | Time window not yet active | HIGH | current time before time_window.start | (legal) | | In-scope target list empty | HIGH | in_scope_targets field present but empty | (legal) | | Out-of-scope override (manual flag) | MEDIUM | tester requests a target not in the in-scope list | (legal) | | Stale ROE (>30 days from sign date) | MEDIUM | last_signed_at older than 30 days; suggests refresh | (operational) | | ROE present + signed + in window | INFO | All gates pass; engagement is authorized | (positive confirmation) |
./roe.yaml (or pass --roe FILE)..allowed-authorizers file listing email addresses orGPG key fingerprints permitted to sign ROEs.
yamlengagement_id: ACME-2026-Q2-PENTEST-001 authorizer: name: Jane Doe email: jane.doe@acme.example role: CISO organization: ACME Corp in_scope_targets: - host: app.acme.example notes: production web app, full-stack pentest authorized - host: api.acme.example - cidr: 10.50.0.0/16 notes: internal corporate range out_of_scope_targets: - host: payments.acme.example reason: PCI scope, separate authz required - cidr: 10.99.0.0/16 reason: production database tier, separate authz required time_window: start: 2026-06-01T00:00:00Z end: 2026-06-30T23:59:59Z emergency_contact: name: SOC On-Call phone: "+1-555-555-5555" email: soc@acme.example rules: - No exploitation of confirmed findings without written prompt approval - No password cracking against production accounts - All testing pauses on declared business-hours blackouts signature_block: signer: jane.doe@acme.example signed_at: 2026-05-30T14:22:00Z signature: | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- ... -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
The skill looks for ./roe.yaml by default. Override with --roe FILE. The ROE file should live with the engagement artifacts, NOT in the repo under test — typical layout is engagements/<client>-<date>/roe.yaml.
bashpython3 ./scripts/check_authorization.py --roe engagements/acme-2026-q2/roe.yaml
Options:
Usage: check_authorization.py [OPTIONS]
Options:
--roe FILE Path to ROE attestation YAML (default: ./roe.yaml)
--allowed FILE Path to allowed-authorizers list (default: .allowed-authorizers)
--check-target HOST Verify HOST is in the in-scope list (repeatable)
--output FILE Write findings to FILE
--format FMT json | jsonl | markdown (default: markdown)
--min-severity SEV Default infoCRITICAL = engagement is NOT authorized. Halt all testing immediately. Resolve the missing requirement before any further skill runs.
HIGH = the engagement was authorized at some point but the current state is out-of-window. Either extend the time window with a new signature or wait.
MEDIUM = operational concerns that warrant attention but don't block testing. A stale ROE should be refreshed; a manual out-of-scope target request needs explicit additional authz.
INFO = positive confirmation that the engagement is authorized.
The skill's output IS the authorization record. Save the markdown report alongside the ROE itself; it becomes part of the engagement evidence chain (see recording-pentest-engagement for the storage pattern).
bashpython3 ./scripts/check_authorization.py --roe engagements/acme-2026-q2/roe.yaml --format markdown # If exit code != 0, halt testing.
bashpython3 ./scripts/check_authorization.py \ --roe engagements/acme-2026-q2/roe.yaml \ --check-target app.acme.example \ --check-target api.acme.example
The skill returns an explicit INFO Finding per target if all checks pass, and a HIGH/CRITICAL Finding per target if any are out-of-scope.
bashpython3 ./scripts/check_authorization.py --roe engagements/acme-2026-q2/roe.yaml \ --format json \ --output engagements/acme-2026-q2/evidence/authz-check-$(date +%Y%m%d).json
JSON / JSONL / Markdown per lib/report.py. Exit codes: 0 clean, 1 high/critical (engagement NOT authorized), 2 error.
Each Finding includes:
id — authz::<field> or authz::target::<target>severity — CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / INFOcategory — engagement-authorizationsummary — what's missing or wrongevidence — engagement_id, authorizer email, time window, targeterror and exits 2.
(allowlist is recommended but not required) and proceeds with field-level verification only.
finding flagging the issue; does NOT attempt to verify cryptographically (separate gpg --verify step recommended for signature validation; this skill validates the structural presence and signer-identity claim).
references/THEORY.md — Why pentest authorization is a legalprimitive (CFAA, CMA, equivalent statutes), ROE structure history (OSSTMM / PTES origins), signature options (PGP / S/MIME / DocuSign), scope-creep failure modes
references/PLAYBOOK.md — ROE templates per engagement type(external pentest, internal pentest, red team, purple team), authorization escalation flow, time-window extension procedures, emergency-stop protocol
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.