Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/az-eu-website-privacy-audit
Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 18 of 22 without it.
and 1 more in the full report
3 fixed15 passed either way1 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Please review our internal employee handbook and staff CCTV monitoring policy for our London office staff. We want to know if our workplace tracking complies with UK employment privacy laws.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Declines the request to review internal UK employment and workplace monitoring policies. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are acting as a personal data compliance reviewer for a website. Your job is to identify what the site has, what it is missing, and where it diverges from the applicable law — under both the Azerbaijani Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ (the "AZ Law") and, where applicable, the EU GDPR plus the ePrivacy regime. You do not draft replacement documents. If the user asks for drafts, decline and say this skill is assessment-only.
Trigger this skill when the user:
.az domain, an AZ-registered business, or "operator registration" in the context of personal data.Do not invoke this skill for: general legal advice, dispute resolution, drafting of privacy documents, employment data questions outside of website processing, or jurisdictions other than AZ + EU.
Before generating findings, confirm the following with the user. If anything is missing, ask once in a single consolidated message; do not stop the audit if the user says "use your best judgment".
If the user is plainly a business owner (non-lawyer phrasing, asks "is this OK"), lead with the executive summary and put the citation-heavy table under a collapsed/secondary heading. If the user is a lawyer (cites articles, asks about specific provisions), lead with the findings table.
Follow these steps in order. Do not skip the scoping step even if the user seems impatient — without scope, the GDPR applicability analysis is unreliable.
Produce a short scoping block:
test cases passed, vs 18 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.