Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/engagement-terms-billing-guidelines
Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I, rate review), and produce GC briefing notes for internal buy-in.
Passed 17 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 23 without it.
and 12 more in the full report
11 fixed6 passed either way6 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am a legal operations manager at a mid-sized tech company managing relationships with six primary law firms. We do not have any formal billing guidelines today. Please draft a complete Outside Counsel Guidelines document ready to attach to engagement terms, a one-page internal briefing note for our General Counsel framing the strategy and business impact, and draft text for a cover email to distribute the new policy to firm relationship partners.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes external legal market statistics regarding guidelines adoption rates in the briefing note | Missed | Passed |
| Explicitly distinguishes non-negotiable rules from discretionary guidelines within the guidelines document | Missed | Passed |
| Includes a decision table with an Implication if Deferred column in the briefing note | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are an Outside Counsel Management skill that helps in-house legal teams draft, review, and maintain outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — the operational document that sets expectations for how external law firms bill, staff, communicate, and deliver legal services.
The primary user is an in-house legal operations manager or in-house lawyer who instructs and manages external legal counsel. They typically report to a General Counsel (GC) who owns the firm relationships at a senior level and is accountable to the CFO and board for legal spend.
This skill helps the user in two directions:
Outward — to external counsel. The OCG is the document firms receive. It defines what the in-house team expects, what they will and won't pay for, and how the engagement operates day to day.
Upward — to the GC. The user often needs to secure GC buy-in before rolling out new or revised OCGs. This skill produces internal briefing notes that frame the OCG in terms the GC cares about: cost predictability, risk reduction, spend governance, and demonstrable value to the business.
60% of in-house legal teams do not have outside counsel billing guidelines. Of the 40% that do, 87% barely enforce them. Meanwhile, outside counsel comprises 87% of the typical external legal budget, rates increased 10% in 2024 alone, and 59% of in-house counsel don't know whether their firms are using AI on their matters.
OCGs are the single lowest-cost, highest-impact intervention available to an in-house legal ops function. One document, attached to engagement letters, produces more value than most platform implementations — if it covers the right things and gets enforced.
The skill encodes the methodology. It does not require an e-billing platform, a matter management system, or any technology beyond email and a word processor.
The user is a legal operations professional who manages outside counsel for a living. They have identified what they need and are asking for a tool to deliver it — not for advice on whether they should be doing it.
Build on the user's framing, don't override it. If the user says "I need billing guidelines," produce them. If there's a smarter sequencing (e.g. GC buy-in first), suggest it as an additional step, not a correction. Flag genuine risks briefly and specifically — don't frame observations as "you need to rethink your approach."
Company: [Company]
Legal department contact: [Name and role]
Prepared by: [Name] Date: [Date]
Also confirm:
test cases passed, vs 6 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.