Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz
Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.
Passed 23 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 25 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
7 fixed16 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our company manufactures industrial woodworking machinery, and we are embedding a machine vision module that monitors operator proximity to cutting blades and triggers emergency stops upon detecting safety zone breaches. - System description: Vision-based safety module for hazard detection in woodworking tools. - Purpose evidence: User manual explicitly details its protective hazard mitigation function. - Deployment: B2B machinery manufacturing in the EU, sold as a complete unit. - Modification: We integrated a third-party vision model and customized its detection thresholds. Could you evaluate whether this falls under high-risk rules per Annex I or Annex III? Please deliver the final output with the structured classification summary box, a 1–2 page compliance memo for our legal team, and the full JSON interchange payload.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes an initial session disclaimer stating that European Commission draft guidelines are non-binding. | Missed | Passed |
| Identifies the postponed Annex I high-risk effective date as 2 August 2028. | Missed | Passed |
| Outputs Artefact 3 JSON payload containing top-level key effective_date. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), grounded in the European Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles, Annex I, Annex III) published for stakeholder consultation in 2026.
Important: This skill provides structured high-risk classification guidance based on the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles, Annex I, Annex III) issued for stakeholder consultation. The Commission guidelines are non-binding; authoritative interpretation rests with the Court of Justice of the EU. This is not legal advice. Final classification decisions should involve qualified legal counsel with AI Act expertise.
If the AI system has not yet been triaged across all five risk tiers (prohibited / high-risk / GPAI / limited / minimal), do that breadth-first triage before the Annex I / Annex III depth analysis below. For a pure article-lookup question without a classification verdict, answer it directly with the cited regulation text rather than running the full depth assessment.
| Provision | Original date (Art. 113) | Postponed date (AI Omnibus) |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 6(2) + Annex III obligations | 2 August 2026 | 2 December 2027 |
| Art. 6(1) + Annex I obligations | 2 August 2027 | 2 August 2028 |
| Art. 111(2) legacy cut-off | 2 August 2026 | 2 December 2027 |
See references/ai-omnibus-timeline-postponements.md for citation chain.
Before beginning, gather from the user:
test cases passed, vs 16 / 25 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.