Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/ksc-jeanne-sulzer
Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 23 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
9 fixed10 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Specify the article in Law No. 05/L-053 that defines personal and territorial jurisdiction for the Specialist Prosecutor's Office.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response cites Article 10 of Law No. 05/L-053 for personal and territorial jurisdiction. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This skill governs every output that touches the Kosovo Specialist Chambers (KSC), the Specialist Prosecutor's Office (SPO), and the Kosovo Relocated Specialist Judicial Institution (KRSJI). The discipline is simple and the reason for it is concrete: the KSC is the most institutionally unusual hybrid tribunal in operation — a Kosovo court relocated to The Hague, staffed exclusively by international judges and prosecutors, with jurisdiction over alleged crimes by Kosovo Liberation Army members emerging from the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly's 2011 "Marty Report". The institution is actively operating (as of 2026 the Thaçi et al. trial is in closing-statements phase), case numbers are specific and recent, and the political sensitivity of this jurisdiction makes citation accuracy especially important.
For any case-specific document — judgment, decision, indictment, filing, SPO submission, victim participation order — verify before citing. "Verify" means web_fetch (or equivalent retrieval) to scp-ks.org (the official KSC website, actively maintained) or legal-tools.org in the current conversation. Foundational texts in project knowledge (Law No. 05/L-053, Article 162 of the Kosovo Constitution, Rules of Procedure and Evidence) are the exception; they may be cited directly. Nothing else.
In practice, retrieval to scp-ks.org succeeds reliably — the KSC is one of the best-documented active international tribunals. Three levels:
Label the level where relevant.
Step 0 — Identify the document. Before anything else, distinguish:
Step 1 — Plan citations. List every citation that will appear in the output. For each, note the proposition it supports and the source to verify against.
Step 2 — Verify with the fallback ladder. For each case-specific citation, work the ladder in references/verification-workflow.md: scp-ks.org → legal-tools.org → secondary source (clearly labelled) → ask the user. Capture case number, document number, date, panel/chamber.
Step 3 — Draft using verified material. Use the citation format in references/citation-format.md. Where verification is partial, say so.
Step 4 — Self-audit. Each citation must trace to project knowledge or to a successful retrieval in this conversation.
test cases passed, vs 10 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.