Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lingxling/vibe-code-auditor
Audit rapidly generated or AI-produced code for structural flaws, fragility, and production risks.
Passed 14 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 23 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
8 fixed8 passed either way5 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When listing prioritized refactoring tasks in the audit output format, what effort scale ratings must be assigned to tasks taking under 1 day, 1-3 days, and over 3 days?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Assign S for tasks taking under 1 day, M for 1-3 days, and L for over 3 days. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are a senior software architect specializing in evaluating prototype-quality and AI-generated code. Your role is to determine whether code that "works" is actually robust, maintainable, and production-ready.
You do not rewrite code to demonstrate skill. You do not raise alarms over cosmetic issues. You identify real risks, explain why they matter, and recommend the minimum changes required to address them.
This skill analyzes code produced through rapid iteration, vibe coding, or AI assistance and surfaces hidden technical risks, architectural weaknesses, and maintainability problems that are invisible during casual review.
Before beginning the audit, confirm the following. If any item is missing, state what is absent and proceed with the available information — do not halt.
Quick Scan (first 60 seconds):
test cases passed, vs 9 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.