Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Covers Annex VIII classification rules, Annex II/III technical files, Annex XIV clinical evaluation, and EUDAMED integration.
.claude/skills/mdr-745-specialist/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
EU MDR compliance patterns for medical device classification, technical documentation, and clinical evidence.
Classify device under MDR Annex VIII:
| Factor | Class I | Class IIa | Class IIb | Class III | |--------|---------|-----------|-----------|-----------| | Duration | Any | Short-term | Long-term | Long-term | | Invasiveness | Non-invasive | Body orifice | Surgical | Implantable | | System | Any | Non-critical | Critical organs | CNS/cardiac | | Risk | Lowest | Low-medium | Medium-high | Highest |
| Information Use | Condition Severity | Class | |-----------------|-------------------|-------| | Informs decision | Non-serious | IIa | | Informs decision | Serious | IIb | | Drives/treats | Critical | III |
Example 1: Absorbable Surgical Suture
Example 2: AI Diagnostic Software
Example 3: Cardiac Pacemaker
Prepare technical file per Annex II and III:
ANNEX II TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
├── Device description and UDI-DI
├── Label and instructions for use
├── Design and manufacturing info
├── GSPR compliance matrix
├── Benefit-risk analysis
├── Verification and validation
└── Clinical evaluation report| Requirement | Evidence | Status | |-------------|----------|--------| | Safe design (GSPR 1-3) | Risk management file | ☐ | | Chemical properties (GSPR 10.1) | Biocompatibility report | ☐ | | Infection risk (GSPR 10.2) | Sterilization validation | ☐ | | Software requirements (GSPR 17) | IEC 62304 documentation | ☐ | | Labeling (GSPR 23) | Label artwork, IFU | ☐ |
| Class | Route | NB Involvement | |-------|-------|----------------| | I | Annex II self-declaration | None | | Is/Im | Annex II + IX/XI | Sterile/measuring aspects | | IIa | Annex II + IX or XI | Product or QMS | | IIb | Annex IX + X or X + XI | Type exam + production | | III | Annex IX + X | Full QMS + type exam |
Develop clinical evidence strategy per Annex XIV:
| Class | Minimum Evidence | Investigation | |-------|------------------|---------------| | I | Risk-benefit analysis | Not typically required | | IIa | Literature + post-market | May be required | | IIb | Systematic literature review | Often required | | III | Comprehensive clinical data | Required (Article 61) |
CER CONTENTS
├── Executive summary
├── Device scope and intended purpose
├── Clinical background (state of the art)
├── Literature search methodology
├── Data appraisal and analysis
├── Safety and performance conclusions
├── Benefit-risk determination
└── PMCF plan summaryEstablish PMS system per Chapter VII:
| Component | Requirement | Frequency | |-----------|-------------|-----------| | PMS Plan | Article 84 | Maintain current | | PSUR | Class IIa and higher | Per class schedule | | PMCF Plan | Annex XIV Part B | Update with CER | | PMCF Report | Annex XIV Part B | Annual (Class III) | | Vigilance | Articles 87-92 | As events occur |
| Class | Frequency | |-------|-----------| | Class III | Annual | | Class IIb implantable | Annual | | Class IIb | Every 2 years | | Class IIa | When necessary |
| Timeline | Requirement | |----------|-------------| | 2 days | Serious public health threat | | 10 days | Death or serious deterioration | | 15 days | Other serious incidents |
Implement UDI system per Article 27:
| Module | Content | Actor | |--------|---------|-------| | Actor | Company registration | Manufacturer, AR | | UDI/Device | Device and variant data | Manufacturer | | Certificates | NB certificates | Notified Body | | Clinical Investigation | Study registration | Sponsor | | Vigilance | Incident reports | Manufacturer | | Market Surveillance | Authority actions | Competent Authority |
Required elements per Article 13:
references/mdr-classification-guide.md contains:
references/clinical-evidence-requirements.md contains:
references/technical-documentation-templates.md contains:
bash# Quick gap analysis python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --device "Device Name" --class IIa # JSON output for integration python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --device "Device Name" --class III --output json # Interactive assessment python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --interactive
Analyzes device against MDR requirements, identifies compliance gaps, generates prioritized recommendations.
Output includes:
| Factor | Considerations | |--------|----------------| | Designation scope | Covers your device type | | Capacity | Timeline for initial audit | | Geographic reach | Markets you need to access | | Technical expertise | Experience with your technology | | Fee structure | Transparency, predictability |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-25 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +12 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.