Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Danh gia hieu suat thanh vien team marketing dua tren data: KPI scorecard theo role, strengths co vi du that, areas for improvement, development plan 30-90 ngay, rubric 1-5. Dung khi nhac 'danh gia nhan vien', 'performance review', 'review nhan su', '1:1 review thang', 'nguoi nay perform the nao'.
.claude/skills/minhnv0807-65-team-performance-review/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 39% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 26% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 85% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 90% | 0% |
> Review khong phai de cham diem — de nguoi do biet can lam gi de gioi hon. Feedback khong co data la y kien chu quan; feedback co data la coaching. Khong duoc co bat ngo trong review: feedback phai duoc noi lien tuc trong ky, review chi la tong ket.
Doc lich su brief (64-team-brief), output ky truoc, va report (07-bao-cao-marketing) neu co. Neu thieu, hoi toi da 4 cau:
| Role | KPI dinh luong | KPI dinh tinh | |------|----------------|---------------| | Content writer | So bai/thang, on-time rate, so lan sua/bai, engagement rate bai minh viet | Bam brand voice, do sac cua goc, chu dong de xuat angle | | Designer | So asset/thang, on-time rate, ti le asset duyet lan dau, diem design review | Hieu brief, tuan thu brand guideline, xu ly asset gap | | Media buyer | CPL vs target, ROAS, ti le camp dat KPI, tan suat toi uu | Ky luat tracking, chat luong test log, chu dong bao rui ro | | Channel operator | SLA phan hoi, ti le kenh setup dung checklist, open/read rate | Xu ly su co, phoi hop cheo phong ban |
Neu dau ky khong set KPI cho role, viec dau tien sau review la set KPI cho ky sau — khong danh gia nguoi bang tieu chuan ho chua tung biet.
markdown# Performance Review — [Ten] — [Ky] Role: [role] · Reviewer: [leader] · Ngay: [date] ## I. KPI Scorecard | KPI da set | Target | Thuc te | % Dat | Ghi chu | |------------|--------|---------|-------|---------| | [KPI 1 theo role] | | | | | | [KPI 2] | | | | | | On-time delivery rate | | | | | | So lan sua / task | | | | | Tong ket KPI: Dat / Gan dat / Khong dat — kem so cu the. ## II. Strengths trong ky | Diem manh | Vi du cu the (ngay + tinh huong) | Impact len team/KPI | |-----------|----------------------------------|---------------------| ## III. Can cai thien | Hang muc | Hanh vi quan sat duoc | Impact thuc te | Ky vong cu the | |----------|----------------------|----------------|----------------| ## IV. Development plan Muc tieu 30 ngay: - [ ] [Skill hoac hanh vi cu the, do duoc] Muc tieu 90 ngay: - [ ] [...] Ho tro tu leader: [training, tai lieu, tan suat check-in] ## V. Feedback tu nhan vien - Ho thay minh dong gop duoc gi trong ky? - Ho can ho tro gi tu leader? - Dang bi chan boi dieu gi ma leader chua biet? - Muon phat trien theo huong nao? ## VI. Rating tong hop | Tieu chi | Diem 1-5 | Nhan xet | |----------|----------|----------| | Chat luong output | | | | Dung han | | | | Chu dong | | | | Giao tiep/phoi hop | | | | Toc do hoc va cai thien | | | | **Tong the** | | | Thang diem: 1 = can cai thien nhieu · 3 = dap ung ky vong · 5 = vuot ky vong. ## VII. Next steps - [ ] Gui tai lieu cho nguoi duoc review trong 24h sau buoi 1:1 - [ ] Set nhac follow-up sau 30 ngay - [ ] Neu co dieu chinh thu nhap: ghi ro muc va ngay hieu luc
| Thoi luong | Noi dung | |------------|----------| | 5 phut | Hoi ho tu danh gia ky nay truoc | | 20 phut | Cung doc KPI va data | | 20 phut | Strengths + areas for improvement, nghe phan hoi cua ho | | 10 phut | Development plan — thao luan de ho dong y, khong ap dat | | 5 phut | Feedback cua ho danh cho leader |
Leader chuan bi tai lieu truoc buoi hop, khong viet live trong luc hop.
64-team-brief: nguon du lieu on-time rate va so lan sua/task.62-marketing-review va 47-design-review: diem duyet output lam bang chung dinh luong.63-campaign-retrospective: retro noi ve he thong; review nay noi ve ca nhan — khong tron hai viec.07-bao-cao-marketing: ket qua kenh/campaign ho phu trach.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 21,651 | 26,029 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,905 | 5,441 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 54,916 | 30,353 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,787 | 5,842 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 42,088 | 40,963 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,306 | 5,410 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 46,206 | 37,777 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,150 | 5,561 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 21,654 | 19,614 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,151 | 4,608 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 22,981 | 27,902 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,859 | 5,399 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 17,928 | 21,038 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,739 | 5,071 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 17,146 | 17,222 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,780 | 3,639 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 26,769 | 13,025 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,461 | 4,004 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 17,748 | 15,821 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,057 | 3,916 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 21,701 | 15,346 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,868 | 4,475 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 15,603 | 21,279 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,633 | 3,993 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 18,782 | 19,520 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,392 | 4,019 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,279 | 8,252 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,947 | 3,109 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 25,690 | 22,872 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,289 | 4,393 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 16,567 | 17,356 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,650 | 3,563 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 21,645 | 16,149 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,862 | 3,620 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 27,324 | 21,133 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,642 | 4,847 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 13,360 | 15,671 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,202 | 3,260 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 21,075 | 18,255 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,451 | 4,149 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 18,825 | 12,585 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,251 | 3,772 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 16,252 | 3,778 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,901 | 2,290 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +59 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.