Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Look up word definitions, pronunciation, etymology and synonyms with zero API keys — the Free Dictionary API via curl, with honest handling of words it doesn't know. Use when asked define a word, how do you pronounce this, what's the origin of a word, or synonyms for something. Produces the definition set organized by part of speech, IPA pronunciation with audio link, and the rerunnable command — with the model's own knowledge clearly separated from the fetched source.
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-dictionary-lookup/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 22% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 91% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 341% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 79% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 105% | 0% |
A dictionary lookup sounds like something a language model shouldn't need — until the question is "is this actually a word," "what's the IPA," or "give me a citable source," where fetched beats recalled. The Free Dictionary API answers over keyless HTTPS with definitions, phonetics, audio, and origins. This skill fetches, formats by part of speech, and keeps a clean line between what the source says and what the model adds — because a dictionary answer's whole value is knowing which is which.
Ask for these if not provided:
curl -s "https://api.dictionaryapi.dev/api/v2/entries/en/serendipity" → JSON array: phonetic/phonetics[] (IPA + .audio mp3 links), meanings[] grouped by partOfSpeech, each with definitions[] (with example sometimes), synonyms, antonyms, plus origin on some entries.part of speech] — the leading sense, with example] Other senses, compressed · other parts of speech]
Origin: when present in source or asked — labeled if model-supplied] Synonyms: source list] · additional (model-suggested): …]
Source: Free Dictionary API · rerun: [exact curl] On a 404: "not in this dictionary — tried 'lemma]'; the definition below is model knowledge, not a fetched source"]
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 8,743 | 5,405 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,486 | 1,816 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 9,098 | 4,522 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,654 | 1,868 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 7,484 | 8,109 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,202 | 2,299 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,174 | 8,493 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,905 | 2,424 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 5,759 | 5,282 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,066 | 1,778 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 11,883 | 13,046 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,915 | 3,210 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 4,612 | 6,639 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 786 | 2,164 | +175% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 5,640 | 4,666 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 405 | 1,787 | +341% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 6,058 | 6,274 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,163 | 2,083 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 6,942 | 4,391 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,353 | 1,679 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 5,390 | 7,072 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,051 | 2,150 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 7,904 | 1,243 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,205 | 1,112 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 8,582 | 6,551 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,766 | 2,091 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 4,990 | 4,609 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,097 | 1,831 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,443 | 7,504 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,547 | 2,358 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 11,827 | 9,814 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,862 | 2,546 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 6,130 | 5,100 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,269 | 1,988 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 7,475 | 6,105 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,465 | 2,092 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 4,533 | 6,487 | +43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 955 | 2,127 | +123% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 10,407 | 8,416 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,962 | 2,542 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 11,072 | 6,447 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,952 | 2,123 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 11,896 | 1,332 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,066 | 1,182 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.