Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Build a plan to keep a long-distance relationship close and healthy — communication rhythms, visits, shared experiences, and a shared sense of the finish line. Use when asked to help with a long-distance relationship, how to make LDR work, we're going long distance, or keep our relationship strong apart. Produces a communication rhythm that fits both schedules and time zones, ideas for shared experiences across the distance, a visit and cost plan, ways to handle the hard parts (jealousy, lonelin
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-long-distance-relationship-plan/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -45% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 20% | 0% |
Distance doesn't kill relationships — drift, mismatched expectations, and no end in sight do. The couples who thrive apart are intentional: a communication rhythm that isn't exhausting, shared experiences that create "us" moments, a realistic visit plan, and honest agreement on where it's heading. This builds that plan for your situation.
Ask for these if not provided:
Communication rhythm: cadence that fits both + time-zone plan] — quality over constant. Do together: shared activities across distance]. Visits: frequency · cost-share · make-it-count]. Hard parts: jealousy/loneliness/resentment → the habit that helps]. The horizon talk: the end-goal/timeline conversation to have].
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 36,419 | 28,925 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,560 | 4,226 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 34,324 | 27,199 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,906 | 3,951 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 25,485 | 23,569 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,197 | 3,730 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 20,956 | 19,020 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,415 | 3,035 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 19,640 | 13,264 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,209 | 2,902 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 20,644 | 17,276 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,446 | 2,867 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 18,367 | 13,719 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,047 | 2,763 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,374 | 18,303 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,155 | 2,892 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 18,939 | 20,783 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,192 | 3,214 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 20,668 | 8,967 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,489 | 1,379 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 23,470 | 14,110 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,855 | 3,094 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 28,542 | 24,170 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,816 | 3,916 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 26,133 | 20,799 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,086 | 3,262 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 19,117 | 19,379 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,304 | 3,104 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 11,842 | 20,949 | +77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,133 | 3,115 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 20,629 | 18,289 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,562 | 3,075 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,859 | 16,995 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,050 | 2,902 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 22,590 | 19,877 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,265 | 3,011 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 21,181 | 17,816 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,313 | 2,878 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 21,602 | 26,072 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,641 | 3,640 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,923 | 22,283 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,273 | 3,339 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 20,193 | 19,078 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,785 | 3,474 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 19,932 | 16,981 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,246 | 2,753 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.