Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Understand the long-term care options for an older or ill loved one — from in-home care to assisted living to nursing care — so you can compare them for your situation. Use when asked what are the care options for my parent, in-home care vs assisted living vs nursing home, help me choose a care option, or explain long-term care. Produces a plain-English explainer of the main care levels and what each is for, a match to the person's needs (care level, budget, preferences), the key questions and r
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-long-term-care-options/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 29% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 24% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 120% | 0% |
Choosing care for an aging or ill loved one is one of the hardest decisions a family faces — emotionally fraught, expensive, and full of confusing options. This maps the landscape: what the main levels of care actually are and who each suits, how to match them to your person's real needs and budget, what to look for (and the red flags) when evaluating providers, and how to involve the person with dignity. It's a decision map, not medical or financial advice.
Ask for these if not provided:
The options | Level | What it provides | Suits | |---|---|---| | In-home care | help at home, occasional → live-in] | | | Adult day / assisted living | | | | Memory care | | | | Nursing / skilled care | | |
Best matches for your person: given care level + budget + wishes] + the trade-offs. When vetting providers, ask/observe: staffing & turnover · safety & cleanliness · culture/warmth · reviews · inspection records. Cost & funding (research locally): ranges + funding routes to look into]. Involve them: include the person, preserve dignity].
> A decision map — not medical or financial advice. Get a professional needs assessment and financial/legal guidance for the specifics; costs and funding vary by region.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 34,549 | 28,409 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,737 | 4,796 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 29,712 | 26,454 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,976 | 5,147 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 31,810 | 21,704 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,257 | 4,634 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,021 | 16,892 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,545 | 2,929 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 12,641 | 24,186 | +91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,129 | 4,008 | +88% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 16,418 | 19,129 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,719 | 3,371 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 17,624 | 19,662 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,871 | 4,124 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 17,276 | 19,967 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,104 | 3,625 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 17,833 | 28,751 | +61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,766 | 4,921 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 21,932 | 23,816 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,570 | 4,005 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,365 | 19,245 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,853 | 3,263 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 25,009 | 24,060 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,317 | 4,227 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 19,104 | 18,371 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,752 | 3,913 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 21,858 | 22,850 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,843 | 4,266 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 21,884 | 18,052 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,756 | 4,269 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 24,090 | 25,164 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,963 | 4,498 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 22,355 | 25,640 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,603 | 4,419 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 24,728 | 25,877 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,236 | 4,106 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 24,828 | 20,848 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,443 | 4,276 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 29,523 | 20,724 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,546 | 4,325 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 26,953 | 22,108 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,223 | 4,304 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 16,398 | 17,824 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,918 | 4,083 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 24,697 | 27,738 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,452 | 4,259 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +30 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.