Ready to supercharge your AI agents?

Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.

Automotive Crash Avoidance · pangzhenying2025 | DecimalAI

pangzhenying2025/automotive-crash-avoidance

NewSkillScoreMaintained

Expert skill in aeb focusing on crash-avoidance domain applications. Covers 30 topics across crash-avoidance domain. Includes 30 skill files covering ASPICE Level 3, AUTOSAR 4.4, ISO 21434, ISO 26262.

codingby pangzhenying2025

Links this skill to your agents and keeps it current with the author’s updates.

Automatic

Coding pack

1 · One-time — install the CLI (docs ↗)

pip install decimalai

2 · Get the skill — writes .claude/skills/pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance/SKILL.md

decimalai skills pull pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance --out .claude/skills/

No CLI? Get the same file — curl · raw file

curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance/SKILL.md

Raw file: /s/pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance/SKILL.md ↗ · machine-readable summary at /s/pangzhenying2025-automotive-crash-avoidance.json ↗

In productionGlobal

how this skill behaves on real traffic · last 30 days

No production data for this skill yet — usage numbers appear here once agents start running it.

Anonymized aggregate across every org using this skill — proof from real production use, not a demo.

Does this skill help? · Benchmark: with vs. withoutsign in to run this on your agents

22 test cases from the publisher’s eval.yaml · each run twice on gemini-3.6-flash — with the skill injected, then without · last run 51d ago

—+117% tokens0% turns77% of whole cases pass with skill (17/22)

Test case	Without → With	Effect	Δ tokens	Δ turns
case-11	✗→✓	▲ Improved	120%	0%
case-14	✗→✓	▲ Improved	202%	0%
case-12	✓→✗	▼ Worse	112%	0%
case-03	✓→✓	＝ Same ✓	85%	0%
case-04	✓→✓	＝ Same ✓	140%	0%

Showing 5 of 22 cases

SkillSafety

✓ 3 of 3 passed

Code scan15 of 15 checks clean

0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/2/2026

live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing

IntentSafe

LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims

ContentClean

LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review

Source

Imported

pangzhenying2025 / hermes-automotive-skills

skills/automotive-crash-avoidance/SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

License MITImported 8/2/2026Version v1

Skill contents

SKILL.md

Automotive Crash Avoidance

30 skill files covering crash-avoidance domain for automotive software engineering.

Applicable Standards

ASPICE Level 3
AUTOSAR 4.4
ISO 21434
ISO 26262

Use Cases

CRASH-AVOIDANCE system development
Aeb optimization
Production ECU implementation
Multi Collision Brake optimization
Pre Crash optimization

Topics Covered

Aeb

aeb-001
aeb-002
aeb-003
aeb-004
aeb-005
aeb-006
aeb-007
aeb-008
aeb-009
aeb-010

Multi Collision Brake

multi-collision-brake-001
multi-collision-brake-002
multi-collision-brake-003
multi-collision-brake-004
multi-collision-brake-005
multi-collision-brake-006
multi-collision-brake-007
multi-collision-brake-008
multi-collision-brake-009
multi-collision-brake-010

Pre Crash

pre-crash-001
pre-crash-002
pre-crash-003
pre-crash-004
pre-crash-005
pre-crash-006
pre-crash-007
pre-crash-008
pre-crash-009
pre-crash-010

Constraints

AUTOSAR architecture adherence
ISO 26262 functional safety compliance
Real-time performance requirements
Resource constraints (CPU/Memory)

Required Tools

AUTOSAR toolchain
MATLAB/Simulink
Static analyzer (Polyspace/Klocwork)
Vector CANoe/CANalyzer

Instructions

aeb-001

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-002

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-003

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-004

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-005

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-006

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-007

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-008

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-009

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

aeb-010

Core Competencies

Expert in aeb for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-001

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-002

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-003

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-004

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-005

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-006

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-007

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-008

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-009

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

multi-collision-brake-010

Core Competencies

Expert in multi collision brake for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-001

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-002

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-003

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-004

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-005

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-006

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-007

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-008

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-009

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

pre-crash-010

Core Competencies

Expert in pre crash for automotive crash-avoidance systems.

Approach

Analyze requirements against automotive standards
Design solution following AUTOSAR patterns
Implement with safety and security considerations
Validate per ISO 26262 requirements

Deliverables

Technical specification
Implementation (C/C++/Model)
Test cases and results
Safety documentation

Illustrative Want to see what pangzhenying2025/automotive-crash-avoidance would put in front of your model? Preview the rendered body and check its trigger phrases — no LLM call, no signup.

Latest benchmark · publisher runVerified

8/8/2026, 16:32 UTC · 22 cases

Measured on 21 comparable cases — below the 22 needed to publish a lift, so this result is shown here but not on the registry card or leaderboard.

Lift

50% vs 50%

Agent turns

1.0 vs 1.0

Tokens

+117%

8,265.19 vs 3,818.29

fail → pass · 2pass → pass · 15fail → fail · 4pass → fail · 1

Per-case results (22)

Case	Status	Duration (ms)			Turns			Tokens			Tool calls
Case	Status	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ
case-01 We are engineering an Automatic Emergency Braking software component intended for production ECU deployment. Please generate the complete engineering package: a technical design specification, C code implementation, verification test cases, and safety compliance documentation.	fail→fail	24,709	25,045	+1%	1	1	0%	6,182	9,614	+56%	0	0	—
case-02 Our team needs to implement a Multi-Collision Brake module for an embedded automotive target adhering to ASPICE guidelines. Please supply the system technical specification, C/C++ source implementation, validation test suite with expected results, and ISO 26262 safety documentation.	fail→fail	25,824	26,440	+2%	1	1	0%	6,195	9,627	+55%	0	0	—
case-03 We need to implement the Time-to-Collision (TTC) calculation routine for an automatic emergency braking module in C. A naive developer might use simple distance divided by velocity without handling zero or negative relative velocities. Provide the full C implementation for TTC computation that properly handles relative speed edge cases and defines explicit TTC thresholds for warning and braking phases.	pass→pass	20,632	25,643	+24%	1	1	0%	5,169	9,575	+85%	0	0	—
case-04 When designing a Multi-Collision Brake (MCB) control algorithm, engineers often struggle with driver override conditions—specifically whether pressing the accelerator pedal should suppress active secondary braking. Write the driver override suppression logic in C for an MCB software component.	pass→pass	17,834	25,946	+45%	1	1	0%	4,001	9,622	+140%	0	0	—
case-05 For an automotive pre-crash system, we need to implement the electric reversible belt tensioner (RBT) control module. A common oversight is treating pre-crash tensioning as irreversible pyrotechnic firing. Provide the C implementation for reversible belt tensioning triggered by high dynamic instability or critical collision probability.	pass→pass	19,583	25,639	+31%	1	1	0%	4,500	9,634	+114%	0	0	—
case-06 We are integrating an AEB software component into an AUTOSAR 4.4 architecture. Define the AUTOSAR Runnable entities and Port Interfaces (Sender-Receiver and Client-Server) required for receiving target object data from sensor fusion and sending deceleration requests to the Electronic Stability Control (ESC).	pass→pass	15,035	19,381	+29%	1	1	0%	3,496	8,037	+130%	0	0	—
case-07 Perform the ISO 26262 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) for an Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system. What ASIL rating applies to the unintended full braking at highway speed hazard, and what is the corresponding primary safety goal?	pass→pass	12,392	13,152	+6%	1	1	0%	2,523	6,164	+144%	0	0	—
case-08 Under ISO 21434, identify the threat scenarios and TARA risk mitigations for spoofed object data sent over the CAN bus to an Automatic Emergency Braking ECU.	pass→pass	15,235	25,866	+70%	1	1	0%	3,068	8,907	+190%	0	0	—
case-09 When conducting Polyspace Code Prover static analysis on a C source file for a Multi-Collision Brake module, what specific coding flaws or run-time errors should be checked to meet ASPICE SWE.4 compliance?	pass→pass	16,751	18,496	+10%	1	1	0%	3,015	6,856	+127%	0	0	—
case-10 Describe how to set up a Vector CANoe test environment for Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing of an AEB system, including the CAPL test script structure for injecting simulated radar object tracks.	pass→pass	20,232	29,629	+46%	1	1	0%	4,163	9,382	+125%	0	0	—
case-11 To fulfill ASPICE Level 3 process outcome SWE.3 (Software Detailed Design and Unit Construction) for an AEB module, what artifacts and traceability matrices must be produced?	fail→pass	18,957	23,043	+22%	1	1	0%	3,694	8,134	+120%	0	0	—
case-12 Design the pre-crash side window and sunroof closure control module in C. When a side impact or rollover hazard is detected, what timing and pinch-protection considerations must be incorporated into the pre-crash comfort actuator control?	pass→fail	23,930	29,377	+23%	1	1	0%	4,527	9,617	+112%	0	0	—
case-13 Implement an AEB state machine in C. A common flaw is transitioning directly from OFF to FULL_BRAKING without warning states. Model the transitions between STANDBY, INFORM_WARNING, WARN_BRAKING, and EMERGENCY_BRAKING.	pass→pass	18,666	26,083	+40%	1	1	0%	4,033	9,622	+139%	0	0	—
case-14 Specify the target deceleration profile and maximum allowed speed limit threshold for Multi-Collision Brake intervention according to European safety assessment guidelines (such as Euro NCAP).	fail→pass	12,910	16,220	+26%	1	1	0%	2,275	6,873	+202%	0	0	—
case-15 Explain the control sequence and safety preconditions for pre-crash electromechanical seat positioning before an imminent collision.	fail→fail	15,564	28,287	+82%	1	1	0%	2,793	8,903	+219%	0	0	—
case-16 How should an AEB module interface with the AUTOSAR Diagnostic Event Manager (DEM) when radar sensor degradation or blockage is detected?	pass→pass	14,100	16,235	+15%	1	1	0%	2,769	6,639	+140%	0	0	—
case-17 When writing safety-critical C code for an AEB controller subject to MISRA C:2012 standards, how must implicit conversions between float32 and int16 speed inputs be handled?	pass→pass	17,425	12,796	-27%	1	1	0%	3,718	6,124	+65%	0	0	—
case-18 In an AEB system supporting Vulnerable Road User (VRU) protection, how does the system distinguish between a pedestrian crossing the path and a stationary roadside sign to avoid false positive braking?	pass→pass	14,307	18,551	+30%	1	1	0%	2,242	6,571	+193%	0	0	—
case-19 In a Multi-Collision Brake software component, how is the initial crash event validated from the airbag ECU (ACU) bus signals to prevent false secondary braking activation?	pass→pass	14,974	21,120	+41%	1	1	0%	2,590	7,298	+182%	0	0	—
case-20 We are building an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) comfort module for long-distance highway driving. Provide the C function for maintaining driver-selected headway time gap (1.0s to 2.0s) and regulating cruise speed via PID throttle and mild engine braking controls.	pass→pass	24,380	23,568	-3%	1	1	0%	5,695	8,426	+48%	0	0	—
case-21 Our team is developing a center-console infotainment application in C++ that renders turn-by-turn navigation graphics and calculates optimal GPS routes. Provide the route optimization graph traversal algorithm function.	pass→pass	14,747	19,902	+35%	1	1	0%	3,536	7,944	+125%	0	0	—
case-22 We are designing the low-level hardware driver for firing pyrotechnic squibs inside an Airbag Control Unit (ACU) during primary impact. Write the high-current FET switch activation sequence in C for squib loop resistance diagnostics and firing energy capacitor discharge.	fail→fail	66,656	74,495	+12%	1	1	0%	787	4,367	+455%	0	0	—

These cases were also screened by the skill’s intent / safety pass.See the Trust review ↗Reproduce this benchmark in Colab ↗

How this skill was measured

DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.

Model measured: gemini-3.6-flash
Graded by: gemini-3.6-flash
Grading method: judged
Verification: verified
Pass rate without the skill: 50%
Pass rate with the skill: 50%
Cases attempted: 22
Cases counted toward lift: 21
Cases that regressed: 2
Skill version measured: v1
Run completed: 8/8/2026, 16:32 UTC

Measured example — same prompt, with vs. without the skill · from the benchmark run · case case-11

Prompt

To fulfill ASPICE Level 3 process outcome SWE.3 (Software Detailed Design and Unit Construction) for an AEB module, what artifacts and traceability matrices must be produced?

Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.

Show both answers

SkillScore blends 4 signalsno signals yet

BenchmarkRun a verified benchmark with positive lift

Live evalNeeds ≥10 evaluated traces in 30 days

AI ratingNeeds ≥10 rated traces

AdoptionNeeds ≥10 serves across ≥2 orgs in 30 days

Efficiency · separate axis (at equal correctness)+0% turns+122% tokens

Shown for transparency; not credited unless a verified run shows no correctness regression.

No signals yet — run a benchmark or collect evaluated traces to earn a score.

Verified on gemini-3.6-flash · re-tested 50 days ago

Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.