Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Conduct a sector-specific threat landscape assessment by analyzing threat actor targeting patterns, common attack vectors, and industry-specific vulnerabilities to inform organizational risk management.
.claude/skills/performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
A sector-specific threat landscape assessment analyzes the cyber threat environment facing a particular industry vertical (healthcare, financial services, energy, government, manufacturing) by examining which threat actors target the sector, their preferred attack vectors and TTPs, common vulnerabilities exploited, historical incident data, and emerging threats. This produces actionable intelligence for risk management, security investment prioritization, and board-level reporting.
attackcti, requests, pandas, matplotlib librariesDifferent sectors face different threat profiles. Financial services face sophisticated nation-state actors (Lazarus Group) and cybercriminal groups focused on financial fraud. Healthcare faces ransomware groups exploiting urgency and legacy systems. Energy and critical infrastructure face nation-state groups (TEMP.Veles, Sandworm) with destructive capabilities. Government faces espionage-focused APTs (APT29, APT28, Turla).
A comprehensive assessment includes: threat actor profiling (groups targeting the sector), attack vector analysis (initial access methods observed), TTP mapping (techniques commonly used against sector), vulnerability landscape (CVEs commonly exploited), incident trend analysis (breach frequency, impact, recovery time), and emerging threats (new groups, evolving techniques, supply chain risks).
Sector-specific intelligence comes from ISACs (Information Sharing and Analysis Centers), government advisories (CISA, FBI, NSA), vendor threat reports (CrowdStrike Annual Threat Report, Mandiant M-Trends, Verizon DBIR), and academic research on sector-specific attacks.
pythonfrom attackcti import attack_client import json class SectorThreatAssessment: SECTOR_GROUPS = { "financial": ["FIN7", "FIN8", "FIN11", "Carbanak", "Lazarus Group", "Cobalt Group", "TA505", "GOLD SOUTHFIELD"], "healthcare": ["FIN12", "Ryuk", "Conti", "Wizard Spider", "GOLD ULRICK", "Vice Society"], "energy": ["TEMP.Veles", "Sandworm Team", "Dragonfly", "XENOTIME", "ERYTHRITE", "Berserk Bear"], "government": ["APT29", "APT28", "Turla", "Gamaredon Group", "Mustang Panda", "APT41", "Lazarus Group"], "manufacturing": ["APT41", "TEMP.Veles", "Dragonfly", "HEXANE", "MAGNALLIUM"], "technology": ["APT41", "Lazarus Group", "APT10", "HAFNIUM", "Winnti Group"], } def __init__(self, sector): self.sector = sector.lower() self.lift = attack_client() self.groups = self.lift.get_groups() self.assessment = { "sector": sector, "threat_actors": [], "common_techniques": {}, "attack_vectors": {}, "risk_summary": {}, } def analyze_sector_actors(self): """Analyze threat actors known to target this sector.""" target_groups = self.SECTOR_GROUPS.get(self.sector, []) actor_profiles = [] for group_name in target_groups: group = next( (g for g in self.groups if g.get("name", "").lower() == group_name.lower() or group_name.lower() in [a.lower() for a in g.get("aliases", [])]), None ) if group: group_id = "" for ref in group.get("external_references", []): if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack": group_id = ref.get("external_id", "") break techniques = [] if group_id: techs = self.lift.get_techniques_used_by_group(group_id) for t in techs: for ref in t.get("external_references", []): if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack": techniques.append({ "id": ref.get("external_id", ""), "name": t.get("name", ""), }) break profile = { "name": group.get("name", ""), "aliases": group.get("aliases", []), "description": group.get("description", "")[:300], "attack_id": group_id, "technique_count": len(techniques), "techniques": techniques[:20], } actor_profiles.append(profile) print(f" [+] {group.get('name')}: {len(techniques)} techniques") self.assessment["threat_actors"] = actor_profiles print(f"[+] Profiled {len(actor_profiles)} threat actors for {self.sector}") return actor_profiles def identify_common_techniques(self): """Find the most commonly used techniques across sector actors.""" from collections import Counter technique_counter = Counter() for actor in self.assessment["threat_actors"]: for tech in actor.get("techniques", []): technique_counter[f"{tech['id']}:{tech['name']}"] += 1 common = technique_counter.most_common(20) self.assessment["common_techniques"] = [ { "technique": tech.split(":")[0], "name": tech.split(":")[1] if ":" in tech else "", "actor_count": count, "actors_using": [ a["name"] for a in self.assessment["threat_actors"] if any(t["id"] == tech.split(":")[0] for t in a.get("techniques", [])) ], } for tech, count in common ] print(f"\n=== Top Techniques for {self.sector.upper()} ===") for entry in self.assessment["common_techniques"][:10]: print(f" {entry['technique']} {entry['name']}: " f"used by {entry['actor_count']} groups") return self.assessment["common_techniques"] assessment = SectorThreatAssessment("financial") assessment.analyze_sector_actors() assessment.identify_common_techniques()
pythondef analyze_attack_vectors(assessment): """Analyze initial access vectors common for the sector.""" initial_access_techniques = [ t for t in assessment.assessment["common_techniques"] if t["technique"].startswith("T1566") or t["technique"].startswith("T1190") or t["technique"].startswith("T1133") or t["technique"].startswith("T1078") or t["technique"].startswith("T1195") ] # Supplement with known sector-specific vectors sector_vectors = { "financial": { "primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)", "Valid Accounts (T1078)", "Supply Chain Compromise (T1195)"], "emerging": ["MFA Fatigue/Push Bombing", "QR Code Phishing (Quishing)", "Business Email Compromise", "API Key Theft"], }, "healthcare": { "primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)", "External Remote Services (T1133)", "Valid Accounts (T1078)"], "emerging": ["IoMT Device Exploitation", "Telehealth Platform Attacks", "Medical Device Firmware Attacks", "Supply Chain via EHR Vendors"], }, "energy": { "primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)", "External Remote Services (T1133)", "Supply Chain Compromise (T1195)"], "emerging": ["OT/ICS Protocol Exploitation", "Remote Access to SCADA", "Engineering Workstation Compromise", "Vendor VPN Exploitation"], }, } vectors = sector_vectors.get(assessment.sector, {}) assessment.assessment["attack_vectors"] = vectors return vectors
pythondef generate_sector_report(assessment): data = assessment.assessment report = f"""# {data['sector'].title()} Sector Threat Landscape Assessment Generated: {datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()} ## Executive Summary This assessment analyzes the cyber threat landscape for the {data['sector']} sector, identifying {len(data['threat_actors'])} active threat groups, their preferred techniques, and recommended defensive priorities. ## Threat Actor Summary | Actor | ATT&CK ID | Techniques | Key Focus | |-------|-----------|------------|-----------| """ for actor in data["threat_actors"]: report += (f"| {actor['name']} | {actor['attack_id']} " f"| {actor['technique_count']} | {actor['description'][:60]}... |\n") report += f""" ## Most Common Techniques | Rank | Technique | Name | Groups Using | |------|-----------|------|-------------| """ for i, tech in enumerate(data.get("common_techniques", [])[:15], 1): actors = ", ".join(tech["actors_using"][:3]) report += f"| {i} | {tech['technique']} | {tech['name']} | {actors} |\n" vectors = data.get("attack_vectors", {}) report += f""" ## Attack Vectors ### Primary Vectors """ for v in vectors.get("primary", []): report += f"- {v}\n" report += "\n### Emerging Vectors\n" for v in vectors.get("emerging", []): report += f"- {v}\n" report += """ ## Recommendations 1. Prioritize detections for the top 10 techniques used by sector-targeting groups 2. Conduct threat-informed red team exercises mimicking identified actors 3. Join sector ISAC for real-time threat sharing 4. Implement controls for identified initial access vectors 5. Review supply chain security posture for sector-specific risks """ with open(f"threat_landscape_{data['sector']}.md", "w") as f: f.write(report) print(f"[+] Sector report saved: threat_landscape_{data['sector']}.md") generate_sector_report(assessment)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +52 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.