Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'
.claude/skills/phuryn-competitive-battlecard/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -3% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 22% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard for use against a specific competitor.
You are creating a competitive battlecard for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research the competitor's current product, pricing, positioning, and recent changes. If the user provides files (feature lists, win/loss data, sales call notes), read them first.
### Company Overview
### Quick Comparison
| Capability | Us | Them | Winner | |---|---|---|---| | Feature area 1] | Our approach] | Their approach] | Us/Them/Tie] | | Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... | | Pricing | ... | ... | ... | | Support | ... | ... | ... |
### Where We Win
### Where They Win
### Common Objections & Responses
| Prospect Says | Respond With | |---|---| | "Competitor X has feature]" | "Our alternative approach and why it's better for them]" | | "They're cheaper" | "Value framing: total cost of ownership, ROI, hidden costs]" | | "They're more established" | "Our advantages: speed, innovation, focus, support]" |
### Landmines to Plant Questions to ask the prospect that highlight competitor weaknesses:
### Win/Loss Patterns
Save as markdown. Format for easy printing or sharing in Notion/Confluence.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-09 | fail→pass | 28,428 | 20,106 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,089 | 2,982 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 23,634 | 9,508 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,948 | 1,163 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,873 | 47,495 | +875% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 296 | 1,267 | +328% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 22,235 | 16,798 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,531 | 3,492 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 12,794 | 16,979 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,144 | 3,133 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 22,897 | 38,540 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,530 | 3,060 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 22,375 | 16,267 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,644 | 3,231 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 25,731 | 24,110 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,865 | 3,570 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 14,911 | 20,303 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,902 | 3,327 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 16,236 | 35,677 | +120% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,523 | 3,253 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 18,018 | 14,254 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,906 | 2,968 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 17,643 | 14,803 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,801 | 3,043 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 18,195 | 17,749 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,766 | 3,525 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 16,803 | 14,818 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,631 | 2,862 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 18,666 | 23,662 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,671 | 3,684 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 17,901 | 8,271 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,801 | 1,195 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 17,821 | 19,792 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 3,514 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 19,720 | 15,995 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,095 | 3,280 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 27,467 | 22,017 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,030 | 3,634 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 18,331 | 21,516 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,952 | 3,664 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,175 | 25,741 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,875 | 4,855 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,145 | 19,184 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,705 | 3,905 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.