Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews, ads, social presence, and pricing — then produce a structured sales battlecard with positioning traps, objection handlers, landmine questions, and win/loss themes. Chains web research, review mining, and ad intelligence. Use when sales needs competitive ammo or when entering a new market with established incumbents.
.claude/skills/gooseworks-ai-battlecard-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 51% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 39% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 97% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 111% | 0% |
Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.
Built for: PMMs building competitive programs without a dedicated competitive intel team. The battlecard should be opinionated, not a neutral feature comparison.
Fetch: [competitor] homepage, pricing page, about page, product page
Search: "[competitor]" "we help" OR "the only" OR "unlike"
Search: "[competitor]" case study OR customer storyExtract:
Search: "[competitor]" site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com
Search: "[competitor]" reviews "switched from" OR "moved to"From reviews, extract:
Search: "[competitor]" advertisement OR sponsored
Search: "[competitor]" vs OR alternative OR compareExtract:
Search: "[competitor]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com complaints OR issues
Search: "[competitor]" "looking for alternative" OR "anyone use"Extract:
Fetch: [competitor] pricing page
Search: "[competitor]" pricing OR cost OR "how much"Map their pricing:
| Dimension | Them | Us | Net | |-----------|------|-----|-----| | Feature area 1] | Rating + context] | Rating + context] | Win/Lose/Tie | | Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... | | Pricing | ... | ... | ... | | Ease of use | ... | ... | ... | | Support | ... | ... | ... | | Integrations | ... | ... | ... |
markdown# Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor] Last updated: [DATE] | Confidence: [High/Medium — based on data freshness] --- ## Quick Reference (The 30-Second Version) **They say:** "[Their positioning headline]" **We say:** "[Our counter-positioning]" **We win when:** [Deal profile where we have advantage] **We lose when:** [Deal profile where they have advantage] **Best opening move:** "[Question or statement to frame the deal]" --- ## Competitor Overview | | [Competitor] | |---|---| | **Founded** | [Year] | | **Funding** | [Amount / stage] | | **Headcount** | [Estimate] | | **Target market** | [Who they serve] | | **Pricing** | [Model + range] | | **Category** | [How they position] | --- ## Positioning Traps Questions to ask early in the deal that frame the evaluation in your favor: 1. **"[Question that highlights your strength]"** → If they say [X], you win because [reason] → If they say [Y], pivot to [angle] 2. **"[Question that exposes competitor weakness]"** → Their answer will likely be [X], which reveals [limitation] 3. **"[Question about a capability they lack]"** → They can't do this. When the prospect asks them, it plants doubt. --- ## Landmine Questions Drop these casually — they'll come up when the prospect evaluates the competitor: - "Have you asked [competitor] about [specific limitation]?" - "When you evaluate [competitor], make sure to test [area where they're weak]." - "One thing worth checking: [competitor] pricing can get expensive once you [usage trigger]." --- ## Objection Handling ### "Why shouldn't we just go with [Competitor]?" > "[Direct response — acknowledge their strength, pivot to your differentiation]" ### "[Competitor] has more features / is more established" > "[Response — focus on what matters for this buyer's use case, not feature count]" ### "[Competitor] is cheaper" > "[Response — reframe on total cost, hidden costs, or value per dollar]" ### "[Competitor] has [big customer logo]" > "[Response — your relevant social proof + why logo != fit]" ### "We're already using [Competitor]" > "[Response — switching cost vs cost of staying, what's changed]" --- ## Feature Comparison (Honest Assessment) | Capability | Us | [Competitor] | Verdict | |-----------|-----|-------------|---------| | [Feature 1] | [Status + context] | [Status + context] | [Who wins + why] | | [Feature 2] | ... | ... | ... | | [Feature 3] | ... | ... | ... | | Pricing transparency | ... | ... | ... | | Onboarding speed | ... | ... | ... | | Support quality | ... | ... | ... | --- ## Their Customers Say (From Reviews) ### What they love (don't fight these): - "[Quote from review]" — [Platform, Role] - "[Quote]" — ... ### What they hate (exploit these): - "[Quote from negative review]" — [Platform, Role] - "[Quote]" — ... - "[Quote]" — ... --- ## Pricing Comparison | | Us | [Competitor] | |---|---|---| | **Entry price** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] | | **Mid-tier** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] | | **Enterprise** | [Custom / $X] | [Custom / $X] | | **Free tier** | [What's included] | [What's included] | | **Hidden costs** | [None / list] | [Implementation, overages, etc.] | **Pricing attack angle:** [How to frame pricing comparison favorably] --- ## Win Themes (What Wins Deals) Based on competitive patterns: 1. **[Theme]** — "[Proof point or quote]" 2. **[Theme]** — ... 3. **[Theme]** — ... ## Loss Themes (What Loses Deals) Be aware — we tend to lose when: 1. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy] 2. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy] --- ## Quick Responses for Email/Chat **When prospect mentions [competitor]:** > "[2-sentence response for email or Slack]" **When asked for a comparison:** > "[3-sentence elevator pitch vs competitor]"
Save to clients/<client-name>/product-marketing/battlecards/vs-[competitor-slug]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
| Component | Cost | |-----------|------| | Web research | Free | | Review mining (optional, via review-site-scraper) | ~$0.50-1.00 | | Ad analysis (optional, via ad scrapers) | ~$0.50-1.00 | | All analysis and battlecard generation | Free (LLM reasoning) | | Total | Free — $2 |
review-site-scraper for G2/Capterra mininggoogle-ad-scraper for ad intelligence, web_search against Meta Ad Library for Meta adsOther measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.