Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sangrokjung/humanize-korean
Clean up translation-ese and AI-writing tics in Korean prose so it reads like a person wrote it — content (facts, numbers, proper nouns, quotes) stays 100% unchanged, only style and rhythm are touched. Single-pass, done in this session. Triggers — AI 티 없애줘, 번역투 고쳐줘, 한글 자연스럽게 윤문해줘, sounds like a machine translation, remove AI tells from this Korean text, make this Korean read naturally. Not for: marketing copy generation (write it clean the first time — see rules/korean-writing-quality.md), Engli
Passed 16 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 23 without it.
and 3 more in the full report
5 fixed11 passed either way7 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
You are cleaning up a draft of an opinion column (시사 칼럼) on urban planning in Korean that contains awkward translation-ese expressions like '~하는 것에 틀림없다'. A reviewer suggests converting the column into an objective academic research abstract.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| maintains the original opinion column genre | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Analogy. A proofreading desk for text that reads like it just came out of a translator — the goal is to make it read like it was written in Korean from the start. It changes not a single fact (proper nouns, numbers, quotes stay 100% intact) — only the style and rhythm. This is removing translation-ese and AI idioms to improve Korean prose quality, not "evading an AI detector."
비유: 번역기를 갓 거친 듯 어색한 한글을 "원래 한국어로 쓴 글"처럼 다듬는 교정 데스크. 사실은 한 글자도 안 바꾸고(고유명사·수치·인용 100% 보존) 문체·리듬·표현만 손본다. 이것은 번역투·AI 구문 제거 = 한글 품질 개선이지 "AI 탐지기 우회"가 아니다.
rules/korean-writing-quality.md instead; this skill is for cleaning up existing text. If the input is a full book manuscript, treat this as a starting point only — long-form editorial judgment belongs to a human editor or a project-specific process.rules/korean-writing-quality.md §5). If this session or your tooling routes the actual rewrite through a model surface outside this session (a different vendor's API, a hosted service), don't send text containing client names, deal amounts, PII, salary data, or secrets through that surface unless you've explicitly cleared it for that data. When in doubt, do the cleanup pass locally in this session, or redact first.references/quick-rules.md (compact ID + prescription table) and, for anything ambiguous or worth a worked example, reference/ai-tell-taxonomy.md (the full pattern reference this pack ships at the repo root).references/quick-rules.md before returning the result. If change rate exceeds 50%, stop and tell the user instead of shipping the rewrite — that's not a cleanup pass anymore.references/quick-rules.md), and (b) 3-6 of the most significant before → after examples so the user can see what actually changed.references/quick-rules.md or reference/ai-tell-taxonomy.md. Don't edit prose just because you'd have phrased it differently.Never describe this skill's purpose as "evading an AI detector," "detector bypass," or "hiding that this was AI-written." The actual purpose is improving awkward, translation-ese Korean into natural Korean — a legitimate prose-quality goal, independent of who or what wrote the draft.
For long-form (8,000+ characters), high-stakes, or precision-critical text, a heavier multi-pass review (separate detection, rewrite, and independent fidelity/naturalness review stages) does a more thorough job than this single-pass skill. That's a project-specific setup this skill doesn't ship — if you need it, build a multi-stage review around reference/ai-tell-taxonomy.md as the shared pattern reference.
rules/korean-writing-quality.mdreference/ai-tell-taxonomy.mdreferences/quick-rules.mdskills/korean-character-count (deterministic character/byte counting), skills/korean-spell-check (rule-based spell/grammar check via a public checker)test cases passed, vs 11 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.