Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guide Claude through SCSA, MetaTiME, CellVote, CellMatch, GPTAnno, and weighted KNN transfer workflows for annotating single-cell modalities.
.claude/skills/single-cell-annotation-skills-with-omicverse/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill to reproduce and adapt the single-cell annotation playbook captured in omicverse tutorials: SCSA t_cellanno.ipynb, MetaTiME t_metatime.ipynb, CellVote t_cellvote.md & t_cellvote_pbmc3k.ipynb, CellMatch t_cellmatch.ipynb, GPTAnno t_gptanno.ipynb, and label transfer t_anno_trans.ipynb. Each section below highlights required inputs, training/inference steps, and how to read the outputs.
pbmc3k_filtered_gene_bc_matrices.tar.gz) or the processed sample/rna.h5ad. Download instructions are embedded in the notebook; unpack to data/filtered_gene_bc_matrices/hg19/. Ensure an SCSA SQLite database is available (e.g. pySCSA_2024_v1_plus.db from the Figshare/Drive links listed in the tutorial) and point model_path to its location.sc.read_10x_mtx, run QC (ov.pp.qc), normalization and HVG selection (ov.pp.preprocess), scaling (ov.pp.scale), PCA (ov.pp.pca), neighbors, Leiden clustering, and compute rank markers (sc.tl.rank_genes_groups). Instantiate scsa = ov.single.pySCSA(...) choosing target='cellmarker' or 'panglaodb', tissue scope, and thresholds (foldchange, pvalue).scsa.cell_anno(clustertype='leiden', result_key='scsa_celltype_cellmarker') or scsa.cell_auto_anno to append predictions to adata.obs. Compare to manual marker-based labels via ov.utils.embedding or sc.pl.dotplot, inspect marker dictionaries (ov.single.get_celltype_marker), and query supported tissues with scsa.get_model_tissue(). Use the ROI/ROE helpers (ov.utils.roe, ov.utils.plot_cellproportion) to validate abundance trends.TiME_adata_scvi.h5ad from Figshare (https://figshare.com/ndownloader/files/41440050). If starting from counts, run scVI (scvi.model.SCVI) first to populate adata.obsm['X_scVI'].adata.obs['isTME']. Rebuild neighbors on the latent representation (sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep="X_scVI")) and embed with pymde (adata.obsm['X_mde'] = ov.utils.mde(...)). Initialise TiME_object = ov.single.MetaTiME(adata, mode='table') and, if finer granularity is desired, over-cluster with TiME_object.overcluster(resolution=8, clustercol='overcluster').TiME_object.predictTiME(save_obs_name='MetaTiME') to assign minor states and Major_MetaTiME. Visualise using TiME_object.plot or sc.pl.embedding. Interpret the outputs by comparing cluster-level distributions and confirming that MetaTiME and Major_MetaTiME columns align with expected niches.CELLVOTE_PBMC3K env var or data/pbmc3k.h5ad) plus at least two precomputed annotation columns (simulated in the tutorial as scsa_annotation, gpt_celltype, gbi_celltype). Prepare per-cluster marker genes via sc.tl.rank_genes_groups.marker_dict = top_markers_from_rgg(adata, 'leiden', topn=10) or via ov.single.get_celltype_marker. Instantiate cv = ov.single.CellVote(adata).cv.vote(clusters_key='leiden', cluster_markers=marker_dict, celltype_keys=[...], species='human', organization='PBMC', provider='openai', model='gpt-4o-mini'). Offline examples monkey-patch arbitration to avoid API calls; online voting requires valid credentials. Final consensus labels live in adata.obs['CellVote_celltype']. Compare each cluster’s majority vote with the input sources (adata.obs[['leiden', 'scsa_annotation', ...]]) to justify decisions.pertpy.dt.haber_2017_regions() with adata.obs['cell_label']. Download Cell Ontology JSON (cl.json) via ov.single.download_cl(...) or manual links, and optionally Cell Taxonomy resources (Cell_Taxonomy_resource.txt). Ensure access to a SentenceTransformer model (sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2, BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, etc.), downloading to local_model_dir if offline.ov.single.CellOntologyMapper(cl_obo_file='new_ontology/cl.json', model_name='sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2', local_model_dir='./my_models'). Run mapper.map_adata(...) to assign ontology-derived labels/IDs, optionally enabling taxonomy matching (use_taxonomy=True after calling load_cell_taxonomy_resource).mapper.print_mapping_summary_taxonomy) and inspect embeddings coloured by cell_ontology, cell_ontology_cl_id, or enhanced_cell_ontology. Use helper queries such as mapper.find_similar_cells('T helper cell'), mapper.get_cell_info(...), and category browsing to validate ontology coverage..h5ad) and cluster assignments. Access to an LLM endpoint—configure AGI_API_KEY for OpenAI-compatible providers (provider='openai', 'qwen', 'kimi', etc.), or supply a local model path for ov.single.gptcelltype_local.ov.single.get_celltype_marker(adata, clustertype='leiden', rank=True, key='rank_genes_groups', foldchange=2, topgenenumber=5).ov.single.gptcelltype(...) specifying tissue/species context and desired provider/model. Post-process responses to keep clean labels (result[key].split(': ')[-1]...) and write them to adata.obs['gpt_celltype']. Compare embeddings (ov.pl.embedding(..., color=['leiden','gpt_celltype'])) to verify cluster identities. If operating offline, call ov.single.gptcelltype_local with a downloaded instruction-tuned checkpoint.data/analysis_lymph/rna-emb.h5ad (annotated RNA) and data/analysis_lymph/atac-emb.h5ad (query ATAC) where both contain obsm['X_glue'].ov.utils.mde. Train a neighbour model using ov.utils.weighted_knn_trainer(train_adata=rna, train_adata_emb='X_glue', n_neighbors=15).labels, uncert = ov.utils.weighted_knn_transfer(query_adata=atac, query_adata_emb='X_glue', label_keys='major_celltype', knn_model=knn_transformer, ref_adata_obs=rna.obs). Store predictions in atac.obs['transf_celltype'] and uncertainties in atac.obs['transf_celltype_unc']; copy to major_celltype if you want consistent naming. Visualise (ov.utils.embedding) and inspect uncertainty to flag ambiguous cells.clustertype, NOT clusterCORRECT usage:
python# Step 1: Initialize pySCSA scsa = ov.single.pySCSA( adata, foldchange=1.5, pvalue=0.01, species='Human', tissue='All', target='cellmarker' # or 'panglaodb' ) # Step 2: Run annotation - NOTE: use clustertype='leiden', NOT cluster='leiden'! anno_result = scsa.cell_anno(clustertype='leiden', cluster='all') # Step 3: Add cell type labels to adata.obs scsa.cell_auto_anno(adata, clustertype='leiden', key='scsa_celltype') # Results are stored in adata.obs['scsa_celltype']
WRONG - DO NOT USE:
python# WRONG! 'cluster' is NOT a valid parameter for cell_auto_anno! # scsa.cell_auto_anno(adata, cluster='leiden') # ERROR!
CORRECT usage:
python# Step 1: Run COSG marker gene identification ov.single.cosg(adata, groupby='leiden', n_genes_user=50) # Step 2: Access results from adata.uns (NOT adata.obs!) marker_names = adata.uns['rank_genes_groups']['names'] # DataFrame with cluster columns marker_scores = adata.uns['rank_genes_groups']['scores'] # Step 3: Get top markers for specific cluster cluster_0_markers = adata.uns['rank_genes_groups']['names']['0'][:10].tolist() # Step 4: To create celltype column, manually map clusters to cell types cluster_to_celltype = { '0': 'T cells', '1': 'B cells', '2': 'Monocytes', } adata.obs['cosg_celltype'] = adata.obs['leiden'].map(cluster_to_celltype)
WRONG - DO NOT USE:
python# WRONG! COSG does NOT create adata.obs columns directly! # adata.obs['cosg_celltype'] # This key does NOT exist after running COSG! # adata.uns['cosg_celltype'] # This key also does NOT exist!
clustertype = which obs column contains cluster labels (e.g., 'leiden')cluster = which specific clusters to annotate ('all' or specific cluster IDs)adata.uns['rank_genes_groups']adata.obs['<key>']adata.uns['<key>'] (includes 'names', 'scores', 'logfoldchanges')adata.uns['rank_genes_groups']haber_2017_regions clusters to ontology terms, and enrich ambiguous clusters using Cell Taxonomy hints."major_celltype labels onto GLUE-integrated ATAC cells and report clusters with high transfer uncertainty."t_cellanno.ipynb, t_metatime.ipynb, t_cellvote.md, t_cellvote_pbmc3k.ipynb, t_cellmatch.ipynb, t_gptanno.ipynb, t_anno_trans.ipynb.TiME_adata_scvi.h5ad (Figshare), SCSA database downloads, GLUE embeddings under data/analysis_lymph/, Cell Ontology cl.json, and Cell Taxonomy resource.reference.md.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +86 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.