Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guide to reproducing OmicVerse trajectory workflows spanning PAGA, Palantir, VIA, velocity coupling, and fate scoring notebooks.
.claude/skills/single-trajectory-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
This skill describes how to reproduce and extend the single-trajectory analysis workflow in omicverse, combining graph-based trajectory inference, RNA velocity coupling, and downstream fate scoring notebooks.
pp.neighbors) on the preprocessed AnnData object.tl.paga to compute cluster connectivity and tl.draw_graph or tl.umap with init_pos='paga' for embedding.Palantir on diffusion components, seeding with manually selected start cells (e.g., naïve T cells).via.VIA on the kNN graph to identify lineage progression with automatic root selection or user-defined roots.scv.pp.filter_and_normalize, scv.pp.moments, and scv.tl.velocity to generate velocity layers.adata.layers['velocity'] to refine lineage directionality (via.VIA(..., velocity_weight=...)).scv.tl.latent_time) to validate directionality and root selection.t_cellfate*.ipynb: Map lineage probabilities onto T-cell subsets, quantify fate bias, and visualize heatmaps.t_metacells.ipynb: Aggregate metacell trajectories for robustness checks and meta-state differential expression.t_cytotrace.ipynb: Integrate CytoTRACE differentiation potential with velocity-informed lineages for maturation scoring.sc.pp.normalize_total, sc.pp.log1p).sc.pp.highly_variable_genes).scvi-tools, bbknn).n_neighbors and n_pcs should be harmonized across PAGA, VIA, and Palantir to maintain consistency.knn, too_big_factor, and root_user for datasets with uneven sampling.threshold to control edge sparsity; ensure connected components reflect biological branches.mode='stochastic' vs mode='dynamical' in scVelo; recalibrate if terminal states disagree with VIA.scv.pl.paga) and annotate branch labels.via.plot_fates and via.plot_scatter.scv.pp.moments and scv.tl.velocity ensuring adata.layers['spliced']/['unspliced'] exist; verify loom/H5AD import preserved layers.n_neighbors; confirm batch correction didn’t fragment the manifold.cluster_graph_pruning_iter), or provide manual terminal state hints based on marker expression.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.