Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →This skill enables Perplexity AI to rapidly synthesize large volumes of information from multiple sources into concise, structured, and actionable summaries tailored to specific audiences and purposes.
.claude/skills/vythanhtra-skill-research-summarization/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 98% | 46 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 80% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 77% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 53% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 11% | 0% |
This skill enables Perplexity AI to rapidly synthesize large volumes of information from multiple sources into concise, structured, and actionable summaries tailored to specific audiences and purposes.
yamlrequired_inputs: - research_topic: "The subject to research and summarize" - audience: "Who will read this summary" - purpose: "Why this summary is needed" optional_inputs: - scope: "Breadth and depth of coverage" - time_range: "How recent the sources should be" - length: "brief|standard|comprehensive" - format: "bullets|narrative|structured|executive" - focus_areas: "Specific aspects to emphasize" - output_language: "Language for the summary"
Step 1: Research Brief Creation
Step 2: Source Planning
Step 3: Systematic Search
Search query templates:
Step 4: Source Evaluation
| Criteria | High Quality | Medium Quality | Low Quality | |----------|-------------|----------------|-------------| | Authority | Peer-reviewed, official | Industry reports | Anonymous blogs | | Recency | Last 6 months | Last 2 years | Older than 3 years | | Accuracy | Verified, cited | Generally accurate | Unverified claims | | Bias | Neutral/disclosed | Minor bias | Strong agenda |
Step 5: Theme Identification
Step 6: Hierarchical Organization
Step 7: Writing for Audience
# [Topic] Executive Summary
Prepared: [Date] | For: [Audience] | By: [Author]
## Bottom Line Up Front
[2-3 sentences on what you need to know and why it matters]
## Key Findings
1. [Finding 1]: [One sentence with supporting data]
2. [Finding 2]: [One sentence with supporting data]
3. [Finding 3]: [One sentence with supporting data]
## Implications
- Short-term: [Immediate actions or impacts]
- Long-term: [Strategic considerations]
## Recommended Actions
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
## Sources
[List of key sources used]# Research Summary: [Topic]
Scope: [Geographic/Temporal scope]
Date Range: [Coverage period]
Sources Reviewed: [Number and types]
## Executive Overview
[150-200 word summary]
## Background and Context
[Why this topic matters, historical context]
## Key Themes and Findings
### Theme 1: [Title]
Summary: [2-3 sentence overview]
Evidence:
- [Data point or finding]
- [Supporting example]
- [Expert quote or opinion]
Confidence Level: High/Medium/Low
## Data and Statistics
| Metric | Value | Source | Date |
|--------|-------|--------|------|
## Contrasting Perspectives
Mainstream View: [Summary]
Alternative View: [Summary]
Why it matters: [Implication of the disagreement]
## Gaps and Limitations
- [Information not found or unavailable]
- [Areas needing further research]
## Implications and Recommendations
- [Recommendation 1]
- [Recommendation 2]
## Source Bibliography
| Source | Type | Credibility | Date |
|--------|------|------------|------|yamlrecurring_summaries: daily: - Industry news digest - Competitor monitoring brief weekly: - Market intelligence summary - Regulatory update briefing - Research paper highlights monthly: - Industry landscape report - Technology trend analysis on_demand: - Due diligence research - Topic deep-dives - Crisis information gathering
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | pass→pass | 13,329 | 12,683 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,272 | 4,031 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 34,973 | 25,118 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,199 | 6,726 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 13,236 | 13,575 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,230 | 4,016 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,182 | 13,465 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,734 | 4,173 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 20,615 | 21,078 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,381 | 5,494 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 26,715 | 18,638 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,252 | 4,707 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 14,968 | 17,169 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,513 | 4,769 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 13,338 | 13,837 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,100 | 4,017 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 17,826 | 21,104 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,177 | 5,711 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 15,965 | 12,022 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,423 | 3,594 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 9,755 | 15,447 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,184 | 4,910 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 18,266 | 25,690 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,255 | 4,783 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 6,292 | 14,808 | +135% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 991 | 4,152 | +319% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 19,092 | 24,229 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,221 | 5,910 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 23,881 | 20,527 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,812 | 5,001 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 13,112 | 14,524 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,170 | 4,136 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 25,082 | 23,172 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,218 | 5,514 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 13,169 | 12,412 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,033 | 3,775 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 16,528 | 20,729 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,807 | 5,099 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 25,388 | 45,696 | +80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,099 | 4,600 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 11,341 | 11,507 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,486 | 4,470 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 14,145 | 21,011 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,511 | 4,657 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/3/2026 | +18% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.