Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →wasabeef/多角色辩论探讨权衡方案
多角色辩论探讨权衡方案。「角色间讨论」「探讨权衡」「从不同角度讨论」等触发。
Passed 19 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 21 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
11 fixed9 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Perform a quality check on a technical debate transcript regarding GraphQL vs REST using the debate quality checklist guidelines.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The review explicitly evaluates argument quality against official documentation or standards. | Missed | Passed |
| The review assesses practical implementability including technical feasibility and costs. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
不同专业角色进行辩论,考虑权衡取舍并导出最优解的命令。
/role-debate <角色 1>,<角色 2> [议题]
/role-debate <角色 1>,<角色 2>,<角色 3> [议题]
# 安全性 vs 性能的权衡
/role-debate security,performance
"关于 JWT 令牌的有效期设置"
# 可用性 vs 安全性的平衡
/role-debate frontend,security
"关于双因素认证的 UX 优化"
# 技术选型的辩论
/role-debate architect,mobile
"关于 React Native vs Flutter 的选择"
# 三方辩论
/role-debate architect,security,performance
"关于微服务化的必要性"
test cases passed, vs 10 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.