Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →waybarrios/paper-summarizer
Agents should invoke this skill for academic or technical papers, arXiv/PubMed/IEEE/ACM links, PDFs, methodology review, limitations, practical implications, or extracting findings for engineering decisions.
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 3 more in the full report
5 fixed12 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
At the end of a technical paper summary on distributed key-value store performance, I want a standard verdict block. What three key evaluation metrics should be highlighted in bold within this verdict section?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The verdict section presents structured ratings for reliability, organizational relevance, and action choice. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Extract actionable insights from academic and technical papers.
# Paper Summary: <Paper Title>
**Authors:** [Author list]
**Published:** [Journal/Conference, Date]
**Link:** [URL]
**Quality:** Peer-reviewed / Preprint / Workshop paper
## TL;DR
[1-2 sentence summary of the key contribution]
## Problem
[What problem does this paper address? Why does it matter?]
## Approach
[Methodology in plain language — what did they do?]
## Key Findings
Anchor each finding to the paper so readers can verify. Use **§** for sections, **Fig.** / **Table** when the evidence is visual or tabular.
1. **[Finding 1]:** [Description with key metrics/numbers] — *Evidence:* §[N] [section name]; [Fig. X / Table Y if applicable]
2. **[Finding 2]:** [Description] — *Evidence:* §[N] …
3. **[Finding 3]:** [Description] — *Evidence:* §[N] …
## Claim–evidence map
| # | Claim (one line) | Where in paper | Type |
|---|------------------|----------------|------|
| 1 | [Claim] | §3.2 Results, Table 2 | Empirical |
| 2 | [Claim] | §1 Introduction | Stated goal |
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.