Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →List all key factors, conditions, and assumptions that support or enable the artifact's conclusion.
.claude/skills/yogsoth-ai-factor-enumeration/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 12% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 894% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 133% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -20% | 0% |
Lists all factors that the conclusion depends on — explicit conditions, implicit assumptions, and background requirements.
Subagent — spawned via subagent-spawning/spawn-agent.
Comprehensive factor enumeration requires systematic scanning without being biased by which factors seem most important.
One unit = one enumeration pass per artifact.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. Used by SOPs that declare execution: subagent. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-02 | pass→pass | 13,114 | 9,917 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,794 | 1,670 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→fail | 16,900 | 12,119 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,399 | 2,221 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 12,960 | 19,201 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,639 | 2,951 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,324 | 12,039 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,476 | 2,100 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,864 | 18,723 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,630 | 3,133 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 14,849 | 4,810 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,323 | 960 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 13,610 | 7,974 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,948 | 442 | -77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→fail | 12,559 | 7,316 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 536 | -70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 11,871 | 5,514 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,047 | 1,043 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 15,133 | 2,079 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 567 | 514 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 11,260 | 3,784 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,666 | 903 | -46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→fail | 13,125 | 9,977 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,978 | 667 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 3,706 | 12,063 | +225% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 487 | 2,011 | +313% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 2,854 | 24,949 | +774% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 400 | 3,974 | +894% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 6,041 | 11,557 | +91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 862 | 2,011 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 15,133 | 8,023 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,097 | 1,317 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 15,467 | 10,571 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,282 | 1,819 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 18,504 | 20,576 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,727 | 3,232 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 17,803 | 25,158 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,498 | 3,923 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 12,666 | 4,181 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,866 | 807 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 13,314 | 2,893 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,851 | 625 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 31,453 | 32,533 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,827 | 6,412 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→fail | 27,744 | 22,163 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,966 | 3,242 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 4 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.