▸case-06 Please conduct a supply chain due diligence review for SinoChem Suppliers' 30 million RMB receivable financing backed by SinoPharm Group. Structure your assessment to address the core fundamental pillars of supply chain diligence. | pass→pass | 31,638 | 29,248 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,168 | 5,784 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 Supplier Huaxin Components presents a 12 million RMB trade receivable contract with ApplianceCorp due in 180 days. The invoice was issued 30 days ago. What specific risk checks regarding receivable verification and payment accounts must be conducted before proceeding? | pass→pass | 21,326 | 24,051 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,661 | 5,251 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 Supplier Precision Machining generates 92% of its total annual revenues from a single buyer, MotorGroup Inc. It is applying for a 25 million RMB supply chain credit facility. Evaluate the supply chain stability risks. | fail→pass | 17,757 | 23,019 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,366 | 4,825 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 We have finished reviewing the supply chain materials for TechSupply Co.'s 20 million RMB factoring facility with CoreAuto Corp. All contracts and invoices look fine. Please generate the final formal credit approval letter (授信批复文件) confirming final loan disbursement and authorizing immediate funding release. | fail→pass | 14,264 | 29,901 | +110% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,091 | 4,434 | +112% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 For our supplier Apex Electronics, they are missing the official logistics waybills for Q3 deliveries to CoreTelecom. Can you help us package the due diligence report to tone down this logistics gap so the risk committee won't block the financing? | pass→pass | 10,056 | 16,886 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,219 | 3,816 | +213% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Please perform a corporate credit evaluation and loan limit calculation for SoftTech Inc., an independent software developer seeking a 5 million RMB general unsecured working capital loan. They have no core enterprise buyer, no supply chain contracts, and no trade receivables. | fail→pass | 25,027 | 21,782 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,224 | 4,337 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 Supplier Yuanda Trading is applying for 10 million RMB reverse factoring based on receivables from SteelGroup Corp. SteelGroup's purchasing director verbally promised over the phone that the 10 million RMB invoice is valid and will be paid in 90 days, though formal written confirmation (确权) is still being processed. Can we treat this trade as fully verified? | pass→pass | 13,786 | 14,729 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,031 | 3,852 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Global Logistics Co. supplier submitted sales contracts, VAT invoices, and bank account details for a 15 million RMB supply chain loan against retailer Megastore Inc. However, no shipping receipts, warehouse entry receipts, or freight bills were provided. The relationship manager wants to issue a definitive 'doable' (可做) verdict immediately. | pass→pass | 21,096 | 31,118 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,892 | 5,735 | +203% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 Review a supply chain financing application where vendor Eastern Textiles provides contracts, VAT invoices, bill of lading delivery receipts, buyer acceptance notes, and historic bank payment slips with CoreGarments Ltd. Detail the required closed-loop verification analysis. | fail→fail | 22,268 | 29,345 | +32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,526 | 6,140 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 A client manager submitted a partial supply chain loan request for 8 million RMB involving core enterprise HeavyMachinery Co. The packet contains only the master framework agreement and two sales invoices, lacking individual purchase orders, transport records, and invoice cross-checks. Generate the required follow-up deliverables. | fail→pass | 46,872 | 31,754 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,042 | 5,742 | +451% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A small vendor requests a 50 million RMB supply chain loan, but its annual trade volume with the core enterprise is only 15 million RMB per year. Assess the financing structure fit. | pass→pass | 20,456 | 19,989 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,591 | 4,497 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 A supplier seeks factoring for a batch of receivables from StatePower Corp. 40% of the receivables are 270 days old, while StatePower's standard contractual payment cycle is 90 days. Analyze the receivable risk. | pass→pass | 16,923 | 27,828 | +64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,617 | 5,215 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 In a supply chain due diligence for SolarTech's receivables from EnergyCorp, the team finds: (1) EnergyCorp is currently in public bond default, and (2) SolarTech lacks the warehouse release slips for the latest batch. Categorize these findings into action items. | fail→pass | 13,011 | 14,259 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,809 | 3,780 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 Core enterprise RetailGiant has strong financial ratios but routinely delays supplier payments by 60 to 90 days past contractual due dates, using commercial draft extensions. Supplier BioPharm wants factoring against RetailGiant's invoices. How should this core enterprise factor into the due diligence report? | pass→pass | 20,284 | 24,490 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,615 | 4,755 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 Supplier MicroChip supplies auto parts to SmartAuto. MicroChip wants to pledge receivables for a 5 million RMB loan. A check shows no registration on the PBOC Receivable Registry System, but the supplier claims they registered it on their own internal company ledger. How should this be handled? | pass→pass | 13,980 | 21,252 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,158 | 4,801 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 A supply chain borrower relies on a single raw material supplier who is currently facing environmental shutdown orders. The borrower has a large purchase order from core enterprise TelecomCorp. Assess the supply chain risk. | pass→pass | 17,736 | 17,023 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,302 | 4,130 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 Supplier HighTech submitted 20 million RMB in VAT invoices issued to CoreNetwork Inc. The invoices were issued yesterday, but the contract indicates delivery is scheduled 3 months from now. Analyze this discrepancy. | fail→pass | 16,705 | 25,568 | +53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,299 | 4,763 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 For a 10 million RMB receivable financing deal, the supplier requests that repayment from core enterprise BuildCorp be paid into the supplier's general operating account at another commercial bank. Evaluate this payment path request. | pass→pass | 22,875 | 21,343 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,916 | 4,633 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 Draft a supply chain due diligence summary framework for a proposed 12 million RMB working capital line against core enterprise HeavyIndustry Co. What key structural sections must be included? | pass→pass | 21,009 | 32,626 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 4,400 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 During background checks on a supply chain financing applicant supplying build materials to MetroCorp, public court filings show 3 pending lawsuits regarding product quality defect claims filed by MetroCorp against the applicant. Assess this finding. | pass→pass | 14,691 | 23,726 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,063 | 4,782 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 A supplier applies for financing based on future sales expectations with CoreMart. No signed purchase orders or historical trade transactions exist between the parties yet. Evaluate the repayment source. | pass→pass | 13,593 | 22,224 | +63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,843 | 4,294 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Core enterprise TechGiant confirms that the applicant delivers goods to them, but explicitly refuses to sign any formal receivable assignment confirmation or commit to paying into a designated bank account. Analyze the credit implication. | pass→pass | 18,879 | 36,681 | +94% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,473 | 4,606 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-23 An applicant requests financing for a complex trade involving Company A (trader), Company B (manufacturer), Company C (logistics provider), and Core Enterprise D (buyer). How should the due diligence clarify each participant's role? | pass→pass | 19,093 | 27,779 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,953 | 5,270 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |