Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Interpret the three core financial statements (income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement) to assess business health and performance. Use this skill when the user needs to read financial statements, understand profitability vs cash flow, evaluate a company's financial position, or prepare for investor/board meetings — even if they say 'explain these financials', 'are we making money', 'read this annual report', or 'what do these numbers mean'.
.claude/skills/asgard-ai-platform-data-financial-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -47% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -35% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -34% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 11% | 0% |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 51% | 0% |
IRON LAW: Read All Three Statements Together
A company can be profitable (Income Statement) but cash-poor (Cash Flow Statement).
A company can have high assets (Balance Sheet) funded entirely by debt.
Reading one statement alone gives an incomplete — and potentially misleading — picture.
ALWAYS read all three and check for consistency.Income Statement (損益表) — Did we make money THIS PERIOD?
Balance Sheet (資產負債表) — What do we own and owe RIGHT NOW?
Cash Flow Statement (現金流量表) — Where did cash come from and go?
| Red Flag | What It Means | |----------|-------------| | Revenue growing but operating cash flow declining | Possible revenue recognition issues, rising receivables | | Net income positive but free cash flow negative | Earnings driven by accruals, not cash; heavy capex | | Assets growing faster than revenue | Inefficient asset utilization | | Debt growing faster than equity | Increasing leverage risk | | Inventory growing faster than revenue | Possible obsolescence, demand slowdown |
markdown# Financial Statement Analysis: {Company} — {Period} ## Income Statement Highlights | Metric | Current | Prior Year | Change | |--------|---------|-----------|--------| | Revenue | ${X} | ${X} | {%} | | Gross Margin | {%} | {%} | {±pp} | | Operating Margin | {%} | {%} | {±pp} | | Net Income | ${X} | ${X} | {%} | ## Balance Sheet Highlights | Metric | Current | Prior Year | |--------|---------|-----------| | Total Assets | ${X} | ${X} | | Total Debt | ${X} | ${X} | | D/E Ratio | {X} | {X} | | Current Ratio | {X} | {X} | ## Cash Flow Highlights | Category | Amount | |----------|--------| | Operating CF | ${X} | | Investing CF | ${X} | | Financing CF | ${X} | | Free Cash Flow | ${X} | ## Red Flags - {any detected} ## Overall Assessment {Financial health verdict with key rationale}
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | 19,021 | 32,858 | +73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,360 | 6,339 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 36,800 | 24,084 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 7,823 | 4,168 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 37,156 | 27,488 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,287 | 5,417 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 47,780 | 22,068 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,299 | 5,493 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 7,566 | 15,647 | +107% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,454 | 3,437 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 33,652 | 23,409 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,314 | 6,090 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,485 | 11,457 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,733 | 3,031 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 9,930 | 10,511 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,867 | 2,514 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 12,208 | 7,118 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,626 | 2,229 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,329 | 10,354 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,647 | 2,558 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,726 | 13,044 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,216 | 3,005 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 9,020 | 7,709 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,452 | 2,113 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 7,682 | 10,626 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,165 | 2,520 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 19,887 | 16,093 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,346 | 3,647 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 15,925 | 16,912 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,340 | 3,324 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 13,215 | 11,494 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,093 | 2,639 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 8,900 | 9,314 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,501 | 2,265 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,399 | 8,962 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,527 | 2,303 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 4,579 | 4,994 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 821 | 1,835 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 14,208 | 8,922 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,333 | 2,391 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 6,520 | 2,194 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,105 | 1,403 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 11,460 | 9,140 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,653 | 2,494 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 10,059 | 6,277 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,722 | 1,929 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.