Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Statistical methods for calling hits in CRISPR screens. Covers MAGeCK, BAGEL2, drugZ, and custom approaches for identifying essential and resistance genes. Use when identifying significant genes from screen count data after QC passes.
.claude/skills/bio-crispr-screens-hit-calling/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: MAGeCK 0.5+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scipy 1.12+, statsmodels 0.14+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Identify essential genes from my CRISPR screen" → Call significant gene hits from sgRNA count data using statistical methods that account for guide-level variability and multiple testing.
BAGEL.py bf for Bayes factor essentiality scoringdrugZ for fold-change based analysisGoal: Identify essential genes using Bayesian classification against reference gene sets.
Approach: Calculate sgRNA fold changes, compute Bayes Factors using known essential and non-essential gene sets as training data, and assess precision-recall at different thresholds.
bash# BAGEL2 for Bayesian gene essentiality # Uses reference essential/non-essential genes # Calculate fold changes bagel2 fc \ -i counts.txt \ -o foldchange.txt \ -c Control1,Control2 \ -t Treatment1,Treatment2 # Calculate Bayes Factor bagel2 bf \ -i foldchange.txt \ -o bayes_factor.txt \ -e essential_genes.txt \ -n nonessential_genes.txt \ -c 1 # Number of bootstrap iterations # Precision-recall analysis bagel2 pr \ -i bayes_factor.txt \ -o precision_recall.txt \ -e essential_genes.txt \ -n nonessential_genes.txt
bash# DrugZ for drug screens (synergy/resistance) drugz.py \ -i counts.txt \ -o drugz_output.txt \ -c Control1,Control2 \ -x Treatment1,Treatment2 \ --remove-genes Control_genes.txt # Output columns: # Gene, sumZ (combined z-score), normZ, pval_synth (synthetic lethal), pval_supp (suppressor)
Goal: Call screen hits using a z-score approach without external tools.
Approach: RPM-normalize counts, compute per-sgRNA log2 fold changes, aggregate to gene level, derive z-scores from the null distribution, and apply FDR correction.
pythonimport pandas as pd import numpy as np from scipy import stats # Load counts counts = pd.read_csv('counts.txt', sep='\t', index_col=0) genes = counts['Gene'] ctrl_cols = ['Control1', 'Control2'] treat_cols = ['Treatment1', 'Treatment2'] # Normalize (reads per million) def rpm_normalize(df): return df / df.sum() * 1e6 ctrl_rpm = rpm_normalize(counts[ctrl_cols]) treat_rpm = rpm_normalize(counts[treat_cols]) # Log2 fold change per sgRNA lfc = np.log2((treat_rpm.mean(axis=1) + 1) / (ctrl_rpm.mean(axis=1) + 1)) # Aggregate to gene level gene_lfc = pd.DataFrame({'Gene': genes, 'LFC': lfc}).groupby('Gene')['LFC'].agg(['mean', 'std', 'count']) gene_lfc.columns = ['mean_lfc', 'std_lfc', 'n_sgrnas'] # Z-score based on null distribution (non-targeting controls or all genes) null_mean = gene_lfc['mean_lfc'].median() null_std = gene_lfc['mean_lfc'].std() gene_lfc['z_score'] = (gene_lfc['mean_lfc'] - null_mean) / null_std gene_lfc['pvalue'] = 2 * stats.norm.sf(abs(gene_lfc['z_score'])) from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests _, gene_lfc['fdr'], _, _ = multipletests(gene_lfc['pvalue'], method='fdr_bh') # Call hits essential = gene_lfc[(gene_lfc['z_score'] < -2) & (gene_lfc['fdr'] < 0.1)] resistance = gene_lfc[(gene_lfc['z_score'] > 2) & (gene_lfc['fdr'] < 0.1)] print(f'Essential genes: {len(essential)}') print(f'Resistance genes: {len(resistance)}')
Goal: Rank genes by combining evidence across multiple sgRNAs using the RRA algorithm.
Approach: Rank sgRNA-level p-values, compute per-gene RRA scores using beta-distribution modeling of rank uniformity, and select genes with significantly non-uniform guide rankings.
pythonfrom scipy.stats import rankdata, norm import numpy as np def rra_score(ranks, n_total): '''Calculate RRA score for a set of ranks''' k = len(ranks) sorted_ranks = np.sort(ranks) rho = sorted_ranks / n_total # Beta distribution p-values from scipy.stats import beta pvals = [beta.cdf(rho[i], i + 1, k - i) for i in range(k)] # Return minimum p-value (most significant) return min(pvals) # Apply to each gene def calculate_gene_rra(sgrna_pvals, genes, n_total): results = [] for gene in genes.unique(): gene_pvals = sgrna_pvals[genes == gene] gene_ranks = rankdata(gene_pvals) rra = rra_score(gene_ranks, len(gene_pvals)) results.append({'gene': gene, 'rra_score': rra, 'n_sgrnas': len(gene_pvals)}) return pd.DataFrame(results)
python# Conservative approach: use second-best sgRNA per gene # Reduces false positives from single outlier sgRNAs def second_best_lfc(lfc_series, genes): '''Return second-most extreme LFC per gene''' results = [] for gene in genes.unique(): gene_lfc = lfc_series[genes == gene].sort_values() if len(gene_lfc) >= 2: # For dropout, use second smallest (second most negative) results.append({'gene': gene, 'second_best_lfc': gene_lfc.iloc[1]}) else: results.append({'gene': gene, 'second_best_lfc': gene_lfc.iloc[0]}) return pd.DataFrame(results) second_best = second_best_lfc(lfc, genes)
Goal: Identify high-confidence hits by requiring agreement across multiple analysis methods.
Approach: Load gene-level results from MAGeCK, BAGEL2, and DrugZ, merge on gene name, and flag consensus hits called by two or more methods.
python# Load results from different methods mageck = pd.read_csv('mageck.gene_summary.txt', sep='\t') bagel = pd.read_csv('bagel_bf.txt', sep='\t') drugz = pd.read_csv('drugz_output.txt', sep='\t') # Merge on gene merged = mageck[['id', 'neg|fdr']].rename(columns={'id': 'gene', 'neg|fdr': 'mageck_fdr'}) merged = merged.merge(bagel[['Gene', 'BF']].rename(columns={'Gene': 'gene', 'BF': 'bagel_bf'}), on='gene') merged = merged.merge(drugz[['GENE', 'fdr_synth']].rename(columns={'GENE': 'gene', 'fdr_synth': 'drugz_fdr'}), on='gene') # Consensus hits merged['mageck_hit'] = merged['mageck_fdr'] < 0.1 merged['bagel_hit'] = merged['bagel_bf'] > 5 # BF > 5 suggests essential merged['drugz_hit'] = merged['drugz_fdr'] < 0.1 merged['consensus'] = merged['mageck_hit'].astype(int) + merged['bagel_hit'].astype(int) + merged['drugz_hit'].astype(int) # High confidence hits called by 2+ methods high_conf = merged[merged['consensus'] >= 2] print(f'High confidence hits (2+ methods): {len(high_conf)}')
python# For screens with multiple timepoints def time_course_hits(counts, timepoints, genes): '''Identify genes with consistent depletion over time''' lfc_by_time = {} for t in timepoints: t0_cols = [c for c in counts.columns if 'T0' in c] t_cols = [c for c in counts.columns if f'T{t}' in c] t0_mean = counts[t0_cols].mean(axis=1) t_mean = counts[t_cols].mean(axis=1) lfc_by_time[t] = np.log2((t_mean + 1) / (t0_mean + 1)) # Aggregate and check for consistent direction lfc_df = pd.DataFrame(lfc_by_time) lfc_df['Gene'] = genes gene_summary = lfc_df.groupby('Gene').mean() gene_summary['all_negative'] = (gene_summary < 0).all(axis=1) gene_summary['trend'] = gene_summary.apply(lambda x: np.polyfit(range(len(timepoints)), x[:-1], 1)[0], axis=1) return gene_summary[gene_summary['all_negative']].sort_values('trend')
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Rank plot fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6)) results = pd.read_csv('mageck.gene_summary.txt', sep='\t') results = results.sort_values('neg|score') results['rank'] = range(1, len(results) + 1) ax.scatter(results['rank'], -np.log10(results['neg|fdr']), c=['red' if fdr < 0.05 else 'gray' for fdr in results['neg|fdr']], alpha=0.5, s=10) # Label top hits top = results[results['neg|fdr'] < 0.01].head(10) for _, row in top.iterrows(): ax.annotate(row['id'], (row['rank'], -np.log10(row['neg|fdr']))) ax.axhline(-np.log10(0.05), linestyle='--', color='black') ax.set_xlabel('Gene Rank') ax.set_ylabel('-log10(FDR)') ax.set_title('CRISPR Screen Hits') plt.savefig('hit_ranking.png', dpi=150)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.